• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mushroom killer arrested

How will the defense explain how she did not ingest the poison herself?

When you go to a friends place for a meal you should always insist that the host eat first. This will be evidence that the meal you are eating is not poisonous. This is a case where they failed to do this and paid the price.
 
irreconcilable differences?

At the Perez Hilton (yes, I know) website, it was stated, "But why invite her in-laws over in the first place? Why poison them? She reportedly asked to come over to win back her ex-husband Simon Patterson. Meanwhile, the family members accepted the invite since they wanted to hold an “intervention” for her and stop the former couple from reconciling!" I have now read two reports that she threw away a food dehydrator. How accurate Hilton's reporting is anyone's guess.
 
Last edited:
At the Perez Hilton (yes, I know) website, it was stated, "But why invite her in-laws over in the first place? Why poison them? She reportedly asked to come over to win back her ex-husband Simon Patterson. Meanwhile, the family members accepted the invite since they wanted to hold an “intervention” for her and stop the former couple from reconciling!" I have now read two reports that she threw away a food dehydrator. How accurate Hilton's reporting is anyone's guess.

The police have confirmed that she threw away the dehydrator. In fact she admitted it.
 
the drying process

I did a quick search. Drying poisonous mushrooms will not make them less toxic, but I found nothing to suggest that they would become more toxic, either. The mass of the poison is constant before versus after the drying process. She may well be guilty, but she also might not be the first innocent person to do something incriminating. The Larry Swearingen case in Texas, about which there is a short thread in this sub-forum, probably falls into that category.
EDT
Here is a link to a story from SkyNews on the case.
 
Last edited:
I did a quick search. Drying poisonous mushrooms will not make them less toxic, but I found nothing to suggest that they would become more toxic, either. The mass of the poison is constant before versus after the drying process. She may well be guilty, but she also might not be the first innocent person to do something incriminating. The Larry Swearingen case in Texas, about which there is a short thread in this sub-forum, probably falls into that category.
EDT
Here is a link to a story from SkyNews on the case.
The Larry Swearingen case was satisfactorily resolved by executing an innocent man. We can all move right along.
There are fascinating conundrums in the current case, around motive means and opportunity.
With the surprise absence of the husband, would she not delay the executions until they were all corralled. Did she immunize herself by low doses prior and so on.
 
The Larry Swearingen case was satisfactorily resolved by executing an innocent man. We can all move right along.
There are fascinating conundrums in the current case, around motive means and opportunity.
With the surprise absence of the husband, would she not delay the executions until they were all corralled. Did she immunize herself by low doses prior and so on.


It's not a virus, it's a highly toxic poison. Planning to murder five people would make you a bit wacky in the first place. Logic is not her strong point.
 
It's not a virus, it's a highly toxic poison. Planning to murder five people would make you a bit wacky in the first place. Logic is not her strong point.
As Chris says, she may well be guilty.
If so it was a strategy for the perfect crime, certain to fail, and it did.
But imagine if she always foraged for the same mushrooms never connected the husband sickness, and kept on with the delicacy. She is obviously a serial killer, but...
 
I did a quick search. Drying poisonous mushrooms will not make them less toxic, but I found nothing to suggest that they would become more toxic, either. The mass of the poison is constant before versus after the drying process. She may well be guilty, but she also might not be the first innocent person to do something incriminating. The Larry Swearingen case in Texas, about which there is a short thread in this sub-forum, probably falls into that category.
EDT
Here is a link to a story from SkyNews on the case.
However the ratio of toxin to mass would increase.
 
knowledge and opportunity

However the ratio of toxin to mass would increase.
Here is my thought experiment: Dry one toxic mushroom and do not dry another identical one. If one consumes the first or the second, the mass of toxin consumed is the same in either situation. Another issue is how much toxin leeches from the mushroom into the rest of the dish. The drying process might conceivably change the percentage that leaves the mushroom and enters the sauce. I was not able to find any information relating to this question.

I lean slightly toward her being guilty, although I am far from certain. For example, a neighbor saying that she used to forage (and saying so after the fact of the crime) is not strong evidence that she had enough knowledge and opportunity to find poisonous mushrooms. Have poisonous mushrooms been found in that area? I do not recall seeing this question addressed.
EDT
WebMD: "Death cap mushrooms are poisonous regardless of how they’re prepared. The amatoxins in death caps are very stable and are not affected by heat or acids. Cooking, drying, or freezing these mushrooms has no effect on how poisonous they are."
 
Last edited:
Here is my thought experiment: Dry one toxic mushroom and do not dry another identical one. If one consumes the first or the second, the mass of toxin consumed is the same in either situation. Another issue is how much toxin leeches from the mushroom into the rest of the dish. The drying process might conceivably change the percentage that leaves the mushroom and enters the sauce. I was not able to find any information relating to this question.

I lean slightly toward her being guilty, although I am far from certain. For example, a neighbor saying that she used to forage (and saying so after the fact of the crime) is not strong evidence that she had enough knowledge and opportunity to find poisonous mushrooms. Have poisonous mushrooms been found in that area? I do not recall seeing this question addressed.
EDT
WebMD: "Death cap mushrooms are poisonous regardless of how they’re prepared. The amatoxins in death caps are very stable and are not affected by heat or acids. Cooking, drying, or freezing these mushrooms has no effect on how poisonous they are."
I get it. But less total mass makes it easier to eat more of them.
 
As Chris says, she may well be guilty.
If so it was a strategy for the perfect crime, certain to fail, and it did.
But imagine if she always foraged for the same mushrooms never connected the husband sickness, and kept on with the delicacy. She is obviously a serial killer, but...

No buts about it. She is an idiot who took some time to perfect her craft (did you miss the attempted murder charges?). Her attempts to explain the "accident" were laughable. Neither she nor her children got sick. She incriminated herself with the easily disproved story of getting dry mushrooms in a specific suburb far away.

And why the dehydrator and its disposal? I have never seen that used in any Beef Wellington recipe I've seen.

Finally, Victoria Police, while far from perfect, is nevertheless extremely careful in charging people with murder. There will be a committal hearing first, where I suspect her defence will use all the paltry evidence they have. Then trial by jury, guilty and life imprisonment.
 
He defence may be weak, but can the prosecution prove beyond reasonable doubt her guilt? A good jury would want to hear one person say they have first-hand evidence of her guilt. I cannot see that witness coming forward. The evidence is all circumstantial.
 
He defence may be weak, but can the prosecution prove beyond reasonable doubt her guilt? A good jury would want to hear one person say they have first-hand evidence of her guilt. I cannot see that witness coming forward. The evidence is all circumstantial.

I think you misunderstand how criminal trials work. Beyond reasonable doubt does not require witnesses of the crime. Otherwise very few prosecutions would get up.

Circumstantial evidences is very powerful. Look at the Dawson conviction to see it at work.
 
2014 poisoning in Canberra

"In 2014, Woolworths was accused of selling the mushrooms accidentally at a Canberra store after a woman fell ill. She had to have a liver transplant and was in a coma for a week after ingesting the death caps. The woman was insistent the mushrooms could only have been purchased from the supermarket chain. It was a claim vociferously denied by Woolworths. Health officials in the ACT cleared Woolworths after an investigation and said it was more likely the death caps had been picked from the ground after heavy rain in Canberra.* They can be found wild across many parts of Australia." link
*See this link among others. Some background information on the present case here.
 
"In 2014, Woolworths was accused of selling the mushrooms accidentally at a Canberra store after a woman fell ill. She had to have a liver transplant and was in a coma for a week after ingesting the death caps. The woman was insistent the mushrooms could only have been purchased from the supermarket chain. It was a claim vociferously denied by Woolworths. Health officials in the ACT cleared Woolworths after an investigation and said it was more likely the death caps had been picked from the ground after heavy rain in Canberra.* They can be found wild across many parts of Australia." link
*See this link among others. Some background information on the present case here.

It's a particular risk in Canberra because of the Oak trees.

(Canberra has two "cork oak" forests.)
 
I had a flash of inspiration, she wanted people to suffer but not be dead.
Her prior form on husband says as much.
 

Back
Top Bottom