• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Multiculturalism rocks!

No.
britian probably is not in Europe.
I cant find it on a map of Europe anyway.
 
lionking said:
Did you read the MPA report? It is clearly talking about a sample, and the results look disturbing. If it's untrue, it would be great if it were refuted. Is there any evidence that the report is faulty, or must it be incorrect if it is used BMP for political purposes?
Click to expand...

The original report? No I couldn't find it. Got a link?

But do the sums Lionking......
 
If the report revealed whites did the majority of raping, would you fight to throw Europeans out of Europe?
 
Soapy Sam said:
No.
britian probably is not in Europe.
I cant find it on a map of Europe anyway.
Click to expand...
I think you will find that the convention used in assessing geopolitical areas of the world, Britain is in Europe in the same way that Japan is in Asia, albeit the both of them are largish island nations just off the mainland.

That the Brits like to sneer at the Continentals goes without saying. It's all good.
You might also find it of interest that the British government was a member of the WEU, and provided armed forces for WEU Operations. (Included in that was a blockade/Embargo various Former Yugoslav parties).

DR
 
Last edited:
Wait... what has gang-rape got to do with "multiculturalism"?
 
volatile said:
Wait... what has gang-rape got to do with "multiculturalism"?
Click to expand...
Arcade seems to present us with the idea that multi culturalism is a disproportionate risk for whites who don't want to be raped, based on his numbers cited, who the perps were, and who the victims were. (Unsure of the cred of the numbers). He thus, as I understand his OP, is advocating against multi culturalism and "racial mixing" thanks to these rape stats.

Had the stats shown that the rapists tended to rape within their own racial/ethinc group, I doubt Arcade would have seen fit to comment, but that's a guess.

DR
 
Darth Rotor said:
Arcade seems to present us with the idea that multi culturalism is a disproportionate risk for whites who don't want to be raped, based on his numbers cited, who the perps were, and who the victims were.
Click to expand...

The point is - even if it is true that the perps of gang rape are predominantly non-white, it does not follow that it is necessarily true that the perps are predominantly non-British (culturally).

What do these stats, even if credible as reported by the BNP, have to do with multiculturalism? Arcade hasn't told us.

Racists are stoopid.
 
lionking said:
Does it not show a disproportionate percentage of blacks are involved in rape? I just want a bit of honesty in the debate, not an exercise in PC.
Click to expand...

I don't think we have the information necessary to judge if the percentage is disproportionate. (ETA2: Prima facie, though, it does seem high.)

However, the figures clearly do not say that 92% of the rapists taking part in gang-rape are non-white.

8% of the gangs were all white
24% of the gangs were of mixed ethnicity. Some of those rapists may have been white.
32% of the gangs were all-black
36% of the gangs had no specified ethnicity. Some of those rapists may have been white.

We can say that between 8 and 68% of the gang-rapes involved white rapists.

I don't think we have enough data to begin to guess at the proportion of white or non-white rapist taking part in gang rapes. Well, we can probably set some limits, but they're going to be wide.

ETA: (Pressed "Submit" too soon.)

We don't have the breakdown on numbers involved in each gang-rape by ethnicity (it could be that rapes involving white men had 6 participants). It's not clear to me if they're counting anything apart from white and black (from the victim breakdown, though, I think they may be). We also don't know if each of the 93 incidents were perpetrated by different gangs; if all the white-only rapes were by the same gang, but the black-only ones were by different gangs (or vice-versa), that would skew the percentage of rapists who were white.

All that said, it may well be that there is a greater propensity for black men to take part in gang rapes than other ethnic groups. If so, the reasons need to be understood, and something needs to be done about it (though that applies to the problem in general).

All of which is to say that there is nothing in the figures to support the headline "92 percent of all gang rapists in London are non-white". It could be true; the figure could even be higher; you simply, unless I've missed something (and I admit i have only skimmed the data), cannot tell.
 
Last edited:
I think the solution is for the whites to step up and do their fair share of the gang raping, to get the numbers more in line.

Come on, white brits, get off your bums and get to work.
 
Region Rat said:
I think the solution is for the whites to step up and do their fair share of the gang raping, to get the numbers more in line.

Come on, white brits, get off your bums and get to work.
Click to expand...

Well, that's another issue; we don't know the nationality, as opposed to apparent ethnicity, of any of the rapists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom