acbytesla
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2012
- Messages
- 39,534
I'd settle for him getting out after 6 years, penniless.
Force him to live the rest of his life in a cardboard box in an alley in Chicago. That'll work.
I'd settle for him getting out after 6 years, penniless.
I'll settle for life in the skeeviest Motel 6 in the country, sans housekeeping services. After he's released from the NY state prison system that is.Force him to live the rest of his life in a cardboard box in an alley in Chicago. That'll work.
As it's a thread about trump I think it's important that we get Trump's own words.
That doesn't count the sentence he's going to get from the new state charges.
If convicted, of course.
In our desire for retribution, we should not abandon core principles.
True, innocent until proven guilty and all that.If convicted, of course.That doesn't count the sentence he's going to get from the new state charges.
In our desire for retribution, we should not abandon core principles.
From the “It couldn’t happen to a nicer guy” files:
CNN - Prosecutors with the Manhattan district attorney's office announced state fraud charges Wednesday against Paul Manafort.
The announcement adds to the legal trouble for Donald Trump's former campaign chairman, who is already facing years in prison on federal charges.
I'll settle for life in the skeeviest Motel 6 in the country, sans housekeeping services. After he's released from the NY state prison system that is.
True, innocent until proven guilty and all that.
I guess its easy when you're dealing with someone who's already been found guilty to assume the worst of them.
By the way, is anyone familiar enough with the new charges to know if they are impacted by New York's double jeopardy laws? There does seem to be some overlap between the charges from his first trial and the new state charges? There does seem to be some overlap between them.
Manafort really could end up dying in prison, made all the more likely if he is as sick as he claims to be. If so, then good job - I have no sympathy for him. He is a lying, cheating piece of filth whose greed has almost certainly led to the deaths of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of people.
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/03/paul-manafort-beneficiary-of-americas-sentencing-gap.html
Yes, but at least some of the charges Manafort faced in the first trial involved bank fraud related to real estate. I'm just concerned that some of these new charges might get thrown out because they are related to incidents and charges he's been on trial for federally.Residential mortgage fraud - 3 countsBy the way, is anyone familiar enough with the new charges to know if they are impacted by New York's double jeopardy laws? There does seem to be some overlap between the charges from his first trial and the new state charges? There does seem to be some overlap between them.
Attempting to commit residential mortgage fraud - 1 count
Conspiracy - 3 counts
Falsifying business records - 8 counts
Running a scheme to defraud - 1 count
Total 16 indictments.
Don't you mean "only one who doesn't buy his wheelchair act"?Am I the only one who buys this wheelchair act? Only a year ago, I watched him almost run up the courthouse steps in a five thousand dollar suit.
Don't you mean "only one who doesn't buy his wheelchair act"?
It certainly does look like he's trying to evoke some false sympathy.
Indeed. I appreciate your efforts, thanks.As it's a thread about trump I think it's important that we get Trump's own words.
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the mechanics of this.
Yes, but at least some of the charges Manafort faced in the first trial involved bank fraud related to real estate. I'm just concerned that some of these new charges might get thrown out because they are related to incidents and charges he's been on trial for federally.
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the mechanics of this. CS reposts Trump's twitter feed so that people will see it. He has to repost, because people aren't looking at the twitter feed itself. People aren't looking at the feed because they find it unpleasant to look at. People are grateful to CS for showing it to them anyway.
Yes, I get all that.Well here is my understanding of why these might not be "double jeopardy".Yes, but at least some of the charges Manafort faced in the first trial involved bank fraud related to real estate. I'm just concerned that some of these new charges might get thrown out because they are related to incidents and charges he's been on trial for federally.
The defendant Commits three Crimes - crime "A", crime "B" and crime "C"
The defendant is charged with two of those crimes "A" and "B"
The evidence used to convict the defendant includes admissions that he committed crime "C"
Since he has not been charged with crime "C" he can still be charged with it. The only occasions on which he might not be able to be charged with crime "C" are are if his admission to crime "C" came after invoking his 5A rights, and a subsequent a non-prosecution agreement where he has been granted immunity from prosecution for that crime..... by the Feds.
In Manafort's case, one of the crimes he's already been convicted of federally involve taking out a loan on a property that already had mortgage debt, so the list of federal crimes may already include a 'C'.Apply this template to Paul Manafort....
Crime A = Tax evasion
Crime B = Bank fraud
Crime C = Mortgage fraud
An attorney who said he was speaking with President Donald Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani reassured Michael Cohen in an April 2018 email that Cohen could "sleep well tonight" because he had "friends in high places," according to a copy of an email obtained by CNN.
@GloriaBorger
What a grammatical catastrophe that is. I'm honestly not sure what it says.