Mueller Investigation pt5

Status
Not open for further replies.
Childlike Empress said:
Its owner is a rich man not least thanks to the fact that he once was "Putin's cook" (literally - not a code word for what your mind was just searching for), which is the only connection of this whole blown-up nonsense to Putin. He has more than enough playing money to try himself in internet marketing.
Click to expand...

Well, if he's really Putin's cook then why did you put it in quotes as if it's a euphemism for something else?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Because people like Earthborn think it's a euphemisnm for something else and include this into their conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

Oh, so you admit to trolling for a response, huh? That's funny, because I'd always assumed Putin trains his trolls to be less conspicuous.

I guess you really do learn something new everyday.
 
Cabbage said:
Oh, so you admit to trolling for a response, huh? That's funny, because I'd always assumed Putin trains his trolls to be less conspicuous.

I guess you really do learn something new everyday.
Click to expand...


Rule of so. You are welcome as everybody else to read the article I decided to share with you because I think it is the best, most concise information and good information is what you desperately need.
 
Last edited:
Stacko said:

That's quite a walk back. It's almost like they intended to manipulate the news cycle with the Sunday letter followed by this.
Click to expand...

And conveniently dropped on a Friday, too.

WilliamSeger said:
A little premature, don't you think? I like "Mueller Investigation pt6 - Lowering the Barr."
Click to expand...

Gotta nominate that one!
 
Childlike Empress said:
Rule of so. You are welcome as everybody else to read the article I decided to share with you because I think it is the best, most concise information and good information is what you desperately need.
Click to expand...

No thanks, I have no particular interest in Russian
propaganda. You're welcome to knock yourself out, however.
 
Last edited:
"Although my review is ongoing, I believe that it is in the public interest to describe the report and to summarize the principal conclusions reached by the Special Counsel and the results of his investigation."

Barr is a Trump toady who was appointed by Trump to protect him, and who only got the job because he effectively said he would protect Trump if he got the job

I'm not interested in seeing his description of the report, or his summary. Anything less than the whole report (less redactions for ongoing investigations, and less redactions where information revealed would endanger sources) is unacceptable.

If it looks like a cover-up, sounds like a cover up, feels like a cover-up and smells like a cover-up.... then it IS a cover-up..... and this has all the hallmarks of one.
 
smartcooky said:
"Although my review is ongoing, I believe that it is in the public interest to describe the report and to summarize the principal conclusions reached by the Special Counsel and the results of his investigation."

Barr is a Trump toady who was appointed by Trump to protect him, and who only got the job because he effectively said he would protect Trump if he got the job

I'm not interested in seeing his description of the report, or his summary. Anything less than the whole report (less redactions for ongoing investigations, and less redactions where information revealed would endanger sources) is unacceptable.

If it looks like a cover-up, sounds like a cover up, feels like a cover-up and smells like a cover-up.... then it IS a cover-up..... and this has all the hallmarks of one.
Click to expand...

It neither looks, feels, our sounds like a cover up.
 
Trump Tweets

Robert Mueller was a Hero to the Radical Left Democrats, until he ruled that there was No Collusion with Russia (so ridiculous to even say!). After more than two years since the “insurance policy” statement was made by a dirty cop, I got the answers I wanted, the Truth.....

...The problem is, no matter what the Radical Left Democrats get, no matter what we give them, it will never be enough. Just watch, they will Harass & Complain & Resist (the theme of their movement). So maybe we should just take our victory and say NO, we’ve got a Country to run!

So funny that The New York Times & The Washington Post got a Pulitzer Prize for their coverage (100% NEGATIVE and FAKE!) of Collusion with Russia - And there was No Collusion! So, they were either duped or corrupt? In any event, their prizes should be taken away by the Committee!
 
Last edited:
johnny karate said:
Why of course I'm not defending Trump! I'm just a fair-mined arbiter of the facts.



Anywho... here's some grade-A conspiracy theory Trump propaganda I'm peddling:
Click to expand...


Huh, even lefty organizations like Politifact and CNN are Trump propaganda now? They both had stories about how lawyers on Mueller's team donated the max amount to Hillary's campaign. How far does this conspiracy spread, in your view?

Also, just because they supported Hillary to the max amount allowed by law doesn't mean that they didn't do their jobs. I'm just making the point that it makes the current conspiracy claim that Mueller actually did find evidence of collusion and chose to cover it up very unlikely. After all, if he was behind a cover up for whatever insane reason, why would the Hillary supporters on his staff go along with it?
 
I watched part of the Senator Angus King interview tonight on the PBS program “Firing Line” with Margaret Hoover. He made some interesting points. One of which had to do with Paul Manafort supplying 2016 presidential election polling data with a Russian. What data and why? Manafort shared polling data on the 2016 election with "an elusive consultant named Konstantin Kilimnik who worked for Manafort on election campaigns for pro-Kremlin politicians in eastern Europe." Link to Guardian story Manafort's lawyers conceded in a court filing that Manafort lied when he said he had not shared the data. NBC News Link

The questions Sen. King raised included, what kind of polling data? Manafort served as Trump's campaign chairman. Where did the data come from and what was the data? Was it relatively benign, 'Our guy is going to win!' or 'These are the states where we need some help?' Good questions.

This is from an article in the Washington Post that appeared last January.
Manafort exposed details of the dispute, much of which centers on his relationship with [Konstantin] Kilimnik. The Russian citizen, who began working for Manafort’s consulting firm starting in 2005, has been charged with helping his former boss to obstruct Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference into the 2016 election. He is believed to be in Moscow. The special counsel alleged Manafort “lied about sharing polling data with Mr. Kilimnik related to the 2016 presidential campaign,” according to the unredacted filing. The source of that data, including whether it came from the Trump campaign, is unclear. Link
Click to expand...
 
I predict that after Trump gets re-elected, the Democrat Party will go into a meltdown, and Russiagate will live on as the conspiracy theory du jour. It'll be the equivalent of 9/11 Truth during the Bush administration and Birtherism during the Obama administration.
 
Last edited:
Axiom_Blade said:
I predict that after Trump gets re-elected, the Democrat Party will go into a meltdown, and Russiagate will live on as the conspiracy theory du jour. It'll be the equivalent of 9/11 Truth during the Bush administration and Birtherism during the Obama administration.
Click to expand...

I predict you and some others will continue to believe that despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

First off, are you claiming the Russians didn't interfere with the election?

Are you buying snowflake Trump's POV that Putin didn't influence the election? You know because of his pathologic narcissism Trump can't admit he didn't win without help, right? Just like he's incapable of admitting his inauguration crowd wasn't bigger than Obama's.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
I predict you and some others will continue to believe that despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

First off, are you claiming the Russians didn't interfere with the election?

Are you buying snowflake Trump's POV that Putin didn't influence the election? You know because of his pathologic narcissism Trump can't admit he didn't win without help, right? Just like he's incapable of admitting his inauguration crowd wasn't bigger than Obama's.
Click to expand...

It is pretty amusing listening to these Trump supporters gloating because Trump wasn't indicted which was never really on the table any way. This is the bar for their candidate. Well at least he wasn't indicted.

It's as if they forgot
  • the emails to his son which said that Russia was trying to get Trump elected.
  • how excited Trump's son was about that news.
  • that his son, son in law, campaign and deputy campaign manager met with those Russians.
  • that Trump requested that Russia hack her emails
  • that very day Russia attacked DNC SERVERS
  • and that the head of the Trump campain provided polling data to a Russian agent.
  • that Don Jr, lied about all this.
  • that Jared Kushner lied about this.
  • that Trump Deputy Campaign Manager Rick Gates lied about this
  • that Trump Campaign Manager Paul Manafort lied about this.
  • And President Trump lied about this

And the Democrats are supposed to be guilty for wanting this investigated? Get Serious.

Yea, no collusion. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
acbytesla said:
It is pretty amusing listening to these Trump supporters gloating because Trump wasn't indicted which was never really on the table any way. This is the bar for their candidate. Well at least he wasn't indicted.

It's as if they forgot
  • the emails to his son which said that Russia was trying to get Trump elected.
  • how excited Trump's son was about that news.
  • that his son, son in law, campaign and deputy campaign manager met with those Russians.
  • that Trump requested that Russia hack her emails
  • that very day Russia attacked DNC SERVERS
  • and that the head of the Trump campain provided polling data to a Russian agent.
  • that Don Jr, lied about all this.
  • that Jared Kushner lied about this.
  • that Trump Deputy Campaign Manager Rick Gates lied about this
  • that Trump Campaign Manager Paul Manafort lied about this.
  • And President Trump lied about this

And the Democrats are supposed to be guilty for wanting this investigated? Get Serious.

Yea, no collusion. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Yes, you are still lacking evidence that has this circumstantial evidence point to collusion rather than failed collusion or actors working for mutual benefit independently.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom