Belz...
Fiend God
Could you post the content, for those of us who can't access Twitter during the day?
Just a shoe dropping. When Jr. heard the Russians had stolen Clinton docs, apparently he immediately called one of Trump's best friends (and campaign advisor), Howard Lorber. The chances of this not being a preplanned arrangement to keep Trump in the loop while maintaining plausible deniability are something south of nil.Could you post the content, for those of us who can't access Twitter during the day?![]()
The chances of this not being a preplanned arrangement to keep Trump in the loop while maintaining plausible deniability are something south of nil.
I would like to see and review your calculations to determine the probability.
Please provide evidence that you would like this. Keep in mind that your testimony is not sufficient evidence.
Trump Tweets
Just out: The big deal, very mysterious Don jr telephone calls, after the innocent Trump Tower meeting, that the media & Dems said were made to his father (me), were just conclusively found NOT to be made to me. They were made to friends & business associates of Don.
Please provide evidence that you would like this. Keep in mind that your testimony is not sufficient evidence.
I get the sinking feeling that the Trump Campaign operated very much like the Trump Administration: everyone working very hard to avoid involving Trump in an serious way.
It might very well be the case that a group of Trump advisers worked around Trump for the collusion with Wikileaks and Russia, knowing full well that Trump would only mess things up if he was asked to participate in any way.
But Trump knew that something was up, otherwise he wouldn't try so hard to keep his talks with Putin secret.
She isn't spending enough time on distractions and clickbait stories.
Okay, then.
I think the opposite of this is true, at least for me.
MSNBC's weekday evening news coverage is pretty damned good. If Chris Hays (8pm ET), Rachel Maddow (9 pm), Lawrence O'Donnel (10pm) and Brian Williams (11pm) all did a little bit on everything, all you would get is four versions of a little bit on everything.... That is very unsatisfying for a news hawk like me.
The strength of these four (and what they have got over outfits like Faux News) is that they are not "Sound Bytey". The news strories are analyzed thoroughly, and in depth.... Maddow on Russia, O'Donnell on Congress.
Each of the shows usually does an "anchor" piece; a 20 to 25 minutes of thoroughly researched in depth analysis on some part of the news cycle, and then a few short "supporting" pieces 5 to 10 minutes long to make up the hour.
Maddow, in particular sometimes finds herself dealing in subjects that are outside of her area of expertise; instead of doing a Tucker Carlson or Hannitty, i.e. trying bluff and blather their way though it, she gets people in to help explain aspects of the the laws or proceedings that she does not understand. These are regular contributors to her show...
Barb McQuade (former US Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan).
Chuck Rosenburg (former former acting head of the DEA).
Frank Figliuzzi (former Assistant Director for Counterintelligence at the FBI).
Joyce Vance (former US Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama).
Jill Wine-Banks (one of the prosecutors during the Watergate scandal and former US General Counsel of the Army)
These people bring a wealth of knowledge and experience to any US political discussion. I always come away from watching these shows with a sense of being better informed and having a better understanding of what is currently happening in US politics.
Nope. Everything but the Russia investigation takes second place.
On Wendesday, the big story on most shows was Trump's attacking his Intel advisors, but it just got a couple of brief mentions on Maddow, then it was back to some minor developments in the Russia investigation.
This is meant to be a friendly criticism of Maddown, not an attack.
And yet you call her Mad-down, you sexist!![]()
I can buy the Trump team insulating Trump. I can't buy Trump understanding that he needed to be insulated.
I can buy the Trump team insulating Trump. I can't buy Trump understanding that he needed to be insulated.
I can buy the Trump team insulating Trump. I can't buy Trump understanding that he needed to be insulated.
I read this as “insulted” and it still works. [emoji3]
Why would he need to be insulated? He has a very good brain, after all. He's a very stable genius. He knows more about campaigning than any campaign manager, and he knows more about the law than any lawyer. He knows more about Russia than our intelligence services.
You forgot, and there was no collusion.![]()