Mueller Investigation pt4

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Big Dog said:
Curious how a claim, for example, that seth was quoting w's words becomes the other sides claim
Click to expand...

Hey, pay attention. I'm not saying that this is your claim. I'm refering to your other claim that this makes it a lie and that it debunks Abramson's argument. Again, pay attention, and answer the questions.

It's becoming more and more obvious that you misspoke and aren't willing to admit to an error. Again.
 
The Big Dog said:
How does Abramson lying that Whittaker called the investigation legitimate make Seth a liar?

Tis yet another mystery
Click to expand...

You've had this explained to you several times, and you still don't get it. Even a puppy learns after the third time. Maybe its true what they say about old dogs.... you can't teach them new tricks!
 
smartcooky said:
You've had this explained to you several times, and you still don't get it. Even a puppy learns after the third time. Maybe its true what they say about old dogs.... you can't teach them new tricks!
Click to expand...

You've tried explaining this to him several times, and you still don't get it.
 
Delphic Oracle said:
You've tried explaining this to him several times, and you still don't get it.
Click to expand...


No, I personally haven't tried explaining it to him.... there is no point, its a waste of time. I know I'll just get get one of TDB's standard content-free responses when he has no answer to what you post...

Oy Vey
Fantastic
Adorable
Cool
Hooboy
'K
 
The Big Dog said:
cool story

by the way?

prevaricator: is a noun that means a person who speaks falsely; liar.

a/k/a Seth Abramson
Click to expand...
To the extent I'm aware -- a limited extent admittedly, based on threads here in Politics -- you and Seth share something in common that is impressive. You both have a perfect record ... for certain definitions of the word.
 
Checks in. Hey look at those posts telling me that they already corrected me.

Golly!

Yet Seth Abramson remains utterly totally full of **** when he claimed Whittaker said the Mueller investigation was legitimate.

But all those fellas already told me.
 
The Big Dog said:
Checks in. Hey look at those posts telling me that they already corrected me.

Golly!

Yet Seth Abramson remains utterly totally full of **** when he claimed Whittaker said the Mueller investigation was legitimate.

But all those fellas already told me.
Click to expand...

There are 20 indications in Abramson's tweets that Mueller has months of work left to do. The ONE AND ONLY thing you have been able to find a flaw in, is one word, which is far more likely to be a simple typo than a lie. After all,, if your Dear Leader can manage to confuse "would", and wouldn't" then why could Abramson not simply have typed "legitimate" when he really meant "illegitimate" or "not-legitimate". In any case, that one wrong word or phrase has ZERO impact on the overall thrust of what Abramson is saying.

Anyway, you cling to that lifebelt for dear life TBD... its the only thing you have left that prevents you from sinking!
 
Last edited:
smartcooky said:
There are 20 indications in Abramson's tweets that Mueller has months of work left to do. The ONE AND ONLY thing you have been able to find a flaw in, is one word, which is far more likely to be a simple typo than a lie. After all,, if your Dear Leader can manage to confuse "would", and wouldn't" then why could Abramson not simply have typed "legitimate" when he really meant "illegitimate" or "not-legitimate". In any case, that one wrong word or phrase has ZERO impact on the overall thrust of what Abramson is saying.

Anyway, you cling to that lifebelt for dear life TBD... its the only thing you have left that prevents you from sinking!
Click to expand...

Nah bruh, that was the first thing I chose to focus on in response to the nonsense claims that he was thorough thorough even more thorough than Maddox (which hilarious)

It took 24 hours for someone to figure out, gee, tbd is correct.

Now we have a new claim! It was merely a mistake! Golly, did our thorough hero acknowledge and correct that “mistake “ yet?
 
The Big Dog said:
Nah bruh, that was the first thing I chose to focus on in response to the nonsense claims that he was thorough thorough even more thorough than Maddox (which hilarious)

It took 24 hours for someone to figure out, gee, tbd is correct.

Now we have a new claim! It was merely a mistake!
Click to expand...

You really do have trouble with English comprehension don't you?

I said it was "...far more likely to be a simple typo than a lie".

That is a hypothesis, not a claim. Learn to tell the difference

Also, you might want to learn what a "lie" is, and state your evidence that Abramson actually lied (remember to find out what a lie actually is first)


The Big Dog said:
Golly, did our thorough hero acknowledge and correct that “mistake “ yet?
Click to expand...

If it was a mistake. He hasn't actually said it whther it was or was not. In any case, is it really material to what he is arguing?

IMO, you are using your fake concern to dodge addressing what he has actually said. Of course, I am being generous by assuming that you actually understand what he has said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom