Status
Not open for further replies.
Mueller ain’t a judge.

Bizarre that one of the people who lied us into Iraq gets so must have support from the leftists.
 
Mueller ain’t a judge.

Bizarre that one of the people who lied us into Iraq gets so must have support from the leftists.
It’s because what he is doing - generally, in his investigation - now is lawful and appropriate and necessary. Whether he lied or not in the past has nothing to do with whether his current actions are appropriate.

Support is not necessarily either/or, black and white. You can support someone for what they do appropriately and not support them for what they do inappropriately.
 
I still don't hear many Republican leaders trying to discredit Mueller although they do try and discredit the investigation.
Given the 100-0 vote of confidence in Mueller as recently as 2011, a good few still-seated Republican senators would have questions to answer if they did. A lot more Republicans responded very favourably to Mueller's appointment, what with him being a lifelong registered Republican of proven ability and integrity. His enquiry would be efficient and its conclusions unassailable from either side, putting the damn' thing to rest, because, after all, there can't be anything in it.

Even Trumpists were positive then, but they didn't see beyond "lifelong Republican" and assumed a partisan whitewash would shortly follow.
 
Mueller ain’t a judge.

Bizarre that one of the people who lied us into Iraq gets so must have support from the leftists.

No, that is perfectly explicable given his role in investigating the amoral buffoon you have in power. What is bizarre is support for him.
 
Last edited:
It’s because what he is doing - generally, in his investigation - now is lawful and appropriate and necessary. Whether he lied or not in the past has nothing to do with whether his current actions are appropriate.

Support is not necessarily either/or, black and white. You can support someone for what they do appropriately and not support them for what they do inappropriately.

It doesn’t matter how many times this kind of thing is explained to the cultists it never gets through. They will continue to project their pig headed devotions and partisan perspectives.
 
Mueller ain’t a judge.

Bizarre that one of the people who lied us into Iraq gets so must have support from the leftists.

Lied means he knew what was saying waa a falsehood. You HAVE ZERO...ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE that says he new differently.

And who the **** is a leftist? Mueller had 100 percent support to become head of the FBI TWICE! Appointed first by a Republican President and approved by every Republican and Democratic Senator. Then he was appointed by a Democratic President and confirmed again a second time unanimously.

No one said the man is perfect or that he never made a few mistakes, but there is no reason to believe that Mueller is anything other than a non-partisan consummate professional. To argue otherwise is really disingenuous. But hey, its you.
 
Last edited:
Mueller ain’t a judge.

Bizarre that one of the people who lied us into Iraq gets so must have support from the leftists.
What's actually bizarre is that you continuously foist this bizarre argument, as if it has to do with the price of bread. Generically speaking, this might be the lamest of your argument "types", and that's saying something.
 
Curious. There are a number of posts describing mueller’s so called integrity.

A critical thinker then rebuts the claims.

The critical thinker is then attacked.

Curious.
 
Mueller is on record saying that he likes butterscotch more than chocolate, he can't be trusted!!
 
Curious. There are a number of posts describing mueller’s so called integrity.

A critical thinker then rebuts the claims.

The critical thinker is then attacked.

Curious.

He was selected because of all the support he had received from republicans in his career made him someone the party would accept.

Sounds like the republican party has an integrity problem.

If republicans
 
Folks, you do not have to be a lawyer to know that Mueller did not provide the Flynn 302.

do your own research folks, for once.

just read the links i have provided.

think for yourselves

Folks, you do not have to be a rocket scientist to know that if the judge is unhappy with what Mueller provided, he will say so!

think for oneself...

you have the order.

you have the response that violates the order.

do not worry about what the judge does.

get pissed off

we empower ourselves to judge the judges.

ones must think for oneself

Mueller ain’t a judge.

Bizarre that one of the people who lied us into Iraq gets so must have support from the leftists.


Curious. There are a number of posts describing mueller’s so called integrity.

A critical thinker then rebuts the claims.

The critical thinker is then attacked.

Curious.

WHATABOUTISM-45.jpg
 
Trump Tweets

“It looks here as though General Flynn’s defenses are incidental to something larger which is for the prosecution to figure out if it can find a path to Donald Trump without quite knowing what that crime might be. It stops looking like prosecution and more looking like......

....a persecution of the President.” Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal. Thank you, people are starting to see and understand what this Witch Hunt is all about. Jeff Sessions should be ashamed of himself for allowing this total HOAX to get started in the first place!

"The Russian Witch Hunt Hoax, started as the “insurance policy” long before I even got elected, is very bad for our Country. They are Entrapping people for misstatements, lies or unrelated things that took place many years ago. Nothing to do with Collusion. A Democrat Scam!

One reason that it's pretty likely that Mueller will come up with evidence that Trump was personally involved in the Russian collusion is that Trump is so damned worried that he will. And of course, all of his sycophants and turd polishers are, too -- as well they should be.
 
Folks, you do not have to be a lawyer to know that Mueller did not provide the Flynn 302.

do your own research folks, for once.

just read the links i have provided.

think for yourselves

Maybe you should show us how it's done by putting your Deep State conspiracy theory in the form of at least a coherent narrative rather than vague insinuations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom