Status
Not open for further replies.
Now we have Trump under investigation, and he rants endlessly about "witch hunts". If Clinton was relatively silent on Twitter about Benghazi and she was cleared, then why doesn't Trump follow the same lead and remain silent on Twitter about the Russian investigation?


"You have the right to remain silent. What you lack, is the capacity."
Another similarity between Trump and a loud-mouthed ass (donkey).
 
I've heard of grasping at straws but....

Seriously.

Amen, we went from "colluding with Russia" to "prosecuting some crank conspiracy theorist for lying to the FBI because he might not have instantly remembered some perfectly legal thing he did two years ago."

Good point!
 
Amen, we went from "colluding with Russia" to "prosecuting some crank conspiracy theorist for lying to the FBI because he might not have instantly remembered some perfectly legal thing he did two years ago."

Good point!

Er no. It's not the perfectly legal acts* performed by Trump's campaign that are of concern. It's the conspiracy with Russia.
 
Amen, we went from "colluding with Russia" to "prosecuting some crank conspiracy theorist for lying to the FBI because he might not have instantly remembered some perfectly legal thing he did two years ago."

Good point!
Except of course that "perfectly legal thing" might not actually have been perfectly legal. Because, you know... foreign influence in an election and all.

As for "not instantly remembering"... the Russian investigation has played a major part in political discussions long before Mueller was appointed. And given the impact of wikileaks on the election, anyone having interacted with them (even though an intermediary) would probably have remembered "Oh yeah, I talked to Assange". Claiming that its just a case of "not instantly remembering" strains credibility.

Its not like they were asking "Where were you on the night of June 23, 1989", some detail that cold easily be forgotten.
 
Er no. It's not the perfectly legal acts* performed by Trump's campaign that are of concern. It's the conspiracy with Russia.

Yet, that ain't what they are charging Corsi, or anybody else with. Just a single count of lying to the FBI.
 
Amen, we went from "colluding with Russia" to "prosecuting some crank conspiracy theorist for lying to the FBI because he might not have instantly remembered some perfectly legal thing he did two years ago."

Good point!

Ahem... what did you just write a couple of weeks ago about intentionally misconstruing a poster's point?
 
Yet, that ain't what they are charging Corsi, or anybody else with. Just a single count of lying to the FBI.

Still haven't worked out how plea deals work have you?

And as to him "forgetting", yeah, he just "forgot" that he didn't tell Stone no. He just forgot that he got in touch with contacts in London to get him in contact with Assange. Then he totally just "forgot" that he informed Stone about the fact Wikileaks had the hacked democrat and Podesta emails and were going to start releasing them in October.

I guess it's just as well that Muller has his emails so he can remind him...
 
Still haven't worked out how plea deals work have you?

And as to him "forgetting", yeah, he just "forgot" that he didn't tell Stone no. He just forgot that he got in touch with contacts in London to get him in contact with Assange. Then he totally just "forgot" that he informed Stone about the fact Wikileaks had the hacked democrat and Podesta emails and were going to start releasing them in October.

I guess it's just as well that Muller has his emails so he can remind him...

Nope, I pretty well have, particularly when 1. the point is the charges were lying to the FBI and not colluding with Russia, which was the whole ding dong point and 2. Corsi told the Mueller leftists to get bent because the plea deal was a crock of baloney

so yeah, TBD has figured out how plea deals work.
 
Still haven't worked out how plea deals work have you?

Exactly what I was thinking. They weren't charging him with a single count that's what the plea bargain was for, not what they could have charged him with. Now that this fool is climbing up on his attention seeking horse he will see what they have against him in its entirety.

And as to him "forgetting", yeah, he just "forgot" that he didn't tell Stone no.

I have never, in my life, seen so many people with such terrible memories. I can't believe the Trump suckers supporters continue to buy that ****. The coincidence involved in so many people forgetting issues specifically related Russia is outstanding.
 
Last edited:
Nope, I pretty well have, particularly when 1. the point is the charges were lying to the FBI and not colluding with Russia, which was the whole ding dong point and 2. Corsi told the Mueller leftists to get bent because the plea deal was a crock of baloney

so yeah, TBD has figured out how plea deals work.

Hahaha that would hold more water if any of the legal analysis you have provided was correct. So far you're 0 for....everything.
 
Nope, I pretty well have

Strangely, I don't believe you

particularly when

1. the point is the charges were lying to the FBI and not colluding with Russia, which was the whole ding dong point

You need to recheck the mandate of the Muller Investigation. Its mandate is to look into Russian interference in the Election. So yeah, lying about your involvement in that interference is core to the Investigation. Conspiracy to Defraud the USA by the Trump campaign working with Wikileaks and Russia is secondary to that.

and

2. Corsi told the Mueller leftists to get bent because the plea deal was a crock of baloney

You do realise that the documents that Muller sent to Corsi with the plea agreements include the very emails that Corsi sent to Stone and others showing that he did exact what Muller says that he did, the very things that Cosri told the FBI he didn't do?

so yeah, TBD has figured out how plea deals work.

Nope, I don't think that you do.
 
Exactly what I was thinking. They weren't charging him with a single count that's what the plea bargain was for, not what they could have charged him with. Now that this fool is climbing up on his attention seeking horse he will see what they have against him in its entirety.

Exactly!

I have never, in my life, seen so many people with such terrible memories. I can't believe the Trump suckers supporters continue to buy that ****. The coincidence involved in so many people forgetting issues specifically related Russia is outstanding.

I know, it's almost like the Reagan Administration all over again. Weapons? I don't remember any weapons? Contras? Who are they? I don't recall. Iran you say, I don't remember any Iran....
 
Er no. It's not the perfectly legal acts* performed by Trump's campaign that are of concern. It's the conspiracy with Russia.

Yet, that ain't what they are charging Corsi, or anybody else with. Just a single count of lying to the FBI.

Strangely, I don't believe you

particularly when
.

Hi! I ain't saying that you can't butt into a conversation I was having with someone else, but when y'all at least try not to pervert the original discussion to try to score some silly point that just ends up blowing up in one's face, you dig?

Mayhaps you want to start over.
 
Nope, I pretty well have, particularly when 1. the point is the charges were lying to the FBI and not colluding with Russia, which was the whole ding dong point and 2. Corsi told the Mueller leftists to get bent because the plea deal was a crock of baloney

so yeah, TBD has figured out how plea deals work.

:dl:

You honestly think that was the only charge they could bring against him?
 
:DL:

You honestly think that was the only charge they could bring against him?

That was the only charge listed in the plea, and given their track record, I am going to have to say that the whole Russia interference is coming up a big goose egg for Mueller thus far.

Can things change? maybe, I hear tell they are digging around trying to discover who was working with Fusion to gin up some claims before the election...
 
Still haven't worked out how plea deals work have you?

And as to him "forgetting", yeah, he just "forgot" that he didn't tell Stone no. He just forgot that he got in touch with contacts in London to get him in contact with Assange. Then he totally just "forgot" that he informed Stone about the fact Wikileaks had the hacked democrat and Podesta emails and were going to start releasing them in October.

I guess it's just as well that Muller has his emails so he can remind him...


Right? How many questionable interactions do you need to engage in per year before you start forgetting ones that occurred only 2 years ago?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom