Mueller Investigation pt 6

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trump Tweets

Bob Mueller was a great HERO to the Radical Left Democrats. Now that the Mueller Report is finished, with a finding of NO COLLUSION & NO OBSTRUCTION (based on a review of Report by our highly respected A.G.), the Dems are going around saying, “Bob who, sorry, don’t know the man.”
 
Captain_Swoop said:
Trump Tweets

Bob Mueller was a great HERO to the Radical Left Democrats. Now that the Mueller Report is finished, with a finding of NO COLLUSION & NO OBSTRUCTION (based on a review of Report by our highly respected A.G.), the Dems are going around saying, “Bob who, sorry, don’t know the man.”
Click to expand...

The irony of that post considering his ever changing memory of things like Wikileaks, etc.
 
Captain_Swoop said:
Trump Tweets

Bob Mueller was a great HERO to the Radical Left Democrats. Now that the Mueller Report is finished, with a finding of NO COLLUSION & NO OBSTRUCTION (based on a review of Report by our highly respected A.G.)
Click to expand...
Who is this "highly respected A.G." Trump is referring to? I thought Barr was the A.G. (a man who is wildly viewed as a partisan hack and who got confirmed thanks to Republican's lack of integrity.)
 
thaiboxerken said:
I think it's less about Trump and more about protecting his own credibility as a legal expert.
Click to expand...

Yeah.

Judge Napolitano has never not spoken his mind, even if it meant cozying up with conspiracy theorists and speaking out against the Bush administration.

His comments against Trump aren't all that surprising, or at least shouldn't be if you know his history.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Again the point was it will be interesting to learn about these facts that lead Barr to his statement. I don't think it will be productive to have a debate over who has the more trustworthy statements to Congress. I'm only interested in the nature of the facts to be revealed at some point.
Click to expand...

Well, we can see if an investigation turns up anything nefarious, but that has little to do with your silly comment that Barr wouldn't spin in front of Congress because of the dire consequences.


Conspiracy theories and hypotheiticals? I think there's a section somewhere for those.

Chris B.
Click to expand...

What conspiracy theories or hypotheticals? Surely, you know that Kushner and others have financial stakes in foreign nations, yes? And that there are reports that a denial of Kushner's security clearance was overturned?

Neither Upchurch nor I drew any conclusions from those two statements. The two are sufficient for concern over how such clearances have been granted.
 
phiwum said:
What conspiracy theories or hypotheticals? Surely, you know that Kushner and others have financial stakes in foreign nations, yes? And that there are reports that a denial of Kushner's security clearance was overturned?

Neither Upchurch nor I drew any conclusions from those two statements. The two are sufficient for concern over how such clearances have been granted.
Click to expand...

I did draw one conclusion. Anyone who still thinks Clinton sold uranium to the Russians as part of the Uranium One deal is lost in an already debunked CT.
 
Upchurch said:
I did draw one conclusion. Anyone who still thinks Clinton sold uranium to the Russians as part of the Uranium One deal is lost in an already debunked CT.
Click to expand...

I know "the right" isn't a huge fan of Mr. John Oliver, but he did a thorough and complete debunking of that nonsense. It was really good, and very entertaining. I didn't watch this link, but I'm pretty sure it's the correct one if anyone wants to see it.

 
plague311 said:
I know "the right" isn't a huge fan of Mr. John Oliver, but he did a thorough and complete debunking of that nonsense. It was really good, and very entertaining. I didn't watch this link, but I'm pretty sure it's the correct one if anyone wants to see it.

Click to expand...

So much stuff that he talked about in 2016 turns out to be real issues... the

Trump Foundation... BUSTED
Trump University... BUSTED


And on what planet is a trust run by your family members a blind trust?
 
plague311 said:
I know "the right" isn't a huge fan of Mr. John Oliver, but he did a thorough and complete debunking of that nonsense. It was really good, and very entertaining. I didn't watch this link, but I'm pretty sure it's the correct one if anyone wants to see it.

Click to expand...

I remember Rachel Maddow go over it in excruciating detail.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
You know, I don't consider an endless argument with multiple opponents about hypothetical situations productive. Time consuming yes, productive no.

Chris B.
Click to expand...

Huh. That’s almost exactly what Zig said when he tried to argue that Obama is a thin-skinned narcissist but then couldn’t. Of course, he’d say “couldn’t” and “didn’t” are different things, but you know, Hitchen’s Razor. Put up or shut up.
 
applecorped said:
Awwww. Lol.
Click to expand...

Huh. That guy who never says anything but "Lol" said "Lol" again.

Has anybody ever asked this guy what he wants?

Because great entertainment this ain't. I've seen better entertainment on the inside of bubble gum wrappers.
 
plague311 said:
She does well, but she doesn't make me chuckle like John.
Click to expand...

No, she doesn't.

Oliver and his writers are amazing. His show explains some pretty dense subjects and makes you laugh. That has to be hard to do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom