Mueller Investigation pt 6

[Craig4]

trump repeatedly tries to pivot the whole thing round on to Hilary and the Dems.

I just saw where the stupid bitch doesn't want Mueller to testify. This should be fun. I do so love it when Trump suffers. His pain is funny and makes me happy.

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

I just saw where the stupid bitch doesn't want Mueller to testify. This should be fun. I do so love it when Trump suffers. His pain is funny and makes me happy.

You just saw that as in Trump said it? Or have you read something few others have?

 

[a_unique_person]

You just saw that as in Trump said it? Or have you read something few others have?

Twitter.



https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/05/politics/mueller-testify-house-judiciary-committee/index.html


Trump is acting like a deranged two year old.

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

Twitter.



https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/05/politics/mueller-testify-house-judiciary-committee/index.html


Trump is acting like a deranged two year old.

Ah, I see. Quotes and an attribute would have been useful.

 

[smartcooky]

The Trump admin's outright resistance to acknowledging this happened or addressing the issue is major problem. We know they attempted to access at least 21 voter databases.

Republican & Trumpista response

 

[Andy_Ross]

I have noticed quite a few comments starting to appear on Twitter saying Trump should get two extra years on this term to make up for those 'lost' to the investigation.
Even Trump himself hinted at it in a tweet

 

[The Great Zaganza]

I have noticed quite a few comments starting to appear on Twitter saying Trump should get two extra years on this term to make up for those 'lost' to the investigation.
Even Trump himself hinted at it in a tweet

Hey, Trump gets unlimited Mulligans in Golf!

Why should his Presidency be any different?

 

[uke2se]

I have noticed quite a few comments starting to appear on Twitter saying Trump should get two extra years on this term to make up for those 'lost' to the investigation.
Even Trump himself hinted at it in a tweet

It's the new talking point designed to trigger the libs. Don't bother with it. Just shake your head and walk away.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Trump Tweets

“Democrat Texas Congressman Al Green says impeachment is the only thing that can prevent President Trump from re-election in 2020.” @OANN In other words, Dems can’t win the election fairly. You can’t impeach a president for creating the best economy in our country’s history.....

.....Also, there are “No High Crimes & Misdemeanors,” No Collusion, No Conspiracy, No Obstruction. ALL THE CRIMES ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE, and that’s what the Dems should be looking at, but they won’t. Nevertheless, the tables are turning!

 

[Upchurch]

Trump Tweets

[...]In other words, Dems can’t win the election fairly.[...]

When the Republicans have hostile foreign governments sponsoring them, no, they probably can't win. But then, the problem isn't how Dems campaign, is it?

 

[Crossbow]

Trump Tweets

“Democrat Texas Congressman Al Green says impeachment is the only thing that can prevent President Trump from re-election in 2020.” @OANN In other words, Dems can’t win the election fairly. You can’t impeach a president for creating the best economy in our country’s history.....

.....Also, there are “No High Crimes & Misdemeanors,” No Collusion, No Conspiracy, No Obstruction. ALL THE CRIMES ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE, and that’s what the Dems should be looking at, but they won’t. Nevertheless, the tables are turning!

Oh Jesus Cow Tipping Christ!

Is there ever even just one day where Trump does not try to pick a fight with someone?

 

[newyorkguy]

Moved - wrong thread.

 

[Upchurch]

So, about these bits of conversation:

I know people like my brother were telling me that once the Mueller Report came out, i'd start hating him too, and I agreed that when it did, and he was charged with a crime, i'd turn on Trump in a heartbeat.

Is your "turn on Trump in a heartbeat" contingent on whether Mueller found that evidence that Trump committed a crime or merely upon the Special Council's ability to charge Trump with a crime? If the former, you should feel free to start turning now, because that's what the report is saying. If the latter, then that is pretty safe way of saying that you would never turn on Trump, no matter what the facts are.

and this:

I would care a lot more if...
[snip]
... Trump were actually abusing his powers in some way; or
[snip]

You are now the second poster on this board that I have seen make a statement equivalent to, “if Trump has committed a crime, I would turn against him.” Both of you have said this after the report was released, outlining Trump’s crimes. The condition has been met. Where is the follow through on the consequence?

Bump. What about it? Conditions met or move the goal posts?

 

[wareyin]

370 DOJ alumni with up to four decades of service with the department wrote that special counsel Robert Mueller’s report — a redacted version of which was publicly released last month — formed a case for obstruction against the president for which there is “overwhelming” evidence.

Yet the Trump defenders will still claim that Mueller found no crime.


eta: The Letter itself is an even better read. "Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice."

 

[phiwum]

370 DOJ alumni with up to four decades of service with the department wrote that special counsel Robert Mueller’s report — a redacted version of which was publicly released last month — formed a case for obstruction against the president for which there is “overwhelming” evidence.

Yet the Trump defenders will still claim that Mueller found no crime.


eta: The Letter itself is an even better read. "Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice."

Well, yeah, former DOJ folk. The deep state that Trump has cleaned out, duh. Buncha angry Democrats and maybe an occasional very conflicted (so-called) Republican.

 

[smartcooky]

Well, yeah, former DOJ folk. The deep state that Trump has cleaned out, duh. Buncha angry Democrats and maybe an occasional very conflicted (so-called) Republican.

More than just occasional

I count well over half of the signatories (the number has now grown to 467) worked for the Republican administrations of Nixon, Reagan, and Bush 1 & 2 (in some cases, more than one of them.


https://www.dropbox.com/s/fte3vv5kxkuzfiq/ExDOJ-signatories.txt?dl=1

 

[The Man]

I have noticed quite a few comments starting to appear on Twitter saying Trump should get two extra years on this term to make up for those 'lost' to the investigation.
Even Trump himself hinted at it in a tweet

Yet also said, in the same tweet, in those same two "lost" years he was the best (or was it most successful?) president in history. Finding success in the years you lost, even M Night Shyamalan couldn't write schlock like that.

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

Yet also said, in the same tweet, in those same two "lost" years he was the best (or was it most successful?) president in history. Finding success in the years you lost, even M Night Shyamalan couldn't write schlock like that.

He lost two years of adulation and worship by the masses.

 

[The Man]

He can't keep straight how many angry Democrats were involved either.

Sorry for the crappy video

 

[Fast Eddie B]

...even M Night Shyamalan couldn't write schlock like that.

If it was M Night Shyamalan...

...we’d find out he was the most successful president in the history of the universe...and he was dead the whole time!