• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Moving On is coming.

i made a very sexy motive thread.....doesnt prove guilt though.. none the less interesting...

going back to unocal having the taleban over to texas in 95 to try and sweet talk them into permitting the oil pipeline.....

the deal turned sour in 98.......thus begins the EVIL taleban saga..
So, how's that pipeline coming along?
 
With integrity you can disregard all of that and the other items that have been raised by researchers?

Yes I can. What "researchers"?

And then take the extra step of ridiculing people who have questions under the guise of "no evidence"?

Nobody is ridiculing you. And you have no evidence.

My belief after my brief time here is that some are blindly supporting the people who did this.

Show me proof, real proof, that other people than al Qaeda terrorists committed the crimes of 9/11.

Those people you are defending are relentlessly working at demolishing all of the rights and values you believe in. Read the list of the laws passed since 9/11 carefully. Apply them to yourself. Then read from top to bottom Rebuilding America's Defenses to see its predictive abilities and to get a glimpse of what is yet to come.

You seem to be afraid of your government, and it's not helping you think objectively.

The mind slammed shut is impervious to reason.

Indeed.
 
Ashgabat, 27 September 2006

In the initial phase of TAP, Pakistan was less than enthusiastic.

Turkmenistan was looking toward India for sharing the volumes to get the project going. For various reasons, India kept shilly-shallying with the question for far too long.

Afghanistan has not come up with a plan to guarantee the security of the pipeline through its territory.

Russia is making all efforts to retain monopoly rights on Turkmen gas.

newscentralasia.com/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=1883

There, add the beginning and read the whole article. Add to it the huge Afghan revolution which at one point had allowed the Taliban to retake the whole Southern half of the country just a few months ago. Seems the only reason that there isn't a pipeline yet is because the Bush Admin half-a***** the job in Afghanistan.

BTW, where are the #1 & #2 9/11 suspects at? Are they hiding in the same tunnel with Saddam's WMD's in Syria?
 
BTW, where are the #1 & #2 9/11 suspects at? Are they hiding in the same tunnel with Saddam's WMD's in Syria?
The number 2 9/11 suspect has been in US custody for some time now.


Guess the pipeline wasn't all that important apparently...
 
The number 2 9/11 suspect has been in US custody for some time now.


Guess the pipeline wasn't all that important apparently...


And what evidence has been brought forth to support his involvement? A trial? Should be pretty open and shut case, right?

So let me rephrase my question :

Where is Bin Laden & Zawahiri? And Saddam's WMD's if you happen to know that one too.
 
Also, as for your pipeline comment, perhaps you are somewhat lacking in the reading comprehension department. The pipeline is a go. It would probably exist right now if it wasn't for the Indian, Pakistan, and Russian governments. Because of their initial reluctance, we made Iraq the primary objective and pushed Afghanistan to the secondary. Naturally the ultimate prize is all that Iranian oil.

MSNBC "Airlift of Evil"

By Michael Moran
MSNBC

NEW YORK, Nov. 29, 2001 — The United States took the unprecedented step this week of demanding that foreign airlines provide information on passengers boarding planes for America. Yet in the past week, a half dozen or more Pakistani air force cargo planes landed in the Taliban-held city of Kunduz and evacuated to Pakistan hundreds of non-Afghan soldiers who fought alongside the Taliban and even al-Qaida against the United States.






Care to explain?
 
Also, as for your pipeline comment, perhaps you are somewhat lacking in the reading comprehension department. The pipeline is a go. It would probably exist right now if it wasn't for the Indian, Pakistan, and Russian governments. Because of their initial reluctance, we made Iraq the primary objective and pushed Afghanistan to the secondary. Naturally the ultimate prize is all that Iranian oil.
But it was so important that the gov't was willing to kill 3,000 Americans for it? Then surely it would be a simple thing to turn Afghanistan into a sheet of glass to build it! Why hasn't this been done?
 
And what evidence has been brought forth to support his involvement? A trial? Should be pretty open and shut case, right?

So let me rephrase my question :

Where is Bin Laden & Zawahiri? And Saddam's WMD's if you happen to know that one too.
OBL and Zawahiri are most likely in the tribal areas of Pakistan.

Saddam's WMD's are in a room that also contains all of the evidence for your conspiracy theory, whatever that may be.
 
Also, as for your pipeline comment, perhaps you are somewhat lacking in the reading comprehension department. The pipeline is a go. It would probably exist right now if it wasn't for the Indian, Pakistan, and Russian governments. Because of their initial reluctance, we made Iraq the primary objective and pushed Afghanistan to the secondary. Naturally the ultimate prize is all that Iranian oil.

MSNBC "Airlift of Evil"

By Michael Moran
MSNBC

NEW YORK, Nov. 29, 2001 — The United States took the unprecedented step this week of demanding that foreign airlines provide information on passengers boarding planes for America. Yet in the past week, a half dozen or more Pakistani air force cargo planes landed in the Taliban-held city of Kunduz and evacuated to Pakistan hundreds of non-Afghan soldiers who fought alongside the Taliban and even al-Qaida against the United States.






Care to explain?

You're quoting an opinion piece as if it were fact? If you read the article, there is plenty of insinuation, little no evidence. In addition, if it were true, what exactly would be the harm in the US allowing a few members of the Taliban to escape to Pakistan in order to recieve Pakistan's support? What exactly does that prove?
 
But it was so important that the gov't was willing to kill 3,000 Americans for it? Then surely it would be a simple thing to turn Afghanistan into a sheet of glass to build it! Why hasn't this been done?


Yes.

And nuking Afghanistan would make it a real desirable location, wouldn't it?
 
10) The fact that 3 buildings within two blocks collapsed under circumstances that have not been fully explained in detail.

Correction: Four buildings collapsed completely (of which two who have undergone extensive investigation, and one is still in the process of being investigated), two nearly collapsed completely and one collapsed partially.
 
You're quoting an opinion piece as if it were fact? If you read the article, there is plenty of insinuation, little no evidence. In addition, if it were true, what exactly would be the harm in the US allowing a few members of the Taliban to escape to Pakistan in order to recieve Pakistan's support? What exactly does that prove?


Taliban & Al Qaeda. And while that is an opinion piece, the fact of it is that the US did allow Pakistan to fly thousands of unidentified Afghans, some believed to be Taliban & Al Qaeda fighters, out of the country before the invasion. That is a fact.

So where is Mullah Omar and company? Bin Laden & company?

And if you don't think it's a big deal then you should really find new news sources, go to the AP and read about Afghanistan daily. They you will have been informed of the huge Taliban resurgence which allowed them to regain control over the entire souther half of the country.

So what is the harm again? Just a few more flag draped coffins, nothing major huh?
 
You're quoting an opinion piece as if it were fact? If you read the article, there is plenty of insinuation, little no evidence. In addition, if it were true, what exactly would be the harm in the US allowing a few members of the Taliban to escape to Pakistan in order to recieve Pakistan's support? What exactly does that prove?

An op-ed piece from '01 no less.
 
Ha ha ha!!! That makes my a Hitler lover?!!! Ha ha ha!!!

Btw, the Judicial.biz part. do you know why I asked that question at the time?

Holocaust denial has even less evidence behind it than your "j00s did WTC" nonsense. Holocaust denial exists only for the pourpose of politically rehabilitating naziism.

You used the LC forums to diseminate nazi propaganda. You did it knowingly, willfully and with malice aforethought.
 

Back
Top Bottom