epepke
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,264
hgc said:There was no way that the aesthetic that worked so well in with Cary Grant and Grace Kelly in To Catch a Thief was going to fly with Paul Newman and Julie Andrews in the 60's.
Good point, and yet I don't know--North by Northwest seems to me in some way I can't explain far less dated than Frenzy. I think that in the latter he may have been trying too hard to update himself.
Also good point on Torn Curtain. But, like Topaz, I think that a lot of the problems were with things that he often got right but just didn't. At his best, Hitchcock was almost laconic. Topaz relied far too heavily on a plethora of false-suspense subplots that seemed to get glossed over later with dialogue.
I think that Hitchcock at his best was so very good that people tend to gloss over the times when he, well, wasn't. Psycho, for example, has what is probably the worst ending in the history of film. It's so bad that people block it out and don't even remember it existed. I also think that, maybe, some wise televisors decided to cut it. For those who have so forgotten, after the insanely great "Mother" scene, there's a good two reels of some dipweed spouting pseudo-Freudian gibberish in court. What's that supposed to tell us? That Norman was nuts? Think we already figured that out?