• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

More top truther science!

T.A.M. said:
Does anyone remember the RPG Top Secret. It came in a box set. I am convinced these people think the world is like one big game of "Top Secret". Reading that Killtown post has me convinced that he is still a child playing this game.

Incredible

TAM
Click to expand...

I think they're all playing the RPG Paranoia
 
defaultdotxbe said:
in case anyone in wondering the worlds fastest high speed camera records 200,000,000 frames per second, which is 1 picture every 5 nanoseconds

it costs $450,000
Click to expand...

They need a LOT of light as you can imagine. Wikipedia says something about cameras with "temporal resolution" of 50,000,000,000 frames per second (link).
 
Yall are definitely on to something with quotes. CTs say crazy things all the time. If you want to deconstruct a conspiracist, just gather together some of the things he's said over a period of time, as I did with Alex Jones. Just collect a bunch of quotes and list them. It has a truly mindblowing effect.
 
Whats the matter with you guys? Didn't you see the tracks of the rocket
sleds used to propell the planes into the WTC? It looked just like the
Sandia tests - I mean those planes flew right into the building. Something
no trained airline pilot would do .......
 
njslim said:
Whats the matter with you guys? Didn't you see the tracks of the rocket
sleds used to propell the planes into the WTC? It looked just like the
Sandia tests - I mean those planes flew right into the building. Something
no trained airline pilot would do .......
Click to expand...

*LOL* Bolding mine... :D
 
maccy said:
From a thread at LC talking about the no-planes theory:



http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=1128&view=findpost&p=9531482

I think I've found something for my signature.
Click to expand...

I have a camera, I wish it would take a pictures before I knew I wanted to take the picture. And if it would just take a few pictures a second I would love it!

This is great, post of total idiots. If they knew I was antipodean would they ban me for being incredibly stupid?

Good stuff. Funny stuff, great post
 
Me said:
The first law of thermodynamics states that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Kinetic energy doesn't go away. Something happens to it. It doesn't just get "absorbed", and the story is over.
Click to expand...

Chris Sarns said:
Thermo referes to heat, not kinetic energy!

Kinetic energy is the energy of motion. An object which has motion - whether it be vertical or horizontal motion - has kinetic energy.
Click to expand...


Good old Chris explaining to me why the first law of thermodynamics doesn't apply to kinetic energy.
 
PerryLogan said:
Yall are definitely on to something with quotes. CTs say crazy things all the time. If you want to deconstruct a conspiracist, just gather together some of the things he's said over a period of time, as I did with Alex Jones. Just collect a bunch of quotes and list them. It has a truly mindblowing effect.
Click to expand...
Ahh.... that's what Ed Murrow did to Joe McCarthy. A commentary-free programme consisting entirely of McCarthy quotes.
 
Retrograde said:
Did the steelworkers who built them know? Or were they in on the conspiracy too?
Click to expand...

Some would argue that the buildings were constructed with reinforced concrete cores all the way up and demolition charges embedded within the concrete.

So, on that basis, the construction workers were definately in on it and someone should take a serious look at their daywork vouchers.

:D:D
 
Some people have cameras that are very fast and can take numerous photos in nanoseconds.
Click to expand...
I have taken numerous photos in nanoseconds all the time and my camera isn't what I would call fast.

I think the best I have done is about 4 pictures in 5,000,000,000 nanoseconds. I'm sure if I had auto-advance I could do better.
 
D@MN! Killtown just revealed the truth about shanksville!

If the Shanksville dirt was hard
687474702s70686s746s73312r626p6s676765722r636s6q2s626p6s676765722s373530382s313630352s3332302s706p616r652q63726173682r706r67
Click to expand...
http://killtown.blogspot.com/
 
This is more technology that science per se, but here's a good quote from their discussion of the moon landing:

That's what I thought. The moon is only 3 days away...it SHOULD be easy. It's certainly possible. But can you imagine the political fallout if the lander failed to lift off, and 3 guys got stuck on the moon and died?
Click to expand...

I guess in all his "research" he never noticed that only two of the three actually went down to the surface.
 
Horatius said:
This is more technology that science per se, but here's a good quote from their discussion of the moon landing:

That's what I thought. The moon is only 3 days away...it SHOULD be easy. It's certainly possible. But can you imagine the political fallout if the lander failed to lift off, and 3 guys got stuck on the moon and died?
Click to expand...

I guess in all his "research" he never noticed that only two of the three actually went down to the surface.
Click to expand...

Would that political fallout have been more or less than the fallout from three guys dying on the launchpad during a test run? Or from 7 people exploding at 100,000 feet? Or from another 7 burning up on re-entry?

Is there any field in wich these guys aren't utterly ignorant?

BTW, before anyone says it, yes I am aware of the conspiracy theory that Christa MacCauliffe was murdered to keep her from telling people you can see stars in space.
 
Horatius said:
This is more technology that science per se, but here's a good quote from their discussion of the moon landing:

That's what I thought. The moon is only 3 days away...it SHOULD be easy. It's certainly possible. But can you imagine the political fallout if the lander failed to lift off, and 3 guys got stuck on the moon and died?
Click to expand...
I guess in all his "research" he never noticed that only two of the three actually went down to the surface.
Click to expand...
I think you're quibbling, here. There were many circumstances under which all three men could have been stranded (in the early missions they spent considerably more time in space than on the Moon).

The point is that "can you imagine the political fallout?" Well, sure, but that's like claiming there is no war or American occupation in Iraq because "can you imagine the political fallout if it turned out to be a complete and utter shambles?"

The political fallout would have been quite substantial, and everybody was fully aware of the potential consequences of disaster. That's why Nixon had a speech prepared in the event of the men being unable to return. Mike Collins, the CMP on Apollo 11 has spoken or written about his full awareness of, if the LEM crashed, having to go back home alone.


Course, all that stuff was just made up as if they really went to the moon.....
 
Larry Lovage said:
The political fallout would have been quite substantial, and everybody was fully aware of the potential consequences of disaster. That's why Nixon had a speech prepared in the event of the men being unable to return. Mike Collins, the CMP on Apollo 11 has spoken or written about his full awareness of, if the LEM crashed, having to go back home alone.


Course, all that stuff was just made up as if they really went to the moon.....
Click to expand...

All the CMPs, during Apollo, trained for the possibility of returning to Earth without the other astronauts. Simulated re-entry without the other astronauts was one of the hardest parts of the job. Not just from the technical aspect, but also the psychological. However, it was something that had to be done.

Frank Borman's wife was so convinced that Apollo 8 would not return (due to the TEI burn not going well) that she prepared a press release, and told Chris Kraft that NASA would "ruin the moon for everyone."
 
Larry Lovage said:
I think you're quibbling, here. There were many circumstances under which all three men could have been stranded (in the early missions they spent considerably more time in space than on the Moon).
Click to expand...

Yeahbut....this thread is about their bad science, not their bad sociology. While there may have been error modes that would strand all three, the LEM failing to take off wouldn't be one of them. And there's certainly no way all three could be stranded "on" the moon. In orbit around it, yes, but not on it.

It's just another example of how they don't know even the most basic facts of what they are discussing.
 
I cannot quote a top troother statement to sum up this movement because there are too many stupid statements to pick from, but I have found this.

http://www.freewebs.com/democraatus/

This is pure gold and must rank as one of the most stupid and mad attempts to prove NIST wrong.

Enjoy and please try not to laugh too hard.This is what you call bad science.

(It involves building a paper Tower and dropping a bucket of water on it, need I say more!)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom