• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

More Remote Viewing...

evilgoldtoesock said:

Errrrrrm is there a particular reason why both the predicted numbers and the results thread are posted after the date of the draw ?

On that basis I am going to *ahem* "Remote View" the numbers for the UK National Lottery draw made on 17 April 2004

[presses fingers to temples] 3......21.......31........42.......47 and 48 [/presses fingers to temples]
 
The Don:

This is laughable. As any reasonably accomplished magician can tell you, "pressing fingers to temples" is an ancient method of misdirection meant to cover up a very mundane explanation of lottery divination.

Parlor tricks, Sir.

Allow me to test you in an environment in which your fingers cannot reach your temples and I guarantee you will not be able to predict even yesterday's lottery numbers.

Oh, such levels of foolishness we see in this world...
 
"Randi who?

You have got to be kidding me!

This is simply beneath my work. I never involve myself in witch-hunts of any kind. My work is proof enough. I have to wonder about the true motives of those who claim that they are not yet convinced.

DR is correct assuming that I have no interest whatsoever in Randi's money. So far as the scientific community is concerned, a friend and mathematics professor at an American University is now reviewing my work."

from www.ummo.cc
 
evilgoldtoesock said:
"Randi who?

You have got to be kidding me!

This is simply beneath my work. I never involve myself in witch-hunts of any kind. My work is proof enough. I have to wonder about the true motives of those who claim that they are not yet convinced.

DR is correct assuming that I have no interest whatsoever in Randi's money. So far as the scientific community is concerned, a friend and mathematics professor at an American University is now reviewing my work."

from www.ummo.cc
I like you, evilsock.

You're Kwaaaaaazy.
 
It’s a fact that in parapsychology as controls get tighter and more competent researchers become involved that the overall effect decreases to nothing but chance!

Q: !Xx+-Rational-+xX! where do you get this information for your assertion!?
A: The burden of proof isn’t on me because I’m a skeptic the burden of proof is on believers!
 

Back
Top Bottom