• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

More proof emerges that Obama is in Radical Bill Ayer's pocket...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/04/ayers-demonstrates-agains_n_380108.html

Ok, no matter what you think of Obama's Afghan policy, little did anyone think that it would be constructed so as to hide the fact that Obama is in an active conspiracy with Bill Ayers to radically socialize the country. How cynical can they be? Fortunately, I've the power to see through such silly machinations.
Obviously, Bill Ayers wants all that Afghan oil with which to make his fortune. :rolleyes:

DR
 
Don't wrench out your back pummeling that strawman, Headscratcher4. Nobody to my knowledge thought that Obama and Ayers were in lockstep on every issue.
 
Don't wrench out your back pummeling that strawman, Headscratcher4. Nobody to my knowledge thought that Obama and Ayers were in lockstep on every issue.
Oooo. Can I play too?

"That's a straw man about a straw man. headscratcher never said that anyone thought that Obama and Ayers were in lockstep on every issue."

Go ask BAC what he thinks the connection between Obama and Ayers is.
 
Don't wrench out your back pummeling that strawman, Headscratcher4. Nobody to my knowledge thought that Obama and Ayers were in lockstep on every issue.

You might want to re-read the comments on the article cited in the OP. Some beauts include

This is propaganda. The whole article is trying to create a distance between Ayers and Obama. We all know that this is false. Billy the pentagon bom ber and O bama are good friends.

The press needs to investigate this. Maybe Obama is paying Ayers to do this to make it look like Obama is NOT socialising with terriorist anymore.

BO's friends turn on him? Why is HP naming him now but during the campaign nothing but silence?
 
OK, this is the Huffington Post were are discussing ...

Fodder for lots of :rolleyes: from the get go.

But the charge that this is a strawman because "nobody" holds this position means that nobody--not even people who put comments on a Huffington Post blog entry--holds that position.

No True Scotsman fallacy? (Nobody except nutters hold that position, therefore it's not legitimate to point out that it's a nutty position?)
 
Don't wrench out your back pummeling that strawman, Headscratcher4. Nobody to my knowledge thought that Obama and Ayers were in lockstep on every issue.

Exactly.

They might not agree on every issue, but they both clearly shared a fondness for domestic terrorism.


(probably)
 
From a couple weeks ago:

2ezu6gn.jpg
 
This is no proof at all they are not close: you might as well argue that if a woman tells her friend that she had a big fight with her husband, they're not really married. It isn't proof they are close, either, but we have here obvious confirmation bias on your part, I think.


OMG!! Obama has a secret gay marriage with Bill Ayers!
 
This is no proof at all they are not close: you might as well argue that if a woman tells her friend that she had a big fight with her husband, they're not really married. It isn't proof they are close, either, but we have here obvious confirmation bias on your part, I think.

Alas, there is so much that confirms the bias on my part.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom