• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

More On Islamic Attacks.

Ya'all must have enjoyed On The Beach. Perhaps under your scenario you Aussies will remain unscathed.

Do you plan on visiting any Indonesian nightclubs with your new Islamic friends? And are you sure dirty magazines will still be ok? If the zealots catch you with one, will they cut off a hand, or an even more private appendage? Have you stocked up on veils for the women? Got enough prayer rugs for everybody?
 
hammegk said:
Ya'all must have enjoyed On The Beach. Perhaps under your scenario you Aussies will remain unscathed.

Do you plan on visiting any Indonesian nightclubs with your new Islamic friends? And are you sure dirty magazines will still be ok? If the zealots catch you with one, will they cut off a hand, or an even more private appendage? Have you stocked up on veils for the women? Got enough prayer rugs for everybody?

I think someone's losing it.
 
Still double-humping your female camels?

Who has the most fun? You, AUP, or Fool?
 
Re: Re: Re: Moron Islamic Attacks

The Fool said:

All of them? Just like desert warriors of 700BC? My neighbour Ahmed doesn't hunt with a bow from the back of a Camel...He drives a Ford to work....Hmmmm, maybe he is only a desert warrior when I'm not looking.
Camel or Ford, it doesn't matter. Teachings are the same. Attitudes the same. Loyalties the same. Goals the same.
Can't think of too many wars won by Islamic nations
I'll save you the effort of thinking. Arabian Peninsula, North Africa, Middle East, Asia Minor, Central Asia, Southern Europe, Malta, the Balkans, Eastern Europe. East Indies
 
Hey Outcast, don't waste your time on the two idiot austrailians, they are both muslim apologists with different tactics:

A Unique Person: When facts about muslims are brought up, instead of dealing with them, he draws moral equivalence with christianity. He also might be a muslim judging by his hatred for jews and his propensity for credulousness.


The Fool: ALWAYS assumes you are talking about all muslims, men women and children, then proceeds to attack that. Also called a strawman. He also might be a muslim and he considers islam a race.
 
Tony said:
Hey Outcast, don't waste your time on the two idiot austrailians, they are both muslim apologists with different tactics:

A Unique Person: When facts about muslims are brought up, instead of dealing with them, he draws moral equivalence with christianity. He also might be a muslim judging by his hatred for jews and his propensity for credulousness.


The Fool: ALWAYS assumes you are talking about all muslims, men women and children, then proceeds to attack that. Also called a strawman. He also might be a muslim and he considers islam a race.
Got it! So where is the 3rd stooge? I was on another website and referred to a certain group of individuals as "raghead." I was called a racist. I ask what race "ragheads" were and I am still waiting for an answer.
 
Outcast said:
Got it! So where is the 3rd stooge? I was on another website and referred to a certain group of individuals as "raghead." I was called a racist. I ask what race "ragheads" were and I am still waiting for an answer.

Rag-head, towel-head, sand-◊◊◊◊◊◊…use pejoratives like these and I’ll join the Fool in condemning your bigotry.

Islam certainly has its problems, and when those problems include fundamentalist theology that justifies murder to pursue political/religious goals, then their problems become the problems of the rest of the world too.

But never forget that even though these fundamentalists draw so much attention to themselves by committing such spectacular atrocities, they still represent only a small fraction of Islam as a whole. The solution is not to condemn all of Islam, but to encourage those practitioners of Islam who are peaceful to condemn and eclipse those who are not.

You can’t accomplish that by condemning all Islamists and calling them rag-heads.
 
Mycroft said:


Rag-head, towel-head, sand-◊◊◊◊◊◊…use pejoratives like these and I’ll join the Fool in condemning your bigotry.

You can’t accomplish that by condemning all Islamists and calling them rag-heads.

Goodness you are raising the bar.:D
 
Mycroft said:


Rag-head, towel-head, sand-◊◊◊◊◊◊…use pejoratives like these and I’ll join the Fool in condemning your bigotry.

Islam certainly has its problems, and when those problems include fundamentalist theology that justifies murder to pursue political/religious goals, then their problems become the problems of the rest of the world too.

But never forget that even though these fundamentalists draw so much attention to themselves by committing such spectacular atrocities, they still represent only a small fraction of Islam as a whole. The solution is not to condemn all of Islam, but to encourage those practitioners of Islam who are peaceful to condemn and eclipse those who are not.

You can’t accomplish that by condemning all Islamists and calling them rag-heads.

Thanks for bringing reason back to this thread.

On the thread´s original topic - the way it appeared in the news over here, the unrest started because Serbs (Christians, as someone else already remarked) torched several mosques, among other things, killed 20-30 muslims, and wounded several hundred more.
 
Mycroft said:


Rag-head, towel-head, sand-◊◊◊◊◊◊…use pejoratives like these and I’ll join the Fool in condemning your bigotry.

Islam certainly has its problems, and when those problems include fundamentalist theology that justifies murder to pursue political/religious goals, then their problems become the problems of the rest of the world too.

But never forget that even though these fundamentalists draw so much attention to themselves by committing such spectacular atrocities, they still represent only a small fraction of Islam as a whole. The solution is not to condemn all of Islam, but to encourage those practitioners of Islam who are peaceful to condemn and eclipse those who are not.

You can’t accomplish that by condemning all Islamists and calling them rag-heads.
Go ahead and call me a bigot if you wish, because I am obstinately and intolerantly devoted to my own opinions and prejudices toward Muslims. I don't believe the fundamentalists that are committing the atrocities are that far from the mainstream. Three thousand Americans die and the Muslim population is dancing in the streets for joy on American graves so to speak. Two hundred Spanish die and not a word condemning the so called radical fundamentalists. I stand by what I said earlier.
The problem is two powerful and aggressive religions, each with the divine truth, cannot coexist. Islam and Christianity have been at war for 1300 years and it continues to this day. Christianity has gone through a Renaissance. We have put our Crusaders and Conquistadors in the museums where they belong. Islam has not gone though a Renaissance. They are essentially unchanged from the desert warriors of 700 AD.
 
Chaos said:


Thanks for bringing reason back to this thread.

On the thread́s original topic - the way it appeared in the news over here, the unrest started because Serbs (Christians, as someone else already remarked) torched several mosques, among other things, killed 20-30 muslims, and wounded several hundred more.
I believe this to be the correct version of what actually started the riots. 'He started to run, but the Serbs set dogs on my son' (16 Mar 04)
That spark came on Tuesday, in Cabra. This dilapidated village of 1,400 Albanians lies on Kosovo's ethnic faultline, which divides the mostly Serb north of the province from the mostly Albanian south. The shells of the clapped-out cars that litter its unpaved roads are only a couple of hundred yards from the front doorsteps of the neighbouring Serb village, Zupce. Between them runs the River Ibar, a frontier that means more than any official border crossing in Kosovo.

On Tuesday, Egzon Deliu (with 3 friends) decided to cross that frontier to spend the afternoon playing on the other side of the line.

"He said that four of them were playing on the other side of the river, when a crowd from the Serb village started shouting insults at them," says his father. "They started to run, but the Serbs set dogs on them and they could not get to the bridge. So they jumped in the river."

According to Fitim, the Ibar, narrow, fast-flowing and bitterly cold, quickly swept away Egzon and another boy, 11-year-old Avni Veseli. Fitim tried to carry his younger brother, Florent, on his back.

"Three times Florent fell off, and on the third time Fitim couldn't rescue him."

Within minutes, hundreds of villagers from Cabra were scouring the river banks, and by midnight they had recovered the body of Egzon Deliu.

On the streets of Cabra, there is no talk of a peaceful solution. "The Serbs don't have human blood," says Minire Deliu, Egzon's cousin. "But they will get what they deserve for this miserable thing they have done."

That process of retribution began almost immediately. Though there has been no independent confirmation of Fitim's story, none was needed. For ethnic Albanians, only Serbs would unleash dogs to chase children to their deaths. "Using dogs was inhuman," says Argim Hassani, Cabra's mayor.
At some point the "extremist factions in the Albanian community" got involved and made a bad situation worse. Though I am pro Serb, I would quickly condemn their actions with the dogs, if this story is true. I do have some questions about the boys story, but questions can never be answered now.
 
Tony said:

The Fool: ALWAYS assumes you are talking about all muslims, men women and children, then proceeds to attack that. Also called a strawman. He also might be a muslim and he considers islam a race.
Lol..... As one of the few posters on this board that has had a post deleted for extreme racist content I hardly think you are in a position to comment....Anyway, happy days it looks like you've got a new playmate.
 
Mycroft said:


Rag-head, towel-head, sand-◊◊◊◊◊◊…use pejoratives like these and I’ll join the Fool in condemning your bigotry.

Islam certainly has its problems, and when those problems include fundamentalist theology that justifies murder to pursue political/religious goals, then their problems become the problems of the rest of the world too.

But never forget that even though these fundamentalists draw so much attention to themselves by committing such spectacular atrocities, they still represent only a small fraction of Islam as a whole. The solution is not to condemn all of Islam, but to encourage those practitioners of Islam who are peaceful to condemn and eclipse those who are not.

You can’t accomplish that by condemning all Islamists and calling them rag-heads.

:clap:
 
Tony said:
Hey Outcast, don't waste your time on the two idiot austrailians, they are both muslim apologists with different tactics:

A Unique Person: When facts about muslims are brought up, instead of dealing with them, he draws moral equivalence with christianity. He also might be a muslim judging by his hatred for jews and his propensity for credulousness.


The Fool: ALWAYS assumes you are talking about all muslims, men women and children, then proceeds to attack that. Also called a strawman. He also might be a muslim and he considers islam a race.

I don't have any great love for the Islamic faith, certainly no more than the other religions around the world. I just don't understand why it is singled out for it's absurdities. Blind criticism of it, while ignoring the 'faith based' crusades of the US is sheer hypocrisy.
 
a_unique_person said:


I don't have any great love for the Islamic faith, certainly no more than the other religions around the world. I just don't understand why it is singled out for it's absurdities. Blind criticism of it, while ignoring the 'faith based' crusades of the US is sheer hypocrisy.
Christians didn't kill 3,000 America on 9-11 to name just one example. What faith base crusades of the US are you talking about?
 

Back
Top Bottom