DanishDynamite
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2001
- Messages
- 10,752
CurtC:
My point, as stated previously, was that a GM version of a basic foodstuff, specifically not approved for our consumption, nevertheless made its way into many food products.
No, I didn't disagree. I simply asked if it had been approved for human consumption.DanishDynamite, Richard R said that everything he saw by Googling indicated that Starlink is not harmful for humans and you disagreed.
No, I have no such data.Yet even reading the link you just provided, it looks like Starlink is probably not allergenic, based on the tests that Aventis did. Do you have data indicating otherwise?
My point, as stated previously, was that a GM version of a basic foodstuff, specifically not approved for our consumption, nevertheless made its way into many food products.
Perhaps it is. I'm just wary as food is such a fundamental neccesity.And we're not saying that you shouldn't question the safety of what you eat, but that the safety of GM is at least as good as crops modified by more old-fashioned means.