cow_cat
Mr. Parodied
Greetings all.
In an effort to break up the monotony of this subforum, I, a long-time lurker have decided to post something a little different.*
The Diana Conspiracies have been briefly discussed here before, but today was Mohammed Al-Fayed's (Harrods owner and father of Dodi, who also perished in the crash) day in court.
h t t p : / / news. bbc. co. uk /1/hi/uk/7250002.stm
For those who are new to this, he has long maintained that Diana and Dodi were murdered by a 'Secret Cabal' answering to The Duke Of Edinburgh (Queen Elizabeth's husband) because of the messy divorce of Diana and Prince Charles. Today he mouthed off behind the protection of the witness box, espousing all of his theories to be taken into consideration by the jury.
Interestingly, there seems to be no place that holds a good debunking of this CT. There are some sites with a broad-brush debunking, but nothing with any structure or depth. As an example,
h t t p : / / w w w . time. com /time/world/article/0,8599,1569818,00.html
And now back to your regular 9/11 nuttiness.
*I may also wade in on the 9/11 stuff, I hear there's a vacancy in the NWO shill Dept for a fresh faced, naive, wet-behind-the-ears debunker
In an effort to break up the monotony of this subforum, I, a long-time lurker have decided to post something a little different.*
The Diana Conspiracies have been briefly discussed here before, but today was Mohammed Al-Fayed's (Harrods owner and father of Dodi, who also perished in the crash) day in court.
h t t p : / / news. bbc. co. uk /1/hi/uk/7250002.stm
For those who are new to this, he has long maintained that Diana and Dodi were murdered by a 'Secret Cabal' answering to The Duke Of Edinburgh (Queen Elizabeth's husband) because of the messy divorce of Diana and Prince Charles. Today he mouthed off behind the protection of the witness box, espousing all of his theories to be taken into consideration by the jury.
Interestingly, there seems to be no place that holds a good debunking of this CT. There are some sites with a broad-brush debunking, but nothing with any structure or depth. As an example,
h t t p : / / w w w . time. com /time/world/article/0,8599,1569818,00.html
And now back to your regular 9/11 nuttiness.
*I may also wade in on the 9/11 stuff, I hear there's a vacancy in the NWO shill Dept for a fresh faced, naive, wet-behind-the-ears debunker