[Moderated]Did Chief Nigro call Silverstein? The answer is finally available

[DGM]

For future reference, please don't expect a response to leading, non sensical questions, based mostly on speculation.

I have a specific question for you, has Silverstein ever stated which "er" fire commander to whom he is referring?

No he hasn't. My point is being the type of person I believe him to be (from experience) I would not put it past him to make himself look more important when asked in an interview. This is why I asked you what I did. SILVERSTEIN IS A CONTROL FREAK like every major developer I've known.

To think he would order the destruction of a building that would lose him money is insane. Do you agree that he lost money on 9/11? He would know this in advance and any plan he would reject immediately.

 

[ref]

Does this mean that Aquaman will change the cards from his old presentation and offer an apology to Silverstein for saying he made the decision. Will Alex "fat boy" Jones pull the webpage accusing Silverstein and apologize?

I don't think those people ever apologize. Nor admit they were wrong.

 

[~enigma~]

I don't think those people ever apologize. Nor admit they were wrong.

More proof that they are sub human scum.

 

[Blender Head]

So, this nullfies the point I made in my 'Nigro Please', video. How should I correct my error?

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

I could have been clearer with my pronoun reference, or lack thereof, so allow me to restate, so that you can actually address my point instead of focusing on semantics:

When in doubt, just bring out the ol' righteous indignation. Foucs on the details.

Way to go... Confusing your pronouns in such a way that a reader comes off thinking that your claim is that Silverstein himself made the decision to "pull" WTC7 is pointless semantics, but you want people to focus on the details.

Seriously. Wtf?

 

[ref]

So, this nullfies the point I made in my 'Nigro Please', video. How should I correct my error?

I think nothing else is needed, than removing the claim that Nigro called Silverstein. Not a big deal.

 

[RedIbis]

Way to go... Confusing your pronouns in such a way that a reader comes off thinking that your claim is that Silverstein himself made the decision to "pull" WTC7 is pointless semantics, but you want people to focus on the details.

Yeah, especially you. Do you have something specific to discuss?

 

[Blender Head]

I think nothing else is needed, than removing the claim that Nigro called Silverstein. Not a big deal.

Understood; I was unsure what this revelation means in regards to 'pull it' and how I should clarify it.

 

[boloboffin]

I sent you a message at YouTube, but I'll repeat it here. Regardless of who talked to Silverstein, Nigro would have approved any such undertaking by the Fire Department. His statement to the contrary could not be clearer.

 

[ref]

I sent you a message at YouTube, but I'll repeat it here. Regardless of who talked to Silverstein, Nigro would have approved any such undertaking by the Fire Department. His statement to the contrary could not be clearer.

And regardless of who talked to Silvestein, Nigro made the decision to evacuate aka "pull" everybody from the vicinity of WTC 7. So the Silverstein statement "they made the decision" stands as strong as is always has.

 

[Blender Head]

The answer is: No.

I asked Chief Nigro about this, and he was kind to respond very quickly. What he said was basically this:



He also once reminded again, that as we all know, he would not have needed the approval of Silverstein to make the evacuation order. So, whoever Silverstein is talking about getting the call from, it is NOT Chief Nigro.

An interesting twist to the story. Wonder what the truthers are going to make of this

I take it that what you're quoting is merely a paraphrase, correct?

 

[CHF]

I love how so many of Red's replies seem to start with..."Maybe he..."

 

[BenBurch]

Wow, its fun to watch Red Ibis squirm. The bottom line; Silverstein had nothing to cover up. NO doubt he talked to somebody, likely somebody from City Hall, and whomever that was never passed on the message. (Communications was in near failure that day.)

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Yeah, especially you. Do you have something specific to discuss?

Nope. Just an observation. No need to be so easily distracted by it, RedIbis.

 

[ref]

I take it that what you're quoting is merely a paraphrase, correct?

Sorry, I'm not a native english speaker, so I don't know what paraphrase means. What I have in that quote are Chief Nigro's actual words. I didn't post the entire message he sent, but everything in that quote is his words word by word.

 

[Blender Head]

Sorry, I'm not a native english speaker, so I don't know what paraphrase means. What I have in that quote are Chief Nigro's actual words. I didn't post the entire message he sent, but everything in that quote is his words word by word.

Paraphrase is a summary of one's words, which is what you did not do. Thanks for answering my questions.

 

[RedIbis]

And regardless of who talked to Silvestein, Nigro made the decision to evacuate aka "pull" everybody from the vicinity of WTC 7. So the Silverstein statement "they made the decision" stands as strong as is always has.

What time was that?

 

[ref]

What time was that?

What time was what? The decision to evacuate was made approx. 3 hours before the collapse.

 

[RedIbis]

What time was what? The decision to evacuate was made approx. 3 hours before the collapse.

Doesn't Larry kind of make it seem like the decision was made and then they watched the building collapse? If so, what are they pulling if no crew was in the bldg?

And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.

Even if it is the crew, does pulling a firefighting crew initiate collapse? That doesn't make sense.

 

[ref]

Doesn't Larry kind of make it seem like the decision was made and then they watched the building collapse? If so, what are they pulling if no crew was in the bldg?



Even if it is the crew, does pulling a firefighting crew initiate collapse? That doesn't make sense.

There were search and rescue operations well inside the evacuated collapse zone. It's is not a literal turn of events: evacuation (pulling) -> collapse. The building collapsed after the decision was made. There was a time differential of 3 hours.