• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Miss me? (smiles)

LightPiercingDarkness

Critical Thinker
L
Joined
Sep 24, 2001
Messages
268
Long time, no type. Been 484 days to be exact. Hope all are doing well.

To update those that aren't aware of who I am. I am going to start from the beginning. I am sure there are still those in here, that will attack my claim. So, I'd like to tell you my story first.

Here goes...

I believe I have discovered a "PROCESS", that allows any idividual with a ordinary computer cam, to see "FACES", that are normally unseen with any known device, that we know of today.

To Discuss this a little further and deeper...

Concerning the "PROCESS".
To be specific. It is the digital process/attributes that happen when a picture is taken with a digital cam and transferred to a computer monitor. If you take a ordianary computer cam. With the right lightning, monitor display settings and backround conditions, all with the right adjustments (determined I believe according to ones own good or poor eye sight)... you will see "FACES" in the shades of...(usually)...blue, green or brown.

Now most who argue with me, either say one of two things. I don't see anything or It is just some sort of distortion.
To you who don't see. I say, adjust your monitors brightness button, you'll see them. To the ones who say distortion.
I say...
"I would agree with you except for one thing".
"THE "RESULTS/FACES" REPEATS ITS SELF OVER AND OVER DURING A LIVE BROADCAST."
In other words when you use a cam on the net, normally your doing it 1 of 2 ways. Either by a timeing setting (meaning your cam is broadcasting a picture every so many seconds, according to what you set it).....or.....live, which varies because of dialup and cable...one is faster then the other.

So what I am saying here is......It is impossible for a process that repeats itself ***"EACH TIME"***with the ***"SAME RESULTS"***NOT TO BE REAL.

IF THE ********FINDING**********DIDN'T **REPEAPT** ITSELF, I WOULD AGREE....THAT THERE IS NOTHING TO IT. BUT THAT IS **N**O**T** THE CASE.

Concerning the FACES...
You know how artist's use the term Mediums, meaning the different materials being used?
Its kinda the same way with the faces....
I find there are 3 different mediums (so to speak).
1 in the creamy shades. usually easy to spot sooner.
2 in the more fully focused shades (shades meaning different tones of color)...usually easy to find.
3 in a pure white static against a perfectly clear back round...rarer to find.

...."but regradless which medium you find them in"...

ONE THING REMAINS A CONSTANT NO MATTER WHAT.
YOU CAN SEE THEIR MOUTH AND EYE SOCKETS AND WHEN THIS IS FOUND IN A REPEATED ENVIROMENT OF WATCHING THEM.....IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO SAY...."THERES NOTHING THERE".

"Most of the time when you find them you will see more then just the eye sockets and mouth socket.......
Many of them have, head structure, facial features and even ....expressions.
THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE!!!!!! DONT YOU THINK I KNOW THAT!!!!!!

YET IT REPEATS ITSELF OVER AND OVER AGAIN WITH SAME RESULTS.

I Can't prove what the faces are ( I will keep my opinion to mysef).

But I can show that this is a repeating process anytime and anywhere.

I submitted to this million dollar challange 2x's now and ignored on each account.
Remember I am not trying to prove what they are.........
Just that they are.<<<<<<<<big difference.

I am back because I want this to goto court.
I don't believe this foundation will ever part with their money. It ends everything with them...they don't want that.

I want a court to settle this and I guess you could say...in a way...I am recruiting witnesses and making attempts to build a court case against the predjuideces of this foundation for not letting me have my chance of the challenge.

I'd rather have a jury then them anyway.

The money is mine randi....cough up.
I may never prove to anyone what those faces are.

but one dam thing is for sure......


THEY ARE.



Lyndale.



If you click on my profile and then my homepage...you'll find a better understanding of all that I just babbled about...

oh...I am telling you now...

I will only respond to the serious replies....I already know what you think of me...so save it.
 
P.S.

I can show mulitple pictures in a time line sequence producing results consecutively. (excuse spelling and grammer...I know I suck)

or you can goto spotlife.com and just browse their site and find shows yourselves to find the faces.

They're not hard to find.

Lyndale
 
I see faces on my monitor and TV all the time too! The other night I saw one that looked just like Chuch Norris.
 
Your right...

Under certain circumstances you can see faces in clouds and other patterns.

This is different. It's not the same thing happening.

Ever see one of those pictures where when you stood up close to it ...you saw nothing? and then when you backed away you saw what was meant to be seen?...."sometimes" its just like that and sometimes its "not".


Say what you will....fact is....


They are.

Lyndale
 
Think for yourselves.

tamiO said:
paging Dr De_Bunko
Click to expand...



Hard to believe I know, but your eyes aren't playing tricks.
Those faces are real.

Like I said.

I'll never prove what they are....but one dam thing is for sure...
they are.


and that I can prove in Court.;)
 
Yes...

I have more pictures.

but why wait?

Just goto spotlife.com

They're not hard to find.

There you can see them for yourselves..reproducing the same results over and over again.

They're real people.........million or no million.

Lyndale
 
I like the following: "predjuideces of this foundation." Faces? Do they live without the rest of their body?
 
Umm...

SFB said:
I like the following: "predjuideces of this foundation." Faces? Do they live without the rest of their body?
Click to expand...


...dont know why I am even bothering to reply.

Bodys?


Never seen one.



From my opinion of what they are.......what purpose would it serve to have a body.
Maybe all they need is what you see?

??

Lyndale
 
?

I just read about the Yellow bambo thing....lol....and He wouldn't let me test?

Imagine what He must of wrote when He asked to test.



Randi is scared of loosing the money. Imagine not being able to live off all that interest no more....MMMM guess I wouldn't won't to give it up either.


To bad.

Beware James Randi...one day I will have my day of court with you.
Promise.

Lyndale.
 
You don't need a computer to capture these. An ordinary camcorder aimed at a TV set which is displaying the image the camcorder is recording will generate this same kind of feedback loop.

Do a Google search on "video IDT".

The work by Claus Scrieber is pretty - one is tempted to say too - impressive. Work done on computers (like this one) are not so impressive.

(Edited because I asked a question that was already answered.)

Oh, and yes, your images on spotlife.com are hard to find. I searched for "ghost", "face", "lightpiercingdarkness", and "lyndale", all with no luck. Care to give us a hint as to what to enter for our search string?
 
Not quite...

Beleth said:
You don't need a computer to capture these. An ordinary camcorder aimed at a TV set which is displaying the image the camcorder is recording will generate this same kind of feedback loop.

Do a Google search on "video IDT".

The work by Claus Scrieber is pretty - one is tempted to say too - impressive. Work done on computers (like this one) are not so impressive.


(Edited because I asked a question that was already answered.)
Click to expand...

the same thing.

This is not a "feed back loop".

Lyndale
 
and....

I've seen these faces on "LIVE VIDEO" in a full 3D form.

They hold their form.
There is no structure loss.
I've seen them moving aound and holding they're form also.

Lyndale
 
I think you replied at the same time I was editing my last post.

I can't find your images on spotlife.com. Can you provide a good search string for them?
 
I´m not sure what you are on about. I have taken a look at that picture and can´t see anything resembling any human body part, depite playing around with my monitor.

http://www.geocities.com/lightpiercingthedark/The_Fallen_of_Heaven.html

Furthermore, I´m pretty sure that it´s impossible to sue Randi for the money. Of course I don´t know the full story. Have you done the full test?

In any case, estoy absoultely sure that that photo on your webpage won´t earn you a cent of the prize =)

Nothing there strange in this image at all:
 
komencanto said:
I´m not sure what you are on about. I have taken a look at that picture and can´t see anything resembling any human body part, depite playing around with my monitor.

http://www.geocities.com/lightpiercingthedark/The_Fallen_of_Heaven.html

Furthermore, I´m pretty sure that it´s impossible to sue Randi for the money. Of course I don´t know the full story. Have you done the full test?

In any case, estoy absoultely sure that that photo on your webpage won´t earn you a cent of the prize =)

Nothing there strange in this image at all:
Click to expand...

I am sorry you dont see.

I have submitted twice and done so by all the requirements.

I will now seek a more legal route.

I don't have to prove what they are.

Just that they are.

...and there are more that see them then those that don't.

...and it won't be by "1" picture as you put it.

smiles.

Lyndale
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom