Miracle of the Shroud IV - The Phantom Image

Status
Not open for further replies.
- Whatever, it appears that something was done to the sample that did not obviously affect the continued banding

Or, nothing was done to the sample, right? Do you agree that this would also explain the observation?

- A suggestion offered by John Klotz, author of The Coming of the Quantum Christ: If the goal of those that repaired the corner was an invisible repair that they would per force have replicated the banding where necessary.

False. Even if the goal was to make an invisible repair, there is no reason to assume that they could have achieved that goal. Even today, we know of no method to make an invisible repair, so why would you assume that 13th century artisans were able to do it? (And why would they even try?)

The obvious conclusion is that since no repair is detectable at the sampling site, none exists.

Hans
 
I'm kind of at a loss as to why Jabba thinks things are progressing when he only makes one or two posts a day and most of those are to tell us he needs to look things up.
 
If the patch is invisible and undetectable, then the C14 testing on it should return the same date as the rest of the shroud.
Because such a repair would have to be done with original material? We discussed that once or twice.
 
So I guess he hasn't found a champion from Shroudstory.com to ride to his assistance.

I was trying to think of a Hall of Shame list of Jabba's worst arguments that any potential Sir Lancelot would find interesting before commiting.

ETA:

- That any re-weave/patch would be undetectable if made from other threads of the same cloth, but would yield a falsely more-recent date.

- That the Sudarium of Oviedo authenticates the Shroud, even though it's not old enough to be authentic either.

- That all 14C scientists are incompetent or liars, while all the STURP team except Walter McCrone were virtuous pursuers of scientific facts.

- That the Roman Catholic church conspired to make the Shroud look inauthentic by providing known 'bad' samples to the 14C scientists.

- That banding only visible under x-ray fluorescence or UV light could be replicated in patches/reweaves made in the middle ages.

- Not to worry, I'll be back.
 
Last edited:
So I guess he hasn't found a champion from Shroudstory.com to ride to his assistance.

I was trying to think of a Hall of Shame list of Jabba's worst arguments that any potential Sir Lancelot would find interesting before commiting.

ETA:

- That any re-weave/patch would be undetectable if made from other threads of the same cloth, but would yield a falsely more-recent date.

- That the Sudarium of Oviedo authenticates the Shroud, even though it's not old enough to be authentic either.

- That all 14C scientists are incompetent or liars, while all the STURP team except Walter McCrone were virtuous pursuers of scientific facts.

- That the Roman Catholic church conspired to make the Shroud look inauthentic by providing known 'bad' samples to the 14C scientists.

- That banding only visible under x-ray fluorescence or UV light could be replicated in patches/reweaves made in the middle ages.

- Not to worry, I'll be back.


- Ray Rogers using fibers from broken chain-of-custody provenance to perform an unproven age test in his kitchen is preferable to three independent labs performing a well-proven and highly documented test because the Archbishop (?) of Turin wasn't videotaped sealing the sample bags.
 
Chickens are dinosaurs.


A chicken is a fast cabbage.:)

Thank you for your responses, as shallow as they are.

Before I go to to topic 1.1.2, a pause and a confirmation is necessary to limit the extent of tervigisitatuionamabob.

Is it agreed that chickens as a concept exist in the minds of humans?
 
Can you weave a patch of invisible chickens?

I'm confused about the topic now.

Carefully, to the sound of one hand clapping as a tree falls in a forest with nobody around.

If the right colored raffia is used, all is potato.

Now that we all agree with 1.1.2, we can at last make progress.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom