linusrichard
Master Poster
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2007
- Messages
- 2,710
My understanding is that Kucinich believes in "Chemtrails" and UFOs.
Okay, well I may have to backpedal a bit then. I'd still vote for the little doozer though.
My understanding is that Kucinich believes in "Chemtrails" and UFOs.
Bachmann's latest on an "interesting coincidence":
Quiz question: Who was president during the last swine flu scare?
I stick with moron.
]I find it an "interesting coincidence" that
]My understanding is that Kucinich believes in "Chemtrails" and UFOs.
Okay, well I may have to backpedal a bit then. I'd still vote for the little doozer though.
On the other hand, yummy.
One thing Kucinich has going over Bachman is that while he is a nut, he's a principled nut. IMHO, he not only believes what he stands for, but he and his wife, as seen in the above link, actually do something about it.
Elizabeth Kucinich was at St. Louis's Pride Parade last year. Kudos to her.
That should read: "he not only genuinely believes what he says he stands for, ...".he not only believes what he stands for, ...
I can see that getting some traction with the appropriate spin: Coolidge PREVENTED the crisis with Sound Conservative Values, which is why the economy didn't actually suffer as much. Modern liberal historians in socialist universities have covered it up, but here's the truth from a real American: (insert link to wingnut screed).Smoot-Hawley was signed into law by Hoover, not FDR and the idea that Coolidge faced a more severe economic crisis than FDR did is silly.
On the other hand, yummy.
One thing Kucinich has going over Bachman is that while he is a nut, he's a principled nut.
You agree with his politics (and he has a cute hippie wife) so you'll forgive his being a nut? You will not see me saying that about Bachmann, because I know that nuts on my side accomplish nothing other than discrediting my causes by association.
No no no no noYou agree with his politics (and he has a cute hippie wife) so you'll forgive his being a nut?
My guess is that Bachman is also sincere - she seems to be creating her own false data, rather than just repeating old canards, which is the sign of a true loon rather than a panderer.Some of his politics I agree with, many I do not. I also do not forgive his being a nut. I do think he is that rare politician who says what he means, even if I don't agree with what he says.
No no no no no
Some of his politics I agree with, many I do not. I also do not forgive his being a nut. I do think he is that rare politician who says what he means, even if I don't agree with what he says.
Really? I think she says the things she does because she is trying to get one over on the other guy rather than out of principle. I guess I should look more into her positions to see if there is a consistency that I'm not seeing. I could be wrong.I think Bachmann also says what she means.
I do think that Bachmann is being sincere, i.e., her elevator goes all the way to the top. It just misses a few floors along the way.
And maybe she wouldn't be so angry all the time.Yeah, but you gotta admit, if Bachman had a cute hippie wife, you'd definitely be a little more forgiving.
Wouldn't it be great if the flamethrowers from both sides would tone it down, and the complete Bachmans would lose their powers of speech? What would happen then?
I could ride around on the rainbow coming out of my ass...