aerocontrols
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2001
- Messages
- 3,444
Jocko said:Looks like Demon got suckered again.
Moore: "Just Kidding"
I can hear him now: But... but I read it on the internet!
Can't you recognize dissent when it's be silenced?
Jocko said:Looks like Demon got suckered again.
Moore: "Just Kidding"
I can hear him now: But... but I read it on the internet!
rockoon said:The BBC reports other people telling half-truths. Moore goes out and manufactures them himself.
Get it?
sorgoth said:Ugh...I used to be a big supporter of Moore, until I figured out how liberally he edits his films...cuts and pastes speech... But I can't say my entire support is gone. Bush's lies kill people, Moore's(hopefully) discredit Bush...
gnome said:
Bush doesn't need to be discredited with lies, in fact that would be 100% counterproductive, as it will cause people to mistrust the truth as well.
There are plenty of true things to criticize Bush with, and I hope that Moore will stick to them. I enjoyed Bowling for Columbine but I believe it would have been a stronger film had he spent less time making Charlton Heston look bad, and stuck to his message about American culture.
Not that I am a fan of Mr. Heston or the NRA--I just think attacking him did nothing for what was otherwise a highly intriguing film, and in fact raised too many questions about bias and creative editing.
tamiO said:
There are probably some Republicans that are funny. I exaggerate. Dennis Miller is Republican, isn't he?![]()
gnome said:
Bush doesn't need to be discredited with lies, in fact that would be 100% counterproductive, as it will cause people to mistrust the truth as well.
There are plenty of true things to criticize Bush with, and I hope that Moore will stick to them. I enjoyed Bowling for Columbine but I believe it would have been a stronger film had he spent less time making Charlton Heston look bad, and stuck to his message about American culture.
Not that I am a fan of Mr. Heston or the NRA--I just think attacking him did nothing for what was otherwise a highly intriguing film, and in fact raised too many questions about bias and creative editing.