RedIbis
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2007
- Messages
- 6,899
No Red. This is still a false dichotomy.
There is a possibility, and given that Rove has never been charged, arrested, indicted or convicted of anything I would even call it a probability, that Rove hasn't done anything wrong.
Either Rove did something nasty and killed Connell to cover it up, or he did something and is lucky that Connell has been silenced, or he did nothing wrong and is not lucky that Connell has died because nothing was going to happen to him anyway.
That's three possibilities, one of which you arbitrarily rule out without cause. Hence the false dichotomy.
EDIT: Ok, I just did the same thing myself (false trichotomy?). I ignored the possibility that Rove did nothing wrong but killed Connell anyway. Human beings have never operated under the obligation to only do things that make sense. I'm fairly certain that the truth will be found somewhere between these four possibilites.
I see your point but you left out the possibility that Connell's death is an accident but he was holding a winning lottery ticket which he planned to give to Rove as a gift for all their years of working together, which would make Rove quite unlucky for having not gotten a chance to receive it.
Since my statement was never a formal argument, I'm going to stick with my opinion that Rove just lucked out, or he had something to do with it.