Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony

Cabbage said:
Actually, as has been pointed out repeatedly, your hypocrisy is ubiquitous and quite easily found.
Click to expand...

Quite true indeed!

For example, does anyone else recall how '16.5' once said that Hillary Clinton should be sent to prison for the e-mail issue?

False, I said the scumbag SHOULD be frogmarched to prison, but that she very well will not be.

On the other hand? "Not indicted" is about as low a standard as you can get for an actual Presidential Candidate.
Click to expand...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=11241821#post11241821
 
The Big Dog said:
No way, the Democrat party wants to do a virtually unlimited investigation into a sitting President of the opposite party?

Golly, it really is a witch hunt.

Leave it to the butthurt dems to wipe their ass on the concept of separation of powers.

idiots
Click to expand...

Unlimited investigation is a power reserved to them and cannot be stopped by the other branches. That is separation of powers.
 
The Big Dog said:
No way, the Democrat party wants to do a virtually unlimited investigation into a sitting President of the opposite party?

Golly, it really is a witch hunt.

Leave it to the butthurt dems to wipe their ass on the concept of separation of powers.

idiots
Click to expand...

This from the guy who had no issue with multi-year investigations into Ben Ghazzi and Hillary Clinton deleting emails. Can someone say "hypocrisy"?

Performing oversight is not a witch hunt. It's just that it appears as if the President has broken campaign finance laws, insurance and or tax fraud/evasion, ran a fraudulent charity as well as conspired with a foreign power to defraud the United States.

Requesting documents is SOP. Perhaps the committee will find nothing. :rolleyes:

But the good news is we will finally get to see those tax returns Trump promised to release. I mean I know you believe in transparency.
 
Last edited:
acbytesla said:
This from the guy who had no issue with multi-year investigations into Ben Ghazzi and Hillary Clinton deleting emails. Can someone say "hypocrisy"?

Performing oversight is not a witch hunt. It's just that it appears as if the President has broken campaign finance laws, insurance and or tax fraud/evasion, ran a fraudulent charity as well as conspired with a foreign power to defraud the United States.

Requesting documents is SOP. Perhaps the committee will find nothing. :rolleyes:

But the good news is we will finally get to see those tax returns Trump promised to release. I mean I know you believe in transparency.
Click to expand...

Clinton was not president.
 
The Big Dog said:
I'm not quibbling at all, i expect a certain level of legibility and avoidance of loaded words
Click to expand...

Why? You and I both understand the process. I made it clear that I understand the context of my use of the word unlimited. My use of unlimited going forward doesn't alter our understanding of the conversation.
 
BobTheCoward said:
Clinton was not president.
Click to expand...

and remind your correspondent that tu quoques are utterly terrible arguments. If he was outraged over Benghazi, he ought to be apoplectic over this fishing expedition; he's not of course, take a guess why...
 
BobTheCoward said:
Why? You and I both understand the process. I made it clear that I understand the context of my use of the word unlimited. My use of unlimited going forward doesn't alter our understanding of the conversation.
Click to expand...

it was the segregated from other branches part, given that the Democrat party wants to investigate the President.
 
The Big Dog said:
and remind your correspondent that tu quoques are utterly terrible arguments. If he was outraged over Benghazi, he ought to be apoplectic over this fishing expedition; he's not of course, take a guess why...
Click to expand...

Because he doesn't think it is fishing but investigation into something meeting the minimum requirements of evidence required for that investigation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom