If he wasn't so belligerent with the Paramedics at the jail or the medical staff at the hospital maybe his concussion wouldn't have been left untreated.
I thought that aggressive behaviour was a moderately common symptom of concussion.
If he wasn't so belligerent with the Paramedics at the jail or the medical staff at the hospital maybe his concussion wouldn't have been left untreated.
So did you spot the part about walking in the street and obstructing traffic while doing so?
Or the SOP that if there are no sidewalks it's ok to walk in the street- on the side facing traffic so you can see what is coming at you?
What original document?
Baden explained that the confusion came when the reporters misunderstood the fact the diagram is an anatomical diagram. It's not a reference as to how those limbs were oriented when struck.
It's also not perpendicular. If it were it would stick well into the other lane.
If it's 17 feet long, that street is not much wider than 20 feet. Unless one is hallucinating.![]()
I think it would stick out less if we park it straight across the lane.
We already covered the angle, it's ~18 feet corner to corner.
If I cared anymore, I would put a Franklin on the road being between 25 and 30 feet wide.![]()
So we now know conclusively that Wilson cussed them, without doubt or question, we know it, right? When did this unimpeachable fact come to light, exactly?
I agree it's a teen thing. And I understand people would like on occasion to use expletives when someone is in your way in the street.
But when a police officer uses that tactic, it's going to have one of two reactions. Either an expletive back, or cowering in fear of the cop and getting off the street. Why use it? Why not politely ask and try for a non-confrontational approach? The polite approach would seem like more intelligent policing to me.
A non-established bit of data being trumpeted uncritically as fact: police are not to be trusted, only thieves.
...and I still don't understand why they were walking in the street.
I think it would stick out less if we park it straight across the lane.
We already covered the angle, it's ~18 feet corner to corner.
If I cared anymore, I would put a Franklin on the road being between 25 and 30 feet wide.![]()
So given that observation, why would a cop choose to yell at these two walking on that residential street if the norm is for cops to ignore jaywalkers on busy streets downtown?
Do you know for a fact that Officer Wilson was polite or not in telling the teens to move to the sidewalk?
It's also not perpendicular. If it were it would stick well into the other lane.
If it's 17 feet long, that street is not much wider than 20 feet. Unless one is hallucinating.![]()
FWIW, Google Earth seems to agree. I zoomed in to max with clarity and used the ruler tool (which I have found to be surprisingly accurate when I've checked it against dimensions I knew) to measure half a dozen spots in that stretch of road.
They uniformly came up about twenty eight ft. (a bit over five smoots). FOC to FOC. That would be in line with two twelve ft. lanes and two thirty in. C & G. (twenty four in. to FOC.)
I'm willing to go with that as "close enough" until someone gets out there with a measuring tape.
Now ... what does this tell us?
I still don't understand why they were walking in the street.
Racist.
Ya got me. FWIW, Google Earth seems to agree. I zoomed in to max with clarity and used the ruler tool (which I have found to be surprisingly accurate when I've checked it against dimensions I knew) to measure half a dozen spots in that stretch of road.
They uniformly came up about twenty eight ft. (a bit over five smoots). FOC to FOC. That would be in line with two twelve ft. lanes and two thirty in. C & G. (twenty four in. to FOC.)
I'm willing to go with that as "close enough" until someone gets out there with a measuring tape.
Now ... what does this tell us?
Or a carpenter.
If that SUV is 17 feet long, then that street is 24-25 feet wide. Unless one is hallucinating. Or ill-equipped to comment on the subject.![]()
Funeral is not even over and already MSNBC and Fox News are exchanging potshots over their respective coverage of it.
The feud between them is amusing. For one to accuse the other of being heavily slanted and biases,is must about the worse case of "Mr Pot,Meet Miss Kettle" I have seen.
MSNBC derided the way Fox News conducts their business for years, and I agreed... then they became so similar it was disturbing. Haven't watched MSNBC in years.