johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 18,528
That should be obvious to an attorney like yourself.
When did I claim to be an attorney?
That should be obvious to an attorney like yourself.
I was merely pointing out that Brown was, in fact, a thug. I said nothing regarding the officer or the officer's knowledge.
I glad for the both of you that you're content to live in a society in which cops can just kill people, and as long as they tell us they had to, we just go ahead and believe them.
Personally, I find such a notion rather chilling, and wish to see a scrutiny applied to these situations that assures the citizenry their police force is acting with the responsibility their roles merit.
Your repeated claims to not be able to read minds don't seem to preclude you from making attempts to.I glad for the both of you that you're content to live in a society in which cops can just kill people, and as long as they tell us they had to, we just go ahead and believe them.
Personally, I find such a notion rather chilling, and wish to see a scrutiny applied to these situations that assures the citizenry their police force is acting with the responsibility their roles merit.
I know what it means. I also know it is used as a dog whistle term for those wishing to not use other words considered socially unacceptable. If I am unsure of the user's intent, and therefore wish to distance myself from the term by use of quotation marks, that is my prerogative. If that somehow offends or troubles you, it's not something I am concerned with beyond the end of this sentence.
If a cop is standing over the dead body of a 48 year old black woman who works as a high powered corporate lawyer, who is laying there dead next to her Lexus, unarmed, and still wearing her expensive suit... I'm going to have my eyebrow raised up pretty high with regard to his claim that he had to kill her. Especially if I go on to find out that she had no criminal record whatsoever, and was just out by her car at her normal time of going home for the day...
If, however, a police officer tells me he had to kill an enormous white male thug who'd just committed a violent felony an hour earlier... I'm going to start off fairly inclined to believe him, especially if the cop has injuries.
I'm with Skeptic Tank on this. I don't see how someone can watch that video of Brown robbing the store, knocking the clerk out of his way and then turning around to intimidate the clerk back into the store and not think Brown was a thug.
Your repeated claims to not be able to read minds don't seem to preclude you from making attempts to.
You are correct, though. I can tell from this post that you really are unable to.
I glad for the both of you that you're content to live in a society in which cops can just kill people, and as long as they tell us they had to, we just go ahead and believe them.
Here's an odd detail regarding the alleged robbery.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/15/ferguson-police-michael-brown-robbery-suspect
So there was never an official police complaint by the store? Wasn't the whole idea that Wilson was responding to a reported robbery, but how would that call have gone out if there was no official complaint from the store owners that included a description?
.
I'm with Skeptic Tank on this. I don't see how someone can watch that video of Brown robbing the store, knocking the clerk out of his way and then turning around to intimidate the clerk back into the store and not think Brown was a thug.
[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/ZRLVOv3.gif[/qimg]
I have read many claims in this thread regarding how many times Mr. Brown was shot, and where.For the sake of hilarity, let's assume he was. Does being a thug mean it is permissible for a police officer to shoot a man who has surrendered? Witness accounts say he was shot twice, turned away, put his hands in the air, and received an additional five rounds in the back while he was facing away.
Maybe he did knock around a shopkeeper. Maybe he did rough up the cop. Maybe he even did really make a grab for the gun. But at the point he'd been shot twice and had surrendered, all further shooting should have ceased. Five rounds into the back isn't an honest mistake. Five rounds in the back isn't an attempt to disable someone. Particularly when they've been hit twice already, were facing away, and had hands in the air. Five rounds in the back is an execution.
Of course, this is all provided the witness accounts were completely accurate. Reality may vary. We will see.
I have read many claims in this thread regarding how many times Mr. Brown was shot, and where.
Is there anyplace you know of where the the accurate information is available?
More questions without making any statements other than personal attacks Johnny?I apologize if I have misconstrued your position.
Please, tell me which part of the bolded portion I got wrong:
How would it be possible for Brown to get at Wilson's weapon, assuming the conflict starts with Wilson still in the police vehicle?
Speak for yourself.
More questions without making any statements other than personal attacks Johnny?
Okay, I'll play anyway.
Sometimes is it okay for LEO's to kill people?
If investigations into these deaths find that it was necessary, or accidental ( not negligent) it's okay.
If it turns out that it was not necessary, or was negligent, the LEO' s should be reprimanded or punished based upon a reasonable examination of the circumstances.
I believe them unless evidence to the contrary comes out, and recognize that no set of rules, however comprehensive or well thought out, will be able to cover every circumstance or emotional element to arise.
If you think you can construct a robo-cop that will do better, have at it.