Rob Lister
Unregistered
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
- Messages
- 8,504
But that cuts both ways. The kind of tourist who will go to Mexico for drugs isn't the kind of tourist who goes there to stay in luxury hotels and fling money around.
Evidence?
But that cuts both ways. The kind of tourist who will go to Mexico for drugs isn't the kind of tourist who goes there to stay in luxury hotels and fling money around.
Evidence?
I don't have a study in front of me demonstrating that drug addicts tend not to be wealthy tourists, or that non-drug-addict tourists would mind rubbing elbows with drug addict tourists. So it's just a baseless assertion.
I didn't make a baseless assertion so far as I know.
You did, however. I asked for evidence. You once again admitted that you have none.
I personallly think, but do not know, that tourism dollars will greatly increase as a result of this new [un]law.
All the talk about drug tourism is jumping the gun a bit. Is there any evidence the motivation for relaxing the drug laws is increased tourism?
I'm a mere monkey, but isn't there a hell of a difference between pot and heroin? And ecstasy?! Great Walrus Pancakes! Ecstasy is damn bad stuff! Even making it is horribly dangerous.
eta: Damn! Beaten to it. His article's more detailed.
I don't have a study in front of me demonstrating that drug addicts tend not to be wealthy tourists, or that non-drug-addict tourists would mind rubbing elbows with drug addict tourists. So it's just a baseless assertion.
Have you had any personal experience with X?