• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Metatheory and the NIST report

What a ridiculous load of tosh. I must say your moral certitude is not very convincing really.

Well, yes you would say that, wouldn't you? You certainly can't acknowledge radical Islam as a threat and still hold on to your world view, right?
 
So which parts do you disagree with then?

I think my response to you made it clear...

Who has the more noble cause? The person striving to share his fears for the way of life he holds dear, whilst risking ridicule and worse, against the hatred of a group of people intent on shouting down every plea for consideration he makes, OR the "Fanatical Forum Freedom Fighters" waging a war on ignorance, in defence of 'the dead' and their highly honorable members of govt. (who somehow are unable to defend their selves against a rag-tag army of morons, and traitors out to make a quick buck.) When the govt. you trust implicitly has marched the whole world on to the plains of Armageddon, will you offer your apologies then? And don't ask me, "Where are my facts", or I will scream.(Get ready to cover your ears!;) )

Your descriptions of both sides are your own, full of your bias, and from my perspective completely inaccurate. I am not going to make a choice between your definitions...

TAM:)

TAM:)
 
CJOKUSAP your post that implies we trust the government implicitly pretty much destroys any credibility you have in my mind.

What's next, accusing everybody who disagrees with you of being a paid government agent? Is there a term for a huge, especially ridiculous straw man? Perhaps strawgiant? Strawamundo? Strawasaurusrex?
 
CJOKUSAP your post that implies we trust the government implicitly pretty much destroys any credibility you have in my mind.

What's next, accusing everybody who disagrees with you of being a paid government agent?

That would be the next step in the truther "how to argue at JREF" manual.

TAM;)
 
Yes, well you would!

What a ridiculous load of tosh. I must say your moral certitude is not very convincing really.


No, you are forced to brand it as ridiculous because you are incapable of refuting it. Everything I said is true. Your imaginary conspiracy may rampage around aimlessly, strewing clues all over the landscape for low-IQ types, but the jihadists are both real and purposeful. In your zeal to promote agenda-driven rubbish, you are compelled to ignore reality. Reality, however, won't ignore you.
 
Yes, well you would!

What a ridiculous load of tosh. I must say your moral certitude is not very convincing really.


A second response: Is it not true that you and your fellow fantasists promote the myth that the jihadists may be excluded from any discussion of the causes of strife in the Middle East and elsewhere? Is it not true that your imaginary, mathematically-impossible conspiracy commits its pointless atrocities in a world devoid of radical Islamists? Tell us why you pay no attention to what the jihadists themselves actually say. Is it your view that al Jazeera, for example, does not reflect a genuine body of opinion? Was Sayyid Qutb a real person who profoundly influenced Osama bin Laden?

I must say your abysmal ignorance of the world is not very convincing. Really.
 
No, you are forced to brand it as ridiculous because you are incapable of refuting it. Everything I said is true. Your imaginary conspiracy may rampage around aimlessly, strewing clues all over the landscape for low-IQ types, but the jihadists are both real and purposeful. In your zeal to promote agenda-driven rubbish, you are compelled to ignore reality. Reality, however, won't ignore you.
No, I am far from 'forced' to brand it as ridiculous.It just IS. I am fully aware of the threat of militants from all walks of life, but I am just as concerned about rogue elements amongst our own military and security personnel. Your complete refusal to accept it as even "possible", never mind "plausible" exposes you for the gullible sap that you are!
 
CJOKUSAP your post that implies we trust the government implicitly pretty much destroys any credibility you have in my mind.
Do you want to explain how that works? Do you not have any doubts whatsoever? Oh, I forgot. You can't, you're an "Official Truther" and have full access to ALL the facts. Am I right?;)
 
sure

No, I am far from 'forced' to brand it as ridiculous.It just IS. I am fully aware of the threat of militants from all walks of life, but I am just as concerned about rogue elements amongst our own military and security personnel. Your complete refusal to accept it as even "possible", never mind "plausible" exposes you for the gullible sap that you are!
Please list the rogue elements you have found. I found you have ridiculous ideas about everything 9/11 and no facts to back up your shallow researched talk.
 
Last edited:
A second response: Is it not true that you and your fellow fantasists promote the myth that the jihadists may be excluded from any discussion of the causes of strife in the Middle East and elsewhere? Is it not true that your imaginary, mathematically-impossible conspiracy commits its pointless atrocities in a world devoid of radical Islamists? Tell us why you pay no attention to what the jihadists themselves actually say. Is it your view that al Jazeera, for example, does not reflect a genuine body of opinion? Was Sayyid Qutb a real person who profoundly influenced Osama bin Laden?

I must say your abysmal ignorance of the world is not very convincing. Really.
WTF are you on about?
 
No, I am far from 'forced' to brand it as ridiculous.It just IS.



No, this is not a minor semantic point. You are forced to promote your particular brand of pernicious nonsense. Your mind is shackled to your fantasies, your baseless beliefs are unfalsifiable, and you are incapable of evaluating the evidence objectively.

The reason you are helpless to respond coherently to my charges against the evil movement you serve is that there is nothing you can say that hasn't been discredited ad nauseam.



I am fully aware of the threat of militants from all walks of life, but I am just as concerned about rogue elements amongst our own military and security personnel. Your complete refusal to accept it as even "possible", never mind "plausible" exposes you for the gullible sap that you are!


On the contrary, you display no awareness whatever of the threat posed by radical Islam to the West. You choose to remain ignorant of who the jihadists are and what they say.

Your prattle about "rogue elements amongst our own military and security personnel" is a puerile fantasy. Those elements exist solely in imaginations unencumbered by knowledge. You have absolutely nothing to support your delusions.

My refusal to entertain illogical nonsense in the face of overwhelming evidence that contradicts it shows clearly which one of us is the gullible sap. The great difference between the rationalists here and agenda-driven cranks like yourself is that any of our beliefs could be changed by concrete evidence. Yours, by contrast, are chiseled in granite, impervious to evidence and reason.
 
No, this is not a minor semantic point. You are forced to promote your particular brand of pernicious nonsense. Your mind is shackled to your fantasies, your baseless beliefs are unfalsifiable, and you are incapable of evaluating the evidence objectively.


The reason you are helpless to respond coherently to my charges against the evil movement you serve is that there is nothing you can say that hasn't been discredited ad nauseam.

On the contrary, you display no awareness whatever of the threat posed by radical Islam to the West. You choose to remain ignorant of who the jihadists are and what they say.

Your prattle about "rogue elements amongst our own military and security personnel" is a puerile fantasy. Those elements exist solely in imaginations unencumbered by knowledge. You have absolutely nothing to support your delusions.

My refusal to entertain illogical nonsense in the face of overwhelming evidence that contradicts it shows clearly which one of us is the gullible sap. The great difference between the rationalists here and agenda-driven cranks like yourself is that any of our beliefs could be changed by concrete evidence. Yours, by contrast, are chiseled in granite, impervious to evidence and reason.

TALK ABOUT UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS!:clap:
 
Paul don't you ever get tired of this? isn't there a lonley hearts club in Manchester? :socks:
I'd have thought you'd be tired of it by now though, after 1500 posts. I guess a Truth And The American Way Freedom Fighter's work is never done , eh? Where's Superman when you need him?
 
I'd have thought you'd be tired of it by now though, after 1500 posts. I guess a Truth And The American Way Freedom Fighter's work is never done , eh? Where's Superman when you need him?
Now that's funny! I don't think I have ever seen, anyone, reply to the same post TWICE, in a row! Spectacular tell, you have there... D'oh!

DT!
 
Paul don't you ever get tired of this? isn't there a lonley hearts club in Manchester?

:socks:


Are you sure that p-dope knows the word "unsubstantiated"? I could be wrong, but this guy doesn't sound like the truly singular dunce who manages to get himself booted off loon sites.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom