• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Merged] Immortality & Bayesian Statistics

Status
Not open for further replies.
StankApe said:
I will give it a shot:

I'z= B

You'z= A

Them'z=C

We'z=O

Us'z = N

Bacon is delicious hence people are immortal
Click to expand...

No, no, no, no, no.

A for horses.
B for mutton.
C for yourself.
D for dumb.
E for brick.
F for vescent.
G for police.
H for consent.
I for 1.
J for oranges.
K for resteraunt.
L for leather.
M for sis.
N for lope.
O for the wings of a dove.
P for relief.
Q for the loos.
R for mo.
S for you, bog off.
T for 2.
U for mism.
V for Espania.
W for a quid.
X for breakfast.
Y for mistress.
Z for wind.

I'm not sure of the formula, or the answer, but that's the definition of the terms.
 
Jabba said:
- I think that I can essentially prove immortality using Bayesian statistics.
- If this belongs in a different thread, or has already been done, please let me know. Otherwise, I'll present my case here.
--- Jabba
Click to expand...

Okay,so do it.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
No, no, no, no, no.

A for horses.
B for mutton.
C for yourself.
D for dumb.
E for brick.
F for vescent.
G for police.
H for consent.
I for 1.
J for oranges.
K for resteraunt.
L for leather.
M for sis.
N for lope.
O for the wings of a dove.
P for relief.
Q for the loos.
R for mo.
S for you, bog off.
T for 2.
U for mism.
V for Espania.
W for a quid.
X for breakfast.
Y for mistress.
Z for wind.

I'm not sure of the formula, or the answer, but that's the definition of the terms.
Click to expand...
I know that as the Cockney alphabet. It should be read out loud.
A for horses
B for honey
C for ships
D for Baghdad
E for brick
F for vescent
G of police
H 'for beauty
I for Novello
J for oranges
K for tonight
L for leather
M for cream
N for a penny
O for the rainbow
P for relief
Q for the bus
R for minute
S for you
T for two
U for cheek
V for la France
W for it
X for breakfast
Y for gawd's sake
Z for breezes
 
I think you can prove anything using statistics.
In fact I have the data to prove it.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
No, no, no, no, no.

A for horses.
B for mutton.
C for yourself.
D for dumb.
E for brick.
F for vescent.
G for police.
H for consent.
I for 1.
J for oranges.
K for resteraunt.
L for leather.
M for sis.
N for lope.
O for the wings of a dove.
P for relief.
Q for the loos.
R for mo.
S for you, bog off.
T for 2.
U for mism.
V for Espania.
W for a quid.
X for breakfast.
Y for mistress.
Z for wind.

I'm not sure of the formula, or the answer, but that's the definition of the terms.
Click to expand...

I don't like spelling bacon that way at all. It makes me feel small and dumb and unimportant so it must be absolute tripe!
 
Since I last posted on this 'ere thread, I've:
  • Made some salted caramel (for ice cream, I'll make the custard tomorrow)
  • Been to fetch my youngest (17) from the local theatre, where he's been providing first-aid cover with the St John Ambulance
  • Watched the end of Crimewatch
  • Watched yesterday's episode of Elementary
  • Enjoyed a glass and a half of NZ Sauvignon Blanc
  • Stacked the dishwasher
  • Put the compost bin out for collection

Knock, knock! Jabba! Is this thing on? Where's that 'proof' you should have posted in your OP, three hours ago?
 
Agatha said:
Since I last posted on this 'ere thread, I've:
  • Made some salted caramel (for ice cream, I'll make the custard tomorrow)
  • Been to fetch my youngest (17) from the local theatre, where he's been providing first-aid cover with the St John Ambulance
  • Watched the end of Crimewatch
  • Watched yesterday's episode of Elementary
  • Enjoyed a glass and a half of NZ Sauvignon Blanc
  • Stacked the dishwasher
  • Put the compost bin out for collection

Knock, knock! Jabba! Is this thing on? Where's that 'proof' you should have posted in your OP, three hours ago?
Click to expand...

Hit and run post, he won't be back. or if he does grace us with his presence then you can be sure that his appearance will not be accompanied by any proof.
 
Last edited:
P'raps he's found an error in his proofs and is rechecking them.

P'raps he's crafting a devastating argument.

P'raps you're right. :D

We may as well chat amongst ourselves.
 
Agatha said:
P'raps he's found an error in his proofs and is rechecking them.

P'raps he's crafting a devastating argument.

P'raps you're right. :D

We may as well chat amongst ourselves.
Click to expand...

If all goes according to the form book he will come back and tell us that he still has to collect the evidence, despite having worked on it for twenty years.
 
Agatha said:
Since I last posted on this 'ere thread, I've:
  • Made some salted caramel (for ice cream, I'll make the custard tomorrow)
  • Been to fetch my youngest (17) from the local theatre, where he's been providing first-aid cover with the St John Ambulance
  • Watched the end of Crimewatch
  • Watched yesterday's episode of Elementary
  • Enjoyed a glass and a half of NZ Sauvignon Blanc
  • Stacked the dishwasher
  • Put the compost bin out for collection

Knock, knock! Jabba! Is this thing on? Where's that 'proof' you should have posted in your OP, three hours ago?
Click to expand...

If he's right he has all eternity to post it.
 
TimCallahan said:
Okay,so do it.
Click to expand...


I think Jabba is going to present the argument he makes in the pages he linked to in post #3999 of the Shroud thread. See

forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=8757747#post8757747

Perhaps he has improved on this argument.
 
Last edited:
I believe immortality would be more boring than waiting for Jabba to prove immortality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom