May 2007 Stundie Nominations

From Revolutionary91@LC this is in the Press release thread, for the Final Insult. He was saying he wants a revolt, if The "film" is shut out by the evil do-gooders ( read JREFers ). He would be at FOX HQ to deal with them. When asked, why wait? He responds...
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=8846&st=0&#entry13456489

Because they would call me insane.

You need a reason to do near crazy things.

Yes, because if you have a reason, we won't call you insane, it will be... OK!
He seems to be aware, of his mental instability. Atleast, one of his personalities, anyway.
 
I realize this one's a bit long, but it's just so good, I had to nominate it.

1nzur3k70r said:
Loose Change is like the gateway drug to the 9/11 truth. It gets you hooked and then you want more. If you really had any interest in what really happened you wouldn't stop there. Loose Change serves to make you start asking questions doesn't necessarily intend to make conclusions and tends to make some generalizations.

Nevertheless the Hardcore Truth is too heavy for lightweights to handle. With symptoms like disturbing revelations, disillusionment all cooked up with some solid science and heavy doses of logic and common sense its not for the faint of heart. The Surgeon General does not approve.

Truth fiends can get their fix with any of the following dank truth nuggets:

9/11 Mysteries: Demolitions

9/11 — The Myth & The Reality

Link to post here
 
dailykoff said:
I don't know whose pants you pull these "KE" figures from, but the fact is that the towers were designed as moment frames, meaning that the impact of the planes, if indeed there were any, was absorbed by the steel frame and transfered to the foundations (i.e., the earth) in seconds, whereupon the frame returned to its original undeflected--and undeformed--condition.

link to post
 
Sweet zombie Jesus! Tell me he was joking! Please!

Nope, sad to say. "DK" is a real find - a hunt through the DU 9/11 forum will turn up quite a few gems from this poster.

DK does add a caveat several posts later (one I didn't see at the time - I'm sorry).

dailykoff said:
76. I said the "frames," not the "planes"
return to their undeflected and undeformed condition. Obviously that would exclude any broken columns.

This was in response to a poster who asked where the planes bounced to after rebounding from the towers. IMO it's still bad, and at least Stundie-nomination worthy (but just IMO).
 
George Hayduke on LC:



In fairness, he may be taking the p*ss. Hard to know, now...

HAHAHA, I love that thread.. Isn't that basically what happened in the 2010 movie? Where the obelisks made jupiter collapse into another star or whatever.. Ya, these guys don't take any of their ideas from watching too many movies or anything! :)
 
HAHAHA, I love that thread.. Isn't that basically what happened in the 2010 movie? Where the obelisks made jupiter collapse into another star or whatever.. Ya, these guys don't take any of their ideas from watching too many movies or anything! :)
They may not light up Jupiter, but they have lit up stupid. The stupid stick is on the loose, running rampant on that thread.
 
How can one not nominate the infantile, thumbsucking, smugness of this supposed smackdown from JackChit?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2588823#post2588823

(bolding mine, 'cuz it's my favorite part.... )

Ha Ha Ha you suckers picked the wrong side. lol no matter what you do the truth will out, you can try to supress it but you lose.
I will look forward to poking you with sticks.
You are in the stickiest situation since sticky the stick insect got stuck on a sticky bun.
lol lap of honour (or honor if you're an illiterate american)
 
These were not nominated yet, so I nominate these two from the LC press release:

The evidence we have collated for the movie has been fact-checked for accuracy by Dr. David Ray Griffin...

That is a funny one.


We didn’t want to believe the hoax of 9/11 but our heads and our hearts told us; that the official story just didn’t add up; that the laws of physics can’t lie; that 300 degree celsius fires can’t melt steel...

Who has ever said 300 degree celsius fires have melted steel? What a joke that one.

http://loosechange911.blogspot.com/2007/05/statement-from-louder-than-words-and.html
 
Last edited:
Okay, okay, okay! I've conceded already lack of knowledge of obscure Brit trivia. Too drunk right now to read the whole Wikipedia article. (Best friend in Hong Kong had a grand Grand Opening of her new bar, Fire.)

Harrumph!!!! Harrumph, I say! All of you'se!

That's alright. I had heard the name before, but for some reason thought it was book until I looked it up for that post... :o
 
Nominating Paddy @ LCF

paddy @ LCF said:
Have you read any of the official reports? Everyone agrees that the impact itself had no real affect on the structure.

(The bolding was done by paddy, not me)

Original post: (Now deleted)
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=8361&hl=

His full post cut & pasted at the link below prior to deletion:
http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?showtopic=1756&hl=

(I KNEW I should have taken a screenshot.....lesson learned)
 
Okay, okay, okay! I've conceded already lack of knowledge of obscure Brit trivia. Too drunk right now to read the whole Wikipedia article. (Best friend in Hong Kong had a grand Grand Opening of her new bar, Fire.)

Harrumph!!!! Harrumph, I say! All of you'se!
You have uncovered a person plagiarizing his posts, and that is true to jackchit's nature since he plagiarizes all his ideas on 9/11.
 

Back
Top Bottom