Mass Graves at a Cemetery?

Ohnoes said:
So instead of saying he didn't know they said he "sounded scripted and refused to comment".
Click to expand...



I've posted before that I have a friend who works in the funeral industry. Based on what he's told me of the new company he's working for, I suspect that this guy may have sounded "scripted" because he was following a script. That is, some funeral service companies have an actual script that their people are expected to follow. When you consider how emotionally charged a funeral can be, would you really want your people just speaking off the top of their heads? And when confronted by someone asking questions, I suspect someone used to following a script will tend to follow that script, or decide not to say anything, rather than risk screwing up.
 
malcolmxwarrior said:
This all seems like preparation for all the bodies that are gonna die in WW3.
Click to expand...



So, your theory is WWIII will be so lame, we'll actually have time to individually bury people in prepared graves?


Doesn't sond so bad as all that.
 
Is there a specific american custom of burying ex-servicemen in specific veteran graveyards, mandatory or an offer?

If so there will be a need for some big graveyards, there are alot of ex-servicemen around, and they don´t live forever. And what is wrong with expanding one with predug holes.
 
malcolmxwarrior said:
No, they're preparing mass graves.
Click to expand...

You really want to get freaked out? Go check out the city of Colma, California on Google Maps.;)

Massive cemeteries are not unusual in a country with a huge population and aren't unusual for veterans when so many ex-vets are dying of natural causes every day.
 
Travis said:
You really want to get freaked out? Go check out the city of Colma, California on Google Maps.;)

Massive cemeteries are not unusual in a country with a huge population and aren't unusual for veterans when so many ex-vets are dying of natural causes every day.
Click to expand...


The CTers will REALLY freak out when they find out about Arlington...
Colma is interesting , though. It most famous Resident is Wyatt Earp, buried in the Jewish section beleive it or not. His wife was from a fairly prominent San Francisco Jewish family.
 
malcolmxwarrior said:
No, they're preparing mass graves.
Click to expand...
whats the case for them being mass graves? all they seem to be saying is "they can fit more bodies in the graves if they dont use coffins"

but isnt that true of any grave and any burial throughout history? indeed any hole ever dug? what makes these so special?
 
Umm... the fact that they're installing vaults ("crypts") in these graves very strongly implies that they anticipate individual burials, done with the respect we normally give to our honored dead.

That is utterly inconsistent with the mass burial practices of any genocidal regime in history, which have run more to the "dump 'em in a ditch and cover it over" technique.

That the vaults could accommodate more than one burial implies nothing sinister. It's not uncommon for members of the same family to be buried in the same plot.

Cter "reasoning" just escapes me.
 
Travis said:
You really want to get freaked out? Go check out the city of Colma, California on Google Maps.;)

Massive cemeteries are not unusual in a country with a huge population and aren't unusual for veterans when so many ex-vets are dying of natural causes every day.
Click to expand...

I actually lived in Colma for about a year. Know what it's like to live in a town where the dead really do outnumber the living? Damned peaceful. I had to move because my girlfriend at the time was afraid of zombies, even though I have a shotgun and can get off headshots from an entirely defensible position. She wasn't buying it so off we went. In hindsight, I should've got rid of her and kept the house. But as we say in San Francisco, "one day, we all shall move to Colma."

Anyway, if you really want to see a NWO mass grave something impressive, check this out. 139,037 victims internments.
 
Last edited:
Horatius said:
So, your theory is WWIII will be so lame, we'll actually have time to individually bury people in prepared graves?


Doesn't sond so bad as all that.
Click to expand...

No, they're missing the main thing - if you can fit more bodies in there without caskets, that's alarming, but not enough. If people have been cremated, the ashes of hundreds would be needed to fill up each box. That means what, a million, just in that one cemetery, math is irrelevant when discussing evils. Worse yet, people will be cremated by the mass atomic detonations (all planned within by all top leaders, no state of "war" necessary), and just allowed to blow away in the wind. In this case, these "crypts" are really where the elites will hide until we all blow over. See, putting them in a graveyard is a disguise, not a direct clue, ya knuckleheads. Panic Planet denizens are forgetting the rigorous application of paranoia and going for the guttural blind alarmism that makes people nihilistic, stupid and dangerous, in a dumb way!

Thank you.
 
AJM8125 said:
I actually lived in Colma for about a year. Know what it's like to live in a town where the dead really do outnumber the living? Damned peaceful. I had to move because my girlfriend at the time was afraid of zombies, even though I have a shotgun and can get off headshots from an entirely defensible position. She wasn't buying it so off we went. In hindsight, I should've got rid of her and kept the house. But as we say in San Francisco, "one day, we all shall move to Colma."
Click to expand...

Zombies.:D

I used to live across the street from a cemetery too. I thought it was cool and the only problem I had was with teenagers drinking in the cemetery (why they decided to make that their drinking spot I'll never understand) then urinating on my front lawn after they were thoroughly drunk. I was somewhat accommodating at first but after awhile I just started calling the cops whenever I saw kids up there after dark.
 
Everything you need to know is here.


It makes sense to build these crypts and burial grounds before there are bodies to fill them with; in fact I'm sure it's a regular practice because a cemetary nearby my high school had unfilled tombs. Either way, the reasoning behind what I'm thinking is that you only have so long before somebody dies and the funeral before the body begins to decay, and building a crypt is kind of a big job.
 
dirtywick said:
Everything you need to know is here.


It makes sense to build these crypts and burial grounds before there are bodies to fill them with; in fact I'm sure it's a regular practice because a cemetary nearby my high school had unfilled tombs. Either way, the reasoning behind what I'm thinking is that you only have so long before somebody dies and the funeral before the body begins to decay, and building a crypt is kind of a big job.
Click to expand...

Uh, that is reasonable and logical which is precisely why the conspiranoids didn't think of it.
 
Toke said:
Is there a specific american custom of burying ex-servicemen in specific veteran graveyards, mandatory or an offer?

If so there will be a need for some big graveyards, there are alot of ex-servicemen around, and they don´t live forever. And what is wrong with expanding one with predug holes.
Click to expand...

Veterans and military service members who die in the line of duty all have the right to request to be buried in Arlington National Cemetery, from what I understand, but there is no custom, mandatory or otherwise, that I'm aware of that says veterans HAVE to be buried in a particular location. Considering that most people prefer to be buried near where their families live, I'd say most veterans would NOT want to be buried in a particular location, whether it's a cemetery specifically built for veterans or not.

My grandfather was a WWII and Korean veteran who died as a retired colonel, full-bird; as such, had he wanted to, he could have likely been buried in Arlington, but he chose to be buried near the area he was living in. Fort Lee DID send a full funeral detail to his funeral, but that's the extent of the involvement the military generally has with a veteran's or servicemember's funeral; the actual details, such as location, whether they want to be cremated or not, etc and so forth, are dictated by the soldier in question via a living will or other legal documentation. Granted, not all soldiers have those, but in those cases I believe they defer to the next of kin to determine burial rites. It is in no way dictated by the military or the government.
 
So, offer, fair enough.
Does the offer hold if someone left the military as a private 40 years ago?
That would raise the numbers alot, compared to dying on duty or as retired from service.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom