• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mark Roberts Interview on Skeptic Zone

Oh boy! A new Truther! Don't scare him away too quickly guys.

So, Congruentruth, what exactly do you feel is lacking when it comes to how the scientific method is being applied?
 
Makes me wonder what qualifications Alex Jones has other than looking 57 at 36 (that amazes me lol). What about Dillon, Korey, and Bermas? I would think their video has the most to do with 9/11 CT's popularity. BBC schooled Avery with one word. That was priceless to see his face. He knew the guy got him good.

To be fair. They are all good at one thing. Shamelessly promoting lies and disrespect.
 
Congruentruth said:
Sorry to pop that little bubble you have obviously been living in but the study I referred to has already gone global scientifically - the Japanese insisted that Obama open a new investigation on the back of it.BTW, nice try, but I still want to see Mr Roberts scientifically accredited and review investigative findings - or would you like another go at side-stepping.
Click to expand...

This is false. One MP in the relatively new government in Japan had once made a presentation to a previous administration in the Diet.

The general reception his presentation received was one of bemusement.

After the DJP got elected the MP's Trutherism was reheated a bit and he was asked whether he believed 9/11 Truth nonsense. He had to go on the public record as saying that the views are purely his and not the views of the DJP or his government and that he was, anyway, just asking questions.
 
Justin39640 said:
Makes me wonder what qualifications Alex Jones has other than looking 57 at 36 (that amazes me lol).
Click to expand...
Holy crap this is* insane! Is there a CT about the authenticity of his birth certificate?

What about Dillon, Korey, and Bermas? I would think their video has the most to do with 9/11 CT's popularity.
Click to expand...
Well, it was edited and backed by a theologian so BAM.

*He is 37 btw. This was the best way I could think of saying this without sounding like a d-bag.
 
Congruentruth said:
Here here, the first sensible descriptive remarks I have seen here!I have studied mr Roberts for some time now and have been puzzled.He has no relevant qualifications to tackle such a scientific and technical subject and seems to pad irrelevant topics out with detail obtained from equally unscientific sources.I admire his stance against 100's of highly qualified professionals knowing that their knowledge and experience is vastly superior to his especially as his position is so obviously untenable because they wield the sword of the scientific method. To watch a 'Liberal Democrat' openly shouting down protesters, some of them WW2 veterans, and humiliating people personally in public is not only perplexing, it's disturbing, but it's not the calibre of personality that is relevant here, but the ability to accurately reveal the truth.
Click to expand...

He used logic and critical thinking, something 911 truth does not use. There are zero highly qualified professionals who have done anything to support 911 truth lies, hearsay and fantasy. 911 truth's only product is perpetual failure.

911 truth only has moronic delusions, Gravy was able to expose their lies using knowledge, facts and evidence, the things 911 truth does not have.


Congruentruth said:
BTW Just what are Mr Robert's qualifications? Good grief, it's a simple enough question but every time I ask it people run away from it as if they were running from a grizzly bear.
Click to expand...
Knowledge and sound judgment; good grief, you could have figured this out yourself; what was stopping you?

Congruentruth said:
Sorry to pop that little bubble you have obviously been living in but the study I referred to has already gone global scientifically - the Japanese insisted that Obama open a new investigation on the back of it. ...
Click to expand...
? zero rational studies done by 911 truth, your bubble never existed, no need to pop yours. The only thing 911 truth had that went global, stupidity.

Congruentruth said:
... the ability to accurately reveal the truth.
Click to expand...
Is not found with 911 truth. As they spread lies, do you support 911 truth, or upset someone is able to refute all 911 truth as using knowledge and critical thinking skills?

Gravy must of listened in school, I bet he is able to read and comprehend at levels 911 truth movement members have not reached. Why are you upset a smart person refute liars with knowledge, including PhD liars who spread hearsay, false opinions, and idiotic nonsense. If you read Jones' work, you see he made up thermite; anyone can see that, so did Gravy. Have you failed to figure out 911?
 
Last edited:
Tippit said:
The problem with you, Roberts, is that you repeat ad nauseum about how the debunkers are "right" about everything, and the truthers are "wrong" about everything. Of course this is necessary for you because none of the truther's claims can be true in order for your worldview to be maintained. But the reality is, most of the "facts" surrounding 9/11 are either unknowable, conjecture, or depend upon a government and media with no credibility what-so-ever. Your mind apparently cannot deal in probabalistic reasoning, and therefore you must make assumptions that every piece of evidence surrounding 9/11 must be accepted and labeled as "true" or "false", "correct" or "incorrect". It's this mental impairment which leads you to make such ridiculous, all encompassing statements that you're famous for, and it's why you have zero credibility with me.
Click to expand...

And the above is why you have zero credibility with me.
 
mchapman said:
Well you haven't shown his information is 100% false.

Another witness to basement explosions has just died in an extremely suspicious suicide.

I don't believe that Muslims alone were responsible for the 911 attacks.
Click to expand...
Evidence?
 
dtugg said:
Hmm, odd, Red ignored me. I can only conclude that is is a double liar here. He does not have a theory better than NIST's and he does not always answer direct questions asked of him. Odd.
Click to expand...

I once asked him for his full theory,but he refused to answer.
 
dafydd said:
It certainly won't change what happened.
Click to expand...
It would make it easy to round up Axe-murderers - just announce Charlie Sheen is doing a talk on 911 with DRG and Jones, you capture all the dolts at once.

Zombie thread, cool... closet truther, or someone upset Gravy can figure out 911 based on knowledge and sound judgment. ? Was it a key phrase that awakened the new 911 truth defender? When you hear... "Afghanistan Bananastan", attack Gravy ...

Gravy can read and comprehend; learning. He has something, sure got this guy upset.
 
mchapman said:
Have you guys forgotten that a B25 hit the empire state? I should think all Manhattan sky scrapers were designed with plane impacts in mind, and we know for a fact the twin towers were.
Click to expand...

Didn't do much good though

The Crash
At 9:49 a.m., the ten-ton, B-25 bomber smashed into the north side of the Empire State Building. The majority of the plane hit the 79th floor, creating a hole in the building eighteen feet wide and twenty feet high. The plane's high-octane fuel exploded, hurtling flames down the side of the building and inside through hallways and stairwells all the way down to the 75th floor.

World War II had caused many to shift to a six-day work week; thus there were many people at work in the Empire State Building that Saturday. The plane crashed into the offices of the War Relief Services of the National Catholic Welfare Conference. Catherine O'Connor described the crash. The plane exploded within the building. There were five or six seconds - I was tottering on my feet trying to keep my balance - and three-quarters of the office was instantaneously consumed in this sheet of flame. One man was standing inside the flame. I could see him. It was a co-worker, Joe Fountain. His whole body was on fire. I kept calling to him, "Come on, Joe; come on, Joe." He walked out of it.2 Joe Fountain died several days later. Eleven of the office workers were burned to death, some still sitting at their desks, others while trying to run from the flames.

One of the engines and part of the landing gear hurtled across the 79th floor, through wall partitions and two fire walls, and out the south wall's windows to fall onto a twelve-story building across 33rd Street. The other engine flew into an elevator shaft and landed on an elevator car. The car began to plummet, slowed somewhat by emergency safety devices. Miraculously, when help arrived at the remains of the elevator car in the basement, the two women inside the car were still alive.

Some debris from the crash fell to the streets below, sending pedestrians scurrying for cover, but most fell onto the buildings setbacks at the fifth floor. Still, a bulk of the wreckage remained stuck in the side of the building. After the flames were extinguished and the remains of the victims removed, the rest of the wreckage was removed through the building.
 
Last edited:
tomwaits said:
Ok, this thread should probably end. When a truther is making these statements:




then I think it's time to realize we are dealing with an irrational mind, and therefore argument is impossible.
Click to expand...

You can't be both rational and a truther.
 
RedIbis said:
Seriously, you guys can't actually find out whether or not skyscrapers are designed to withstand airplane impact?

Seriously?
Click to expand...

Why don't you learn a bit about engineering and find out for yourself.
 
adversity1 said:
I've only been on these boards for a couple months and it's obvious that you're lying here. You have fled direct confrontation many times.
Click to expand...

The red bird has flown the coop many a time when the going gets hot.
 
RedIbis said:
If you ask me a direct, non rhetorical question, in which you are sincerely interested in the answer, I will respond in kind.

Around here, I get bombarded with disingenuous rhetorical questions, when there is little or no attempt to adress the questions I ask.
Click to expand...

Here is a direct question. Will you please state your full 911 theory?
 
Congruentruth said:
BTW Just what are Mr Robert's qualifications? Good grief, it's a simple enough question but every time I ask it people run away from it as if they were running from a grizzly bear.
Click to expand...

t dosn't matter what his qualifications are. His conclusions are based on fact, and can be proven as fact.

(BTW, he's a tour guide in NYC. I am not sure what or any other education he may or may not have. )

What are your's?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom