• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mark Roberts Interview on Skeptic Zone

HyJinX said:
When you actually have an independent thought in your head...let us know. As for a religious belief among debunkers...the last time using science, facts and irrefuatable evidence was a religion was when?
Click to expand...

what irrefutable evidence have you ever presented of anything?
 
mchapman said:
They are used to having a religious belief in the official story. Independent thinking confuses them.
Click to expand...

By religious belief you mean strict scientific approach based only on identifiable facts and indepth research backed by many of the worlds top experts and documented research including engineering papers and mathematics?

And by independent thinking, you mean having beliefs that are based only on political opinion and can't be backed by any facts or proven?

You can't even tell us your own beliefs in this matter. How sad is that? You can't think for yourself and you have a religious cult belief in these conspiracy theories that you know you cannot defend. How sad is that?
 
Jonnyclueless said:
By religious belief you mean strict scientific approach based only on identifiable facts and indepth research backed by many of the worlds top experts and documented research including engineering papers and mathematics?

And by independent thinking, you mean having beliefs that are based only on political opinion and can't be backed by any facts or proven?

You can't even tell us your own beliefs in this matter. How sad is that? You can't think for yourself and you have a religious cult belief in these conspiracy theories that you know you cannot defend. How sad is that?
Click to expand...

You got that positive ID on the hijackers yet? Come on, whats the delay, you got the worlds most toppermost experts and science and stuff. Where is it?
 
mchapman said:
You got that positive ID on the hijackers yet? Come on, whats the delay, you got the worlds most toppermost experts and science and stuff. Where is it?
Click to expand...

Just go look at the evidence from the trials. It's there.

Have you provided a more plausible hypothesis yet? Where is it? Are you too afraid to back up your own beliefs? Why do you keep avoiding the issue?

And had it been pointed out that Mark Roberts was wrong, i would have seen it. It is in bad form to lie on this forum, so please stop lying.
 
I'm appalled at the unmitigated GALL, and delicious irony, of a truther chiding us for not having 'irrefutable evidence'. Taken as a body, the evidence that supports what they so ignorantly call the official story is pretty compelling to a rational person--especially when nothing even remotely better has been presented to replace it.
 
mchapman said:
Perhaps you missed my posts earlier that completely proved beyond any doubt that Mark Roberts is wrong about the holocaust deniers.
Click to expand...

Please point to such posts...because I've read this entire thread and, well, I can honestly call you a liar for your post above. Please detail such posts and why you believe them to prove what you claim.

Thanks.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
Ghandi was never elected...
Click to expand...

in addition...these presidents were never elected leaders either....

Millard Fillmore
Chester Arthur
Gerald Ford
William Taft
Warren Harding

Yet they were publicly accepted as such.
 
mchapman said:
We dont need to look far for the leader of the debunking movement. He is on this very thread, ignoring facts and oozing righteous indignation, with all his followers dutifully defending him.
Click to expand...


I think the fact that very few posters have heeded Mark's suggestion to ignore you speaks volumes against your claim that he is some kind of "leader of the debunking movement".

Also, your post was a complete non-answer. Surely that must bother you on some level.
 
It takes absolutely no effort to sit there and claim evidence is not convincing enough for one's self. That's not research, that's fraud. That takes no effort. Real research is doing work and proving your beliefs. It's at the very least finding a plausible hypothesis. Anyone can try to poke holes at someone else's hypothesis. But if that person themselves have no hypothesis to present themselves, then they are simply a fraud.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
I think the fact that very few posters have heeded Mark's suggestion to ignore you speaks volumes against your claim that he is some kind of "leader of the debunking movement".

Also, your post was a complete non-answer. Surely that must bother you on some level.
Click to expand...

... not that Mark's advice was not good advice, but I just have a problem resisting the urge to poke dead things with a stick...
 
...and yet that never happened. Where did that happen?

oh...and can you answer my request from post #411?
 
Last edited:
One more liar goes into the ignore file, only to be removed when banned for being a sock puppet.
 
Now that our new bevy of 9/11 Deniers have dropped their pants, it's time for this thread to go away.

Mods?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom