• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mark Embarrasses Kevin Ryan

Aggs said:
Tsk tsk, you guys totally missed the smackdown that was given by Col. Jenny Sparks:

"What the hell time is it where you're at? And you're tag teaming Kevin not only in the middle of the bloody night, but HOURS after his posts? Possibly to avoid a REAL arguments?"

Sheesh, I was a fan of Gravy, but if he's not going to make his posts during normal business hours.....
Click to expand...

Well, Jenny doesn't seem to understand how the Internet works...
 
pomeroo said:
Mark's smackdown of the cowardly fraud Kevin Ryan deserves to be more widely circulated. Notice how the morons pay no attention whatever to the beating their hero is getting.

http://911blogger.com/node/8038?page=1
Click to expand...
It is so weird how different people can look at samething and see 2 different results. Why is Mark Roberts not meeting for these debates? Having just watch Roberts & Fetzer. One huge issue is that Roberts produces evidence that cannot be verified and could easily be part of coverup. Then he says plane that hit Pentagon was destroyed, but then bodies were found inside strapped to seats. How did bodies survive when plane was destroyed? Why have no proof of this ever been produced? Why does Roberts try to avoid talking about the 47 core columns & 240 exterior columns? and why does Roberts think one witness view of incident is accurate? it is just a opinion. Why does Robert's think because he makes a statement it is fact? Every piece of evidence he produced could be fake.
 
So, you could also say that every piece of evidence the "truth movement" produces could be fake, could you not?
 
Last edited:
lisabob2 said:
Why is Mark Roberts not meeting for these debates? Having just watch Roberts & Fetzer.
Click to expand...

He's challenged Kevin Ryan and DR Griffin to debate.

Both of them are still running in the opposite direction.
 
lisabob2 said:
One huge issue is that Roberts produces evidence that cannot be verified and could easily be part of coverup.
Click to expand...


You mean all the stuff that he has citation for source so you can easily go and see for yourself where it came from?

"There are none so blind as those that refuse to see"
 
If Mark gets turned down when he asks them to debate, why should he be kind enough to accept theirs?
 
My latest stalker lisabob2 has made virtually the same incoherent post three times today, twice bumping ancient threads. Pure troll. Welcome to ignore, lisabob. Please seek help for your problems.
 
Last edited:
lisabob2 said:
It is so weird how different people can look at samething and see 2 different results. Why is Mark Roberts not meeting for these debates? Having just watch Roberts & Fetzer. One huge issue is that Roberts produces evidence that cannot be verified and could easily be part of coverup. Then he says plane that hit Pentagon was destroyed, but then bodies were found inside strapped to seats. How did bodies survive when plane was destroyed? Why have no proof of this ever been produced? Why does Roberts try to avoid talking about the 47 core columns & 240 exterior columns? and why does Roberts think one witness view of incident is accurate? it is just a opinion. Why does Robert's think because he makes a statement it is fact? Every piece of evidence he produced could be fake.
Click to expand...
Can you explain this post; you messed up everything. Why are you unable to understand 9/11? Better yet, why can't you provide facts and evidence to support the idiots you want mark to debate?

Yes, Ryan is an idiot on 9/11. He has not made one rational conclusion on 9/11, and you support him? I have yet to find someone who can support Ryan with facts and evidence. And you are proving it again. And Ryan, he is proving he is delusional on 9/11 topics. How can you support Ryan, and you must understand, there is no real debate with delusional people, they will rant on some made up topic. Like your posts, they make no sense and can not be debated, they are just obtuse fantasies of 9/11 tripe and you fail to even make a point or expose your own ideas on 9/11.

Did you even see the moronic support Ryan gets from the researched challenged 9/11 truth patsie followers?


Pure stupid how they hide the posts the morons vote down! Good job on that pathetic web site of woo tripe. Pure stupid. I hate wasting time reading when you have to click to read the rational posts!!! 9/11 truth web site, is full of morons. Who runs that web site for morons to hang out and post 9/11 crap?
 
Last edited:
Mark Embarrasses Kevin Ryan
Click to expand...


Eh, I think for the most part, Ryan embarrasses himself. This guy is a professional scientist!?
 
Last edited:
lisabob2 said:
It is so weird how different people can look at samething and see 2 different results.
Click to expand...
It's the difference between seeing reality and seeing what you want to see. Your silly movement couldn't exist otherwise.
 
So if I understand correctly, Lisa is saying that if any part of a crashed plane is left over, that it can't be considered destroyed? I would like to see her definition of destroyed. Does this involve annihilation of matter?

"Hey bob, a couple seats with some people strapped in and some engine parts were found, should we take her for a spin next week?"

I guess the WTC wasn't destroyed either because some random pieces were found. Surprised people didn't go back to work there the next day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom