March Stundie Nominations

[Horatius]

.
Okay, I've been waiting for someone else to use it but, these were leap light years -- all those extra days add up...
.

No, they would have to have been Light Leap Years, so they'd be a few days shorter.

 

[TSR]

No, they would have to have been Light Leap Years, so they'd be a few days shorter.

.
But if the light is leaping, surely surely it's going faster...
.

 

[Horatius]

.
But if the light is leaping, surely surely it's going faster...
.

But it's leaping over days, so it's not using those extra days to travel, so it's effectively going slower.........I think I just broke something......

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

JihadJane illustrates both her grasp of the obvious and her complete obliviousness simultaneously.

There is a problem with having too much energy. It allows us to do too much work.

 

[TSR]

But it's leaping over days, so it's not using those extra days to travel, so it's effectively going slower.........I think I just broke something......

.
As my son would be wont to say: "Is brokeded, Horrorshus -- you fits? *Fits* it, Horrorshus, FITS!"
.

 

[Newtons Bit]

Looks like we have another rising star:

Done some looking at what you provided and it seems that no "true" audit has taken place.

why would the fed transfer out 755 TRILLION dollars in 2008? the actions clearly show intentional behavior that could only lead to the undermining of the dollar on a major scale.

For someone who claims this is a critical thinking forum, there is a significant lack of double checking the size of ones figures....

 

[ElMondoHummus]

Wait...

When you consider the billions of light years a race would have to potentially travel, it could take 400 years just to travel a million light years even while going the speed of light. That is hardly an efficient manner.

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/57591-confirmed-ufos-ets-are-real-3.html#post3004527

Maybe they are really small light years.

Maybe not a flat surface?



Look, I really think we can take this jok-... er, explanation somewhere. I mean, think about it: Like a map representing irregular terrain? Maybe he was using a flat map, and can we really use such a flat, 2 dimensional object to accurately describe...

... wait for it...

Curved Space

 

[Dog Town]

there is a significant lack of double checking the size of ones figures....

She's a girl. All they care about, is if their ass looks big in those pants.

 

[twinstead]

She's a girl. All they care about, is if their ass looks big in those pants.

Oh no he di'int!

 

[Dave Rogers]

I know this isn't eligible because it doesn't refer to any conspiracy theory, but it's maybe worth pointing out that it isn't just CTs that can inflict cruel and unusual punishment on elementary logic.

1, 2, 3, 4, ..., 23, 24, 25, 26, ?

The data above are very likely natural numbers and there is no reason for not replacing the question mark with 27. But would a true atheist replace "?" with the number of books in The New Testament? The question mark is a symbol that ends questions, and questions are answered the best with the help of scientific atheism, coz the rational answers can't be found in the 27 books of The New Testament where Jesus is the hero. So if you replace the missing number with 27, then you are a false atheist, not a true atheist. Of course, by chosing other number than 27, you flunk the admission test to the kindergarten, BUT the atheists are here to suffer for all of us. God bless them profusely and vehemently.

Our preferred targets don't have a monopoly on stupid.

Dave

 

[Spindrift]

I know this isn't eligible because it doesn't refer to any conspiracy theory, but it's maybe worth pointing out that it isn't just CTs that can inflict cruel and unusual punishment on elementary logic.



Our preferred targets don't have a monopoly on stupid.

Dave

I read that four times trying to understand it and now I'm suffering from over-exposure to stupid.

 

[Debaser]

I read that four times trying to understand it and now I'm suffering from over-exposure to stupid.

Apparently, the True Atheist can't use any number (and presumably word) contained in any or all versions of the Bible?

 

[timhau]

Apparently, the True Atheist can't use any number (and presumably word) contained in any or all versions of the Bible?

But what if we want to refer to the curious fact that Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin and Jim Morrison all died when they were tweee.... uh... twenteee.... I mean 2/*$££... AARGH!!!! I CAN'T EVEN WRITE IT!!!

 

[jargon buster]

If we are being logical the next thing in the sequence would be ...,

 

[timhau]

If we are being logical the next thing in the sequence would be ...,

Ah, so you can't write it either?

I like you.

 

[Alferd_Packer]

If we are being logical the next thing in the sequence would be ...,

42

 

[Sabretooth]

42

/thread

er...wait...what is the subject again?

 

[jargon buster]

I can write it, the next item is three full stops and a comma = ...,

 

[timhau]

42

Oh, you Jesus freaks are just trying to mask tweh... tnewty... THAT NUMBER by adding 15 to it! True atheists will not be fooled!!

 

[TSR]

Oh, you Jesus freaks are just trying to mask tweh... tnewty... THAT NUMBER by adding 15 to it! True atheists will not be fooled!!

.
Math Works In Mysterious Ways, Its Wonders To Perform.

I mean, look at it. We have one, then we have another one, and suddenly there are two.

But only if they are a man and a woman.

And doesn't The Book tell us to go out and ***multiply***? How much more do you need before you stop trying to sow division in the ranks?
.