March Stundie Nominations

DGM said:
This comes from an "expert" quoted in a prison planet article

The "expert" physicist John Wyndam:
Click to expand...

There's a blast from the past.

For what it's worth, "John Wyndam" is probably a pseudonym. I have seen no evidence that this guy has any training in Physics at all, let alone a Ph.D.

ETA: Eh... I better take that back. It could be this guy, though if so he's speaking well out of his field. There's a cluster of "gone crazy in old age" Truthers, he might be one of them.
 
Last edited:
From our newest sock (who will be banned soon enough) Roscoe the first
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5689179&postcount=132
roscoe_the_first said:
<snip>
250407_binLaden-Brzezinski.jpg

On the left Zbigniew Brzezinski on the right Osama Bin Laden.
Click to expand...

So he is claiming that this is Brzezinski and Osama Bin Laden. Take a good look at the picture...
 
R.Mackey said:
There's a blast from the past.

For what it's worth, "John Wyndam" is probably a pseudonym. I have seen no evidence that this guy has any training in Physics at all, let alone a Ph.D.

ETA: Eh... I better take that back. It could be this guy, though if so he's speaking well out of his field. There's a cluster of "gone crazy in old age" Truthers, he might be one of them.
Click to expand...
You were thinking the old SF writer (who died in 1969), too?
 
I'm assuming we can nominate a scanned image, because this is just priceless.

Birther leader Orly Taitz wants to run for Secretary of State of California... but apparently doesn't understand the concept of, you know, READING the form and actually putting in what it asks for instead of random crap...

Intent-to-run.jpg


http://crazyinternetpeople.blogspot.com/2010/03/orly-taitz-for-secretary-of-state-talk.html

Arus found the image though; if this wins, Arus deserves the credit for it, not me.
 
Sabrina said:
I'm assuming we can nominate a scanned image, because this is just priceless.

Birther leader Orly Taitz wants to run for Secretary of State of California... but apparently doesn't understand the concept of, you know, READING the form and actually putting in what it asks for instead of random crap...

[qimg]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0ysh23XOD0U/S5ARvxSOKPI/AAAAAAAAAOY/3HpBneMY6Og/s1600-h/Intent-to-run.jpg[/qimg]

http://crazyinternetpeople.blogspot.com/2010/03/orly-taitz-for-secretary-of-state-talk.html

Arus found the image though; if this wins, Arus deserves the credit for it, not me.
Click to expand...

That makes me wonder what her tax filings look like.
 
Oh, this has to win.

jammonius said:
I also cite "Wally" Miller as a source and have done so in this thread. I may have been the first to mention his name in this thread and to quote him. I think his statements are contradictory, ambiguous at best. I do not think he is your go to person for DNA proof.
Click to expand...
 
talk about a childlike understanding of gravity . . . .

Heiwa said:
I like gravity, i.e. the attractive force between masses. And when a small, weak structural top part C (mostly air) of a skyscraper is attracted to the bigger and stronger bottom part A of same skyscraper, C can never apply sufficient force (and energy) to crush A.
Anyone with more than a child-like understanding of gravity and physics can see that. I just explain in simple terms why it is like that.
Click to expand...

http://boards.trutv.com/showpost.php?p=39051&postcount=216

What an idiot.
 
I have taken Bill Smith off of ignore, just to read this...

I nominate Bill Smith for this gem
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5691759&postcount=150

bill smith said:
Several reasons. I think flight 93 was under remote control. That's why they could not abort at takeoff. Ground crew might have seen that there were no passengers and on a day where several other planes had been hijacked the cat would definitely have been out of the bag.

They also couldn't risk actually crashing it because then the lack of passengers would definitely have been seen.

So they landed at Cleveland and faked a crash site at Shanksville. You notice that at Cleveland the plane was rushed to a 'secure area' where no count of passengers was released ? Somewhere far from prying eyes I suspect.

So in the light of all this it's very easy to see why they are now in so much trouble with WTC7 and absolutely should be with flight 93. The only reason that flight 93 has not been looked into far more closely is that they made it into something of a taboo subject to question by playing the emotional card to ridiculous extremes and researchers tended to steer clear. There was after all enough other stuff to look at and without so much emotional baggage..

It's an absolute miracle that the perps have not been arrested long ago. 9/11 was an absolute mess after the twin forced errors of WTC7 and flight 93.
Click to expand...

the whole post is stundie worthy.. but I particularly like the bolded parts.

And if it was a remote controlled jet with no passengers.... why didn't they just crash it into a field? And why would you land in cleveland to let off passengers who weren't on it in the first place?
 
Last edited:
This from the Outlaw Forum:

LINK


When Obama is on the radio talking about a devastating earthquake in Chile then I'm extremely suspicious .
Some reporter says its 800 times more powerful then the Haiti one

How often do earthquakes normally happen around the world

I believe this is happening way too often - very convenient for the criminal cult to keep governments around the world under control
Click to expand...


The Outlaw Forum seems to be a rich vein of Stupidity. More accomplished Stundie-miners than I may uncover more gems.
 
TruthersLie said:
And if it was a remote controlled jet with no passengers.... why didn't they just crash it into a field? And why would you land in cleveland to let off passengers who weren't on it in the first place?
Click to expand...

The NWO works in mysterious ways
 
Tony Szamboti said:
They flew planes into the buildings to make everyone think that was the cause.

Interestingly, the collapses actually inititiated above the major aircraft impact damage, so the NIST was forced to pretty much say fire alone caused the collapses. The only thing the NIST could use the aircraft impact for was to try and say it removed fire proofing material from the steel causing it to heat up faster.
Click to expand...

Not spectacular but noted for it's bizarreness and spirit in fictional story telling :|
He should write a novel.
 
Last edited:
This is hiliarious from a recently new poster:

PookztA said:
AJM8125 said:
No.

She got to the Supreme Court and ran out of appeals. That isn't a stall. It's a fail.

Juan Luis Pedro Phillipo de Huevos Epstein
Independent Jerk
BFD/FU
Click to expand...
you are correct sir, but the fact that her evidence made it all the way to the supreme court before it stalled then was dismissed, speaks on behalf of her evidence.

things don't go to the Supreme Court unless they are evidence-based and scientifically sound.
Click to expand...


http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5694361&postcount=33
 
I nominate PookztA for bringing us a retro look at the not-so-brilliant work of Judy Wood and getting suspended in one day after a marathon all-nighter spent spamming the 9/11 thread with 68 posts of long-debunked carp instead of studying for his med exams.
PookztA said:
So there you have it, these buildings fell virtually uninhibited, nearly as fast as a billiard ball being dropped from the top of the buildings. In other words, if these massive steel buildings were to race a free falling billiard ball to the ground, one of the buildings beat the billiard ball to the ground, and the other was only 0.78 to 1.78 seconds behind the free falling billiard ball!

This is impossible considering all of the resistance the steel, concrete, and aluminum would have provided, UNLESS an enormous amount of extra energy was added to the buildings to completely remove their support structures, which would then allow the buildings to fall as fast as the free falling billiard ball.

I will let you draw your OWN conclusions from this simple comparison.
Click to expand...

Poor PooktzA. All of his threads were closed by morning.:covereyes
 
sylvan8798 said:
I nominate PookztA for bringing us a retro look at the not-so-brilliant work of Judy Wood and getting suspended in one day after a marathon all-nighter spent spamming the 9/11 thread with 68 posts of long-debunked carp instead of studying for his med exams.


Poor PooktzA. All of his threads were closed by morning.:covereyes
Click to expand...

Out of compassion,I think.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom