Rob Lister
Unregistered
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
- Messages
- 8,504
But then we'd have to provide them with benefits. Could have been what held back Dixie's economy.
Heh.
But seriously, I've heard very few reasonably objections thus far.
The more debate I read against it (what little there is so far) the more I like it.
This prop puts the very-much failed (as all knew it would) McCain-Feingold in complete context.
Can't beat 'em, join 'em. Let the states get in on the action.
I figure
each off-year House election will yeild at least $10m per state. Double that for on-year elections.
each off-year Senate election will yeild at least $100m per state. Double that for on-year elections.
I can't really hazard a guess but (I will) guess that each Pres election will yeild at least $500m (fewer candidates allowed but each invited to all debates).
Okay...so I just started the ball rolling with an e-bay style auction type bid. There are several variations of that. What would yeild the most profit?
Come on. Embrase your patriotic capitalistic instinct. Do it for your country. Better the idea.
Last edited:
