Ed Madeleine McCann Mystery

Hey Rolfe is still bumping the thread they claim to hate. :D

Thanks.

Also it's great the way you compare an abducted child to a missing cat. </sarcasm>
 
Yeah. If people can get that anxious about a competent, free-spirited adult cat going missing (and believe me, it's not just me), then how much more anxious are they likely to get about a child not yet four years old?

And where exactly did I "claim to hate" this thread? I think it's a crock of nonsense. Do you think that gives you a free pass to post rubbish unchallenged?

Rolfe.
 
Last edited:
Rolfe said:
Yeah. If people can get that anxious about a competent, free-spirited adult cat going missing (and believe me, it's not just me), then how much more anxious are they likely to get about a child not yet four years old?

And where exactly did I "claim to hate" this thread? I think it's a crock of nonsense. Do you think that gives you a free pass to post rubbish unchallenged?

Rolfe.
Click to expand...

Nope but the only action it has seen is after you post and bump it to the top again.
 
If you look at the dates and the times on the posts, you'll see that mine have been entirely reactive, and it was in fact Beattie (to whose argument I was responding) who bumped the thread.

Rolfe.
 
Beattie said:
1. A Private Company was incorporated 12 days after Madeleiene
went missing to receive donations from the Public, a website set
up to sell Merchandise...........How could the Parents know their
daughter would not be found in the interim?
Click to expand...

Are you kidding me?

Really?

That's the single stupidest thing I think I've ever read on this forum.

A forum with conspiracy theories coming out of the walls, ghosts, psychics, homoeopaths and creationists and that is the single stupidest comment I've ever seen.
 
That's the single stupidest thing I think I've ever read on this forum.
Click to expand...

+1
Its tantamount to saying "Dont do anything just in case something else happens"
What a world we would live in if we all thought like that.
 
I'm not going to read this whole thread, but if you you at thethreearguidos forum and the mccann files, you will see more than enough evidence to suggest the mccanns covered it up. The reason i dont read or discuss this anymore is because its really annoying to see people swallow up the rubbish that the media feeds them in this case. the detective who was incharge of the investigation wrote a book called the truth of the lie and outlined how the mccanns were involved and covered it up. Of course the brittish media claimed he was an evil mad foreigner who was angry that he got kicked off the investigation.

Its annoying.
 
For all of you people dismissing this, why dont you actually do some research other than what the paper tells you? Go back and read the transcripts of their testamonys that show them constantly changing their stories when holes were picked in their story.

Go back and read about how kate mccann refused to answer 40 questions when interviewed, does that sound like something a concerned mother would do?

Go and look at the mountins of evidence that was presented but not reported in the brittish media, i.e the cadaver odour in the room and on "cuddlecat" and in the boot of the mcccanns hire car, the badly composed dna that was still a match for madeliene.
 
Do you know, if the mccanns had nothing to do with it, a opportunist killer must have broke into the apartment, killed her, kept her there for 2 hours and hid while members of the tapas 9 took turns to look in on the kids (lucky for him none of them actually looked in the room) then knowing she was dead and standing there for two hours he finally decided to take her for some reason. Makes perfect sense!

Or is it more likely, that two selfish parents who would rather neglect their kids and go drinking with their friends, decided to sedate their kids (because they were heard crying nights before while they were at a restaurant) so they could go and have a good time drinking, only to accidently kill their daughter, then rather than going to jail they set up a whole elaborate story to make it seem like she had been abducted, why wouldnt the mccanns lets the police test the other twins for sedatives? They refused and only agreed to it after 60 days (i think) when they knew any traces would be out of their system.
 
Mushy, I see from your posting history that you believe in Bigfoot, UFOs, ghosts and you are a global warming "skeptic". Please excuse me for not taking you seriously in any way at all.

Personally I find the demonizing of the McCanns sickening. There is no credible evidence supporting this silly, vile conspiracy theory.
 
That's an ad-hom. Which doesn't necessarily mean that it isn't a valid observation. :D

Rolfe.
 
.
Yeah, any parent who could see themselves sedating their child under any but the most serious circumstances is stupid. After all:

While it might seem like a quick and easy solution to potential problems you might have when flying with young kids, most pediatricians try to discourage parents from giving kids anything to sedate them on an airplane. The benefits usually don't outweigh the risks.

Can't recall right now where I got that link (I think it was somewhere in this thread), but surely, we can agree that someone taking this statement as "certainly recommending" that a parent give their child Benadryl just to quiet them would stupid. Right, TT?
.
 
Last edited:
I once met a Dutch doctor who said he gave his young child nitrazepam on a fairly regular basis. Not that I approve, just sayin'.

Rolfe.
 
Rolfe said:
That's an ad-hom. Which doesn't necessarily mean that it isn't a valid observation. :D

Rolfe.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know it's an ad-hom. I won't edit it because I believe that a post can indeed by judged by the general credibility of the poster.
 
I could laugh at you "skeptics" most of what he believes is wrong, therefore everything he says is wrong. Instead of using that approach, why don't you look though all the records, official police records people at thethreearguidos forum have gotten and translated into english, go and look at it, even compare how the story was reported in the media in both portugal and england. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out something is wrong.

Everything points to them sedating her and killing her, then covering it up to save their medical liscences.

How suspect does a story have to be before you call ******** on it? Just go and look at how many times they changed their statements, and how they contradicted each other etc etc.

Look at their reactions to things, cadaver odour found in hire car - mccanns "oh we had rotten meat in the boot" (this ignores the fact witnesses saw them open the boot to air it out all night before the tests were done). But does that seem like a logical response, your daughter has been abduced and they find a "death odour" in your hire car, wouldnt the first response be... lets see who has rented this car recently?
 
TSR said:
.
Yeah, any parent who could see themselves sedating their child under any but the most serious circumstances is stupid. After all:

While it might seem like a quick and easy solution to potential problems you might have when flying with young kids, most pediatricians try to discourage parents from giving kids anything to sedate them on an airplane. The benefits usually don't outweigh the risks.

Can't recall right now where I got that link (I think it was somewhere in this thread), but surely, we can agree that someone taking this statement as "certainly recommending" that a parent give their child Benadryl just to quiet them would stupid. Right, TT?
.
Click to expand...

I agree. I'm the one that posted the link for that reason. However there's a liability issue involved with recommending giving a kid a sedative on a plane, not to mention that if there was an adverse reaction the kid is stuck up in the air. I agree it is a very stupid thing for someone to do. But it doesn't mean they don't do it.

Rolfe said:
I once met a Dutch doctor who said he gave his young child nitrazepam on a fairly regular basis. Not that I approve, just sayin'.

Rolfe.
Click to expand...

Not sure what nitrazepam is, but as I said earlier I could certainly see a doctor doing this. In fact there isn't anything WRONG with them doing it because they ARE doctors.

The problem isn't them sedating their child, it's the age of the child and leaving them alone in a room.

I agree with the idea that it adds up.

I also agree that anything that came out afterwards as far as campaigns and what not are not any sort of indicator of guilt.

However the story they say doesn't add up.

To me the most logical conclusion is that they doped their kid and sat around the corner having drinks. This was dumb, simply because if the kid DID have some sort of bad reaction to the medication they weren't in the room.

Then someone did abduct the child and gave her another sedative to knock her out and she died from an overdose.
 
Last edited:
Why are you so enthusiastic about the "drinks" bit? They were having dinner.

If the parents gave their children anything, it would have been a benzodiazepine. Probably temazepam. That stuff is bomb-proof safe to a pretty high overdose ceiling.

Rolfe.
 
Last edited:
Rolfe said:
Why are you so enthusiastic about the "drinks" bit? They were having dinner.

If the parents gave their children anything, it would have been a benzodiazepine. Probably temazepam. That stuff is bomb-proof safe to a pretty high overdose ceiling.

Rolfe.
Click to expand...

OK dinner. What I mean by their actions is that it was unnecessary. There were nanny services in the hotel. It would have been very simple to leave a nanny with the kids sleeping.

And as I've said, it's not what they did per se that is the problem. It is the age of the kids when they did it. Grotesquely irresponsible.


And I don't think it is fair to say what they gave them. You don't know what they gave them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom