a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
When a group has a track record of lying, an incentive to lie, and suffer nothing for getting caught lying, well, yes.
Here's a BBC transcript
http://www.electronicintifada.net/v2/article1667.shtml
Olenka Frenkiel, a BBC journalist, stated that "In February 2001, a new gas was used in Gaza. A hundred and eighty patients were admitted to hospitals with severe convulsions." Her source appears to be Dr Mohammed Salama.
Apparently Arafat got in on the fun too:
http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/meast/02/15/arafat.gas/
You can find lots of testimony here.
The only problem? It was just tear gas.
The IDF lies too, that's there job, it's called propaganda, it's a part of every war.
In its March, 2003 special report, Israel's Secret Weapon, BBC Television reviewed this series of gas attacks, noting, "The Israeli army has used new unidentified weapons. In February 2001 a new gas was used in Gaza. A hundred and eighty patients were admitted to hospitals with severe convulsions. … Israel is outside chemical and biological weapons treaties and still refuses to say what the new gas was."
In my amateur analysis of the reported comments of victims, eyewitnesses and medical professionals regarding this series of attacks, I identified thirty-three distinct symptoms attributed to the unidentified gas. All but three of these symptoms appear to be typical of nerve gas poisoning. Tareg Bey, a chemical warfare expert at the University of California-Irvine, told the Chicago Reader that the symptoms described to him "all fit really well to nerve gas," though he was puzzled by the reported fragrance and skin rashes.
The IDF could tell us what the gas was and clear up the matter. That hasn't happened. According to the witnesses, they know what tear gas is, and the effects described don't sound like tear gas.
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/brooks.php?articleid=2957