Lucianarchy and remote viewing

traveller said:


Maybe you should consider a exciting new career as a "all remote viewing hits are coincidences laboratorist" where you will work around the clock using highly scientific experiments to prove this.:crazy:
Click to expand...

[QUOTE}Originally posted by traveller
You should consider a exciting new career as a "everything paranormal which is outside of my personal beliefs is Pseudoscientific mumbo-jumbo laboratorist". You can spend your time conducting controlled scientific experiment to prove your views! :crazy:
This is the second post of your's that I've read, and you said the same thing to someone else. Maybe you should consider a career in the Department of Redundancy Department.
Click to expand...
 
traveller said:


Maybe you should consider a exciting new career as a "all remote viewing hits are coincidences laboratorist" where you will work around the clock using highly scientific experiments to prove this.:crazy:
Click to expand...

Maybe you should consider getting a brain.
 
Originally posted by BNiles
This is the second post of your's that I've read, and you said the same thing to someone else. Maybe you should consider a career in the Department of Redundancy Department.
Click to expand...


I have a fan who reads all my posts!

Maybe you should consider getting a brain.
Click to expand...

winprizedowns.jpg
 
traveller said:


Maybe you should consider a exciting new career as a "all remote viewing hits are coincidences laboratorist" where you will work around the clock using highly scientific experiments to prove this.:crazy:
Click to expand...

Maybe you should find one case of "RV" that isn't coincidence or outright cheating. Just one, irrefutable case will be fine.
 
traveller said:


Maybe you should consider a exciting new career as a "all remote viewing hits are coincidences laboratorist" where you will work around the clock using highly scientific experiments to prove this.:crazy:
Click to expand...

As I've already said, we have only one example. Impossible to distinguish from a lucky hit. Even if it were labeled as a prediction (Which this one was not) and more specific. (Which this one was not)

I'm waiting to see if Luci can duplicate the supposed feat. I realize he/she might not be able to do it on command, so I'm patient, but this definitley goes in the 'unimpressive' file so far.
 
Lucianarchy said:
Luck? Make my day..


There has been *plenty* of evidence for the existence of the psi effect. If presented in a court of law, the evidence , in total, would not all, each, and every account, be dismissed as being either fraud, error or delusion. It has been proven to exist beyond all reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...


There has never been any evidence of Psi that withstood REAL skeptical scrutiny. Both the quality AND quantity would be laughed out of any court.

My own experiences, including the 'ladybrook' perception have provided me with self evidence. I can tell you the effect exists. If you want to call it luck, so be it, maybe that's why so many butterflies settle on me. I can also tell you that, like a butterfly, the effect evidently makes its *own* choice where it settles.
Click to expand...

Self evidence is fine and good. Just don't come to some message board on the internet and expect everyone to take such claims seriously.

I can say that I have a giant martian death machine in my garage. It might be true. It might not. How does that stack up to your self evidence claim?
 
Yes, I agree that luck is one possibility. But without offending Lucianarchy's sensibilities, I'm sure she would agree that a trick would have to be considered.

If some computer expert here could duplicate the process, then it would be most likely that it was done that way.

It seems to me that if fraud could be ruled out and the timestamp could not be tampered with, this would be an interesting method for psychics and the like to post their predictions in a thread to see how accurate they turn out to be.

Plus, nobody has addressed the insider information possibility and the connection with Christine, I think it was, who might have got a call from someone who noticed a lot of police activity in her street in Ladybrook. Christine then phones Lucianarchy.

Then with the 'clock' problems on the site, it was made to look like a prediction.

I still think it looks like an add-on after the event. Although why not say 'I predict something is going to happen in Ladybrook'? It seems the energies or spirits or whatever suffer from a tragic lack of specificity, and have very poor 'connections'. Would that be the ETHERnet? :) They are also so often dyslexic and interested in only the most trivial things.

I hope when I'm dead and having a discussion with Socrates, he has more to talk about than how bitter the hemlock tasted and how he's glad somebody is looking after his cat.

Or is the secret of the 'higher planes' simply 'trivia in life, trivia in death.'

malc:)
 
traveller said:


You would have to find a "RV case finder without outright cheating for angry skeptic who won't like it laboratorist".
:crazy:

Click to expand...

So far every post you've made on this board has been about as thoughtful as "Neener Neener!"
 
The Ladybrook thing...

and other stuff like it. Now suppose this sort of phenomena were demonstratably true. Now what intermediary entity or consciouness would it be that sorts through all the available data in the universe in order to present the "significant" bits to the perceiver? and what criteria does this editor use to decide which bits of information is significant? Does it say to itself "Well, this bit of information (obscurely presented) will be meaningful to this particular set of the world population? Would a Pygmie RV'er have also received this "Ladybrook" bit of useless information even though it would be utterly insignificant to him (and I'm not convinced it is actually significant to anybody.)? Or would a Pygmie see'er instead have been receiving bits of information such as "elephant" or "hyiena". Make no mistake, I consider the whole deal to be total horsesh*t, but I am wondering what the theory would be on how the information selection process occurs.
 
Who was that....

famous theologian or Christian person who when asked if they were given the choice between God and the truth said they would choose God? Unfortunately, that is the mentality you are dealing with in most believers in almost anything.
 
My bad for replying to you, traveller. I had to give you the benefit of the doubt though. Have a good life.
 
traveller said:


I exposed the truth behind yellow bamboo!
http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?threadid=27750

I figured out why atheists are atheists!
http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?threadid=27698&pagenumber=3
Click to expand...


Your arguements have been proven fallicious or outright fabrications, plus you simply poke fun at those arguements you can't understand. When you gain intelligence, come on back, troll. If people really had superpowers, they would simply pass every verifying test thrown their way.
 
thaiboxerken said:


Your arguements have been proven fallicious or outright fabrications, plus you simply poke fun at those arguements you can't understand. When you gain intelligence, come on back, troll. If people really had superpowers, they would simply pass every verifying test thrown their way.
Click to expand...

lolgorilla.jpg


Where have they been proven fallicious smartguy?
 
vivid dream

Although I'm a sceptic, I've just had a vivid dream at around 2.15am BST. Monday Oct 6. I'm still sleepy and woozy but can recall:

young teen with grandmother
airplane, Austria/Switzerland, snow on mountains
short flight
hijack
guns hidden in seats
military jets escort
large 'model' plane
car in carpark
only paid one day parking

probably just what it was -- a vivid and disturbing dream.

malc
 
Right -- now i see how this kind of thing works.

I was too specific with my details.

I was surprised that within two days of my post, Fox News reported that there had been a BUS HIJACKING in Austria, by a guy who said he had explosives.

A very weak hit for Austria and hijack.

Had I just said 'I predict there will be a hijacking in Austria -- mountains and snow (irrelevant, really) it would have looked quite impressive.

Maybe I should go in to the 'psychic' business:roll:

malc
 
How telling that none of the pseudo-skeptic can agree on a rational explanation.

Can anyone explain why there has been so much rudeness directed towards me though?

This thing happened the way I said it. It doesn't matter whether you believe it or not, it happened. The best you can call it is 'Luck'. For me ( and TB Ken ), it was more proof positive. For Ken, it may be a way forward for him to begin to listen to the whispers in his life.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom