Lucianarchy and remote viewing

Lucianarchy said:


Yes. 'Luck' is simply not a rational or plausible explanation for what has happened.


Yes it is.

This was a terrorist attack (not a leaflet drop some weeks after the "psychic vision").


A failed terrorist attack. How many terrorist attacks, both sucessful and failed, happen every day?

The terrorists used a hijacked bus packed with explosives driven through a residential area.

They passed through Ladybrooke. It was neither their starting point nor target.

It happened within a very short time of my recording the 'ladybrook' perception here, in this very thread, a thread taunting my remote viewing ability.

You did nothing of the sort. You did not point out that the word ladybrook was a perception. You made no attempt to draw attention to the word at all. If this had been a converstaion, that would have been a muffled sneeze.
And one word is hardly a remote viewing. Unless you want to broaden the definition to include anything, and therefore nothing.
 
Yes. 'Luck' is simply not a rational or plausible explanation for what has happened.

Lucianarchy - first of all, stop magnifying the scope of the event in Ladybrook - it didn't even make the news here in the US. And I will have to say, that this thread is indeed a testament to your remote viewing ability. Next time though, don't just post a word hidden at the end of a post, give the town who is going to have a news event pass through a call so they can clear the streets.

Here is a list of some events since your post that you had no psychic vision of:

Bob Hope dies
Pizza Man has head blown off
3000 dead in France of heat wave
Computer virus reaks havoc
Liberian President Charles Taylor stands down

Any reason you can think of that you were unable to remote view these? Or can you only remote view on the places these news events may have passes through?
 
A man has been charged by police in Northern Ireland with conspiracy to cause an explosion in connection with the Omagh bombing.

The man was also facing charges of possessing explosive substances with intent to endanger life and membership of a proscribed organisation.

He was arrested early on Tuesday morning in a major security operation in south Armagh near the border with the Irish Republic.

The man, believed to be 34-years-old, is due to appear at Craigavon Magistrates Court on Saturday. He had been questioned in Gough Barracks in the city of Armagh.

The Omagh bombing, which killed 29 people including a mother of unborn twins and injured more than 200, was the worst atrocity in the history of terrorist attacks in Northern Ireland.

The Real IRA claimed responsibility, but only one person has been convicted in connection with the bombing - publican Colm Murphy, who received 14 years in the Special Criminal Court in Dublin for helping to plot the attack.

Last month, Michael McKevitt was also convicted of directing terrorism in the Irish Republic. However, he has not been convicted directly of involvement in the attack.

A civil action has been launched by some of the relatives of those killed in Omagh against five dissident republicans, who they believe were responsible for the bombing.

McKevitt and Murphy were among the five people named on writs for the civil action.

Has anyone spotted any Lucianarchy predictions about this lately? She/he/it seems to be attuned to Northern Ireland problems. Has anyone spotted the words Dublin, Craigavon, Omagh, Armagh, Real IRA, bombing etc. appended to a post with no explanation of why it is there? I haven't.

Yours feeding the Troll,

AC.
 
Lucianarchy only posts to defend pseudoscience. Whenever you, yes YOU, spot pseudoscience, you know that Luci will be there!

Have an itch? That's your etheric body telling you to go for a pint!

Got a headache? That's your 9th chakra telling you it's Miller Time!

Heard a nonsense word? Go right ahead and post about it. When others tell you they have no idea what you're talking about, that's your cue to babble about stuff and then CUT LOOSE! FOOTLOOSE!

I'd put a pic of Kevin Bacon here, but I'm slightly drunk and have more sambuca to ingest. Hi reprise.
 
Starrman said:

And I will have to say, that this thread is indeed a testament to your remote viewing ability. Next time though, don't just post a word hidden at the end of a post, give the town who is going to have a news event pass through a call so they can clear the streets.


Unfortunately, that is not how the effect reliably works. This effect came through a perception that became self evident by being recorded within an hour before the Ladybrook terrorist attack. All recorded in a thread tauting my RV ability. Psirony. You have to be able to first be receptive to Psi in nature. Psi is like a butterfly.
 
Lucianarchy said:
Unfortunately, that is not how the effect reliably works. This effect came through a perception that became self evident by being recorded within an hour before the Ladybrook terrorist attack. All recorded in a thread tauting my RV ability. Psirony. You have to be able to first be receptive to Psi in nature. Psi is like a butterfly.
In other words the effect reliably works unreliably.
And I think you meant "touting" - "To praise highly or publicise aggressively" rather than the racetrack meanining.
Unless you can predict the results of horse reces and tout them to others.
Or perhaps you meant "trouting"?
 
Jeff Corey said:

In other words the effect reliably works unreliably.
And I think you meant "touting" - "To praise highly or publicise aggressively" rather than the racetrack meanining.
Unless you can predict the results of horse reces and tout them to others.
Or perhaps you meant "trouting"?

You may recall, Luci only does lotteries. Funny it hasn't retired yet:D
 
Lucianarchy said:


Unfortunately, that is not how the effect reliably works. This effect came through a perception that became self evident by being recorded within an hour before the Ladybrook terrorist attack. All recorded in a thread tauting my RV ability. Psirony. You have to be able to first be receptive to Psi in nature. Psi is like a butterfly.

Even if your Psirony were true (which is highly unlikely) it means your 'powers' are useless except for message board tricks. Tricks indistinguishable from lucky guesses and coincidence.
 
Ratman_tf said:


Even if your Psirony were true (which is highly unlikely) it means your 'powers' are useless except for message board tricks. Tricks indistinguishable from lucky guesses and coincidence.

Not so. There have been numerous, desperate attempts to reproduce such "guess" or "coincidence" by other forum members. None of them came even remotely (sic) close. My recorded perception was qualified not only in magnitude, but by time. My perception was qualified within an hour or so if its recording here.

Any claim for "guess" or "coincidence" for the 'ladybrook' perception is extraordinarily unlikely.

Feel free to call it what you want, but it was, in fact, a psychic perception, qualified and recorded right here on the JREF Forums. Perhaps someone has got some 'crow' indegestion tablets they could lend you. I think TBK has eaten most of them though.
 
Lucianarchy said:


Not so. There have been numerous, desperate attempts to reproduce such "guess" or "coincidence" by other forum members. None of them came even remotely (sic) close.

Not so. Many made predictions that gave the appearance of coming true. You seem to have latched onto the FAILED terrorist attack as some kind of measure of how 'important' the event was. But as I have tried to tell you, terrorist attacks happen all the time.

My recorded perception was qualified not only in magnitude, but by time. My perception was qualified within an hour or so if its recording here.

It was not a perception. It was a single word at the end of one of your posts. You didn't even note that it was a perception. Not a hint or a whisper that it might be ANYTHING interesting at all. In order to be recorded as a perception, you should have noted that it was. Either that, or you were just dropping a word and hoping for a lucky hit.

Any claim for "guess" or "coincidence" for the 'ladybrook' perception is extraordinarily unlikely.


Your assertation. I do not agree.

If you had done this before, or could do it again, I might consider it a bit more than coincidence. But your 'Psirony' gives you the perfect excuse to not reproduce it. Good job of covering yourself.

Feel free to call it what you want, but it was, in fact, a psychic perception, qualified and recorded right here on the JREF Forums. Perhaps someone has got some 'crow' indegestion tablets they could lend you. I think TBK has eaten most of them though.

No thanks. I stand by my evaluation of your so-called 'perception'.
 
Ratman_tf said:

You seem to have latched onto the FAILED terrorist attack as some kind of measure of how 'important' the event was. But as I have tried to tell you, terrorist attacks happen all the time.


Now you are simply plain lying.:rolleyes:

I expect as much, it goes with the territory.

However, the attack was very real, a bus packed with explosives, driven through a residential area. The fact that it failed to explode is a testament to the nature of Psirony in this thread. If it had, I would, no doubt, have been labelled a 'ghoul'. :rolleyes: Given your response, we both know the reality of what happened here, it's just that you are being dishonest with yourself. That, my friend, is only a problem for you, not me.
 
Lucianarchy said:


Now you are simply plain lying.:rolleyes:

I expect as much, it goes with the territory.


Excellent. Perhaps now you will elaborate on the research you were conducting. Also, how do you calculate the probability of randomly choosing a three digit number? I think that our newer posters should get a solid lesson in innumeracy.
 
Lucianarchy said:


Now you are simply plain lying.:rolleyes:

I expect as much, it goes with the territory.

Lying about what? Terrorist attacks happening frequently?

Given your response, we both know the reality of what happened here, it's just that you are being dishonest with yourself. That, my friend, is only a problem for you, not me.

You go ahead and keep telling yourself that. I'm sure it's easier than facing the truth.
 
Sorry to come so late to the party, but has anyone raised the question of inside knowledge here?

In other threads Luci has claimed this....


But let me tell you this, sonny, not only have I spent over 12 years working for the Home Office assessing criminal cases, interviewing suspects, offenders and victims, in custody suites and on the streets and homes where these people live, actually *being* an expert witness, with thousands of hours of Crown Court work. Not only that, I have worked *alongside* hundreds of police officers, worked in over thirty different police stations, from all over the country, on all sorts of criminal cases, from all areas of specialism. (from Page 5 of the 'Police and Psychics' thread.)

So even if, and I don't see that this is proven, even if the 'ladybrook' posting was made before the incident became public knowledge, is it not possible that Luci got a tip off from one of her contacts?
 
RonSceptic said:
Sorry to come so late to the party, but has anyone raised the question of inside knowledge here?

In other threads Luci has claimed this....


But let me tell you this, sonny, not only have I spent over 12 years working for the Home Office assessing criminal cases, interviewing suspects, offenders and victims, in custody suites and on the streets and homes where these people live, actually *being* an expert witness, with thousands of hours of Crown Court work. Not only that, I have worked *alongside* hundreds of police officers, worked in over thirty different police stations, from all over the country, on all sorts of criminal cases, from all areas of specialism. (from Page 5 of the 'Police and Psychics' thread.)

So even if, and I don't see that this is proven, even if the 'ladybrook' posting was made before the incident became public knowledge, is it not possible that Luci got a tip off from one of her contacts?

Please. This is the internet. You don't take these prattlings seriously, do you?
 
Ed said:


Please. This is the internet. You don't take these prattlings seriously, do you?

Good heavens! You're not suggesting that what Luci posted isn't true?? Surely not?

Crickey.:eek:
 
RonSceptic said:


Good heavens! You're not suggesting that what Luci posted isn't true?? Surely not?

Crickey.:eek:

[generic, lovable, english country dialect]

Ah, me son, I can see that yer Mum and Dad left a few things out of yer ed-u-cation.

(puts arm around callow youth, directs him to pub)

Ya see, son, it began years ago. We had what ya call naughts. Well, them camel jocky guys gaave us that a powerful long time ago and we did 'em one better. Ones they wuz. Yup. Zeds and ones and that's how it started.

(enters pub, callow youth takes in all wide eyed)

Now, to make this all sensible like to ya we gotta talk silicon. Noooo, not silicone ya twit, thats fer titties. Silicon boy, listen up. Where was I? Oh, yeah. So, 2 billion years ago, or was it 3? No matter ..........................

(long droning as only the aged can accomplish)
 

Back
Top Bottom