Lucianarchy and remote viewing

Lucianarchy:

I don't know how many times I have to reiterate this. In fact, it's becoming tiresome.

YOU MADE NO PREDICTION.

You typed one word at the end of a post, with no explanation for it.

THIS IS NOT A PREDICTION. It's just a typing of a word.

Please stop this utter nonsense. Unless you like looking like a total idiot? Is that why you post here?

I'm starting to think so.
 
buki said:
Lucianarchy:

I don't know how many times I have to reiterate this. In fact, it's becoming tiresome.

YOU MADE NO PREDICTION.


You don't "have" to reiterate anything. My ladybrook perception, the way it came to me, the way I relate to the effect, all these things I have explained.

All that the dishonest dozen have done is accuse me of being a terrorist, having inside knowledge better than the police or media :rolleyes: , cheating somehow using an unknown and unspecified secret technique:rolleyes: or that I am indeed, very, very lucky.

All we see now are personal attacks and completely unfounded wishful accusations. That, alone, should tell you more about the state of skepticism here than anything else.

The effect is real. The links to the people, the labs and the science has been provided. The SAIC experiments have been replicated, as per Hyman's request after finding no suitable candidate for error or flaw. The peer reviewed document concerning these replications was posted in the 'Dr Honorton' thread. It was immediately censored by Claus Larsen with the help of admin. What does that tell you? Go figure...

The effect is real. Rethink, be skeptical of what you have been lead to believe from so called 'skeptics' and be prepared for a shift in your own consciousness. Or live the rest of your life to the dictate of those who will happily raise you like mushrooms. And finally, here's something you may not want to see; the 'psi' effects can only be developed if you are a true, honest to yourself skeptic.
 
Lucianarchy,

You are one pathetic liar.

Have you never wondered why nobody here supports anything you say?
 
CFLarsen said:
Lucianarchy,

You are one pathetic liar.

:rolleyes: All we see now are personal attacks and completely unfounded wishful accusations. That, alone, should tell you more about the state of skepticism here than anything else.
 
Lucianarchy said:
:rolleyes: All we see now are personal attacks and completely unfounded wishful accusations. That, alone, should tell you more about the state of skepticism here than anything else.

You are a liar, Lucianarchy, and you have no support here.

If you do, let's see it.
 
CFLarsen said:

What are you talking about? I was referring to your support here.

Where is it?

"Support" is entirely irrelevant. I realise it is important for you, but that's your problem, not mine.
 
CFLarsen said:
My point.


What, exactly, is your point? And in what way does it reinforce any argument you have put forward in this thread?

No proponents of remote perception / remote viewing in the JREF crowd?

No people stepping forward to put themselves through the accusations, lies and personal attacks I have been subjected to by you and other pseudo-skeptics?

Well duh... :rolleyes:
 
Plainly stated.

I'm sorry if this offends anyone, but people who claim they have supernatural or paranormal powers are either liars or delusional. Either way they are pretty pathetic. I guess it doesn't hurt anybody if claim you have paranormal ability (with the exception of those who exploit people's gullibility for profit), but personally I am a little offended by someone who just sits there and lies to me. "I can do remote viewing." is just someone lying to you and presuming you are stupid enough to believe them. And the horsecrap about not being able to "view" into a dark tent or dark locker - could you sound anymore idiot? In as much as you are not using your eyes when "remote viewing", in as much as you are not relying on electromagnetic radiation at all to gleen your information about the object, how on friggin earth could it possibly matter whether the locker or the tent were lighted or not.

And these people have the gall to question Randi's honesty? When the whole of their argumentative energy goes into inventing plausible sounding excuses why they can NEVER do what they claim they can do. I don't know if Randi is personally a jackass or not. I don't know the man, but the fact is he doesn't have to dream up ways to thwart "paranormalists". In as much as nobody can do anything paranormal why on earth would he have to? If any paranormal ability existed at all it would have demonstrated itself credibly and convincingly to be part of our reality over the vast course of human existence. I have no respect for people who rather than argue honestly spend their energies making weaselly excuses why this ability simply can't be credibly demonstrated.
 
Plainly stated.

I'm sorry if this offends anyone, but people who claim they have supernatural or paranormal powers are either liars or delusional. Either way they are pretty pathetic. I guess it doesn't hurt anybody if claim you have paranormal ability (with the exception of those who exploit people's gullibility for profit), but personally I am a little offended by someone who just sits there and lies to me. "I can do remote viewing." is just someone lying to you and presuming you are stupid enough to believe them. And the horsecrap about not being able to "view" into a dark tent or dark locker - could you sound anymore idiot? In as much as you are not using your eyes when "remote viewing", in as much as you are not relying on electromagnetic radiation at all to gleen your information about the object, how on friggin earth could it possibly matter whether the locker or the tent were lighted or not.

And these people have the gall to question Randi's honesty? When the whole of their argumentative energy goes into inventing plausible sounding excuses why they can NEVER do what they claim they can do. I don't know if Randi is personally a jackass or not. I don't know the man, but the fact is he doesn't have to dream up ways to thwart "paranormalists". In as much as nobody can do anything paranormal why on earth would he have to? If any paranormal ability existed at all it would have demonstrated itself credibly and convincingly to be part of our reality over the vast course of human existence. I have no respect for people who rather than argue honestly spend their energies making weaselly excuses why this ability simply can't be credibly demonstrated.
 
Jackass

Lucianarchy said:


Translation: It's scared the crap out of you and made you rethink everything you have been lead to believe.

Otherwise you wouldn't have even bothered responding.

Does the expression "I am a complete jackass." have any particular meaning for you? Here it is, that long awaited compelling evidence for the existence of psychic ability!!! After all this time, all these eons, finally someone has proved its existence - and all of us were priveleged to be here to witness it! This must be one of the most momentous events in the history of civilization. Let me go and reevaluate the entire meaning of my existence.
 
Re: Re: Jackass

Lucianarchy said:


Yes, you demonstrated that quite clearly in your last post.

Hey, I AM a complete jackass about many things. One thing I don't do is pretend I have paranormal powers.
 
Lucianarchy said:


911 being drawn in the New York Lottery on the 1st anniversary of the 911 attack on New York.

That's what you think it is but then again I suppose you can invent any definition for it as you came up with the word in the first place.

Do you know what a complete idiot you appear to be with statements like this?

I'll give you a couple of clues: Utter and total.
 
I'm back after moving into my new house and I see we're still going strong, but have reverted to name calling again. :p

You don't "have" to reiterate anything. My ladybrook perception, the way it came to me, the way I relate to the effect, all these things I have explained.

Luci:

You've stated this several times throughout this thread, but I still don't see where you said "Ladybrook" was a prediction before the word had any relevance to anything. Other’s who claim psychic ability at least have the decency to state clearly and up front that they are making a prediction.

As for all the accusations imposed on you, they really only boil down to 2. Either you’re a liar or you were lucky enough to have a vague word seem relevant so quickly. My belief is the latter. Any random word can be made relevant to news around the world if given time. Your chances were made better by it being an area of known chaos and calculated risk.

I’m not considering the possibility that you are psychic in anyway because you never claimed a prediction. As I’ve stated before. If you had just said something then and maybe added some detail, I would probably be arguing for you today. As it stands, I see very little support for your claim, nor any reason for it.
Sorry :(
 

Back
Top Bottom