Lucianarchy and remote viewing

thaiboxerken said:


Not only that, but no such terrorist attack even took place.

Believers don't let such facts steer their convictions though.

:eek: Now you are just plain lying.

From the BBC report:

"Police have blamed dissident republicans for the attack which, they said, couldn't have happened at a worse time.

Children were out playing on the estate when the bus was hijacked.

Acting District Commander Peter Farrar said countless lives were put at risk.

"It was a very unstable device filled with petrol," he said.


"If this had gone off, basically the whole bus would have exploded and a large fireball would have encompassed the whole bus and anyone standing nearby. " "
 
It was a non-event. A terrorist attack was stopped. No bomb went off as planned by the terrorists.
 
TLN said:
Luci, let us know where you're ready for genuine scientific research into your powers. After all, you are a skeptic, right? You should think very highly of the scientific method, no?

Please either answer these questions or state your refusal to do do.

Ready when you are...
 
Lucianarchy said:
since you were on of the 10-12 who viewed it within minutes of my posting it

How do you know that??

Please either:
  • address the question, providing either a retraction or evidence of your claim, or
  • state that you refuse to answer.

Avoiding it like the plague....
 
Lucianarchy said:


:eek: Now you are just plain lying.

From the BBC report:

"Police have blamed dissident republicans for the attack which, they said, couldn't have happened at a worse time.

Children were out playing on the estate when the bus was hijacked.

Acting District Commander Peter Farrar said countless lives were put at risk.

"It was a very unstable device filled with petrol," he said.


"If this had gone off, basically the whole bus would have exploded and a large fireball would have encompassed the whole bus and anyone standing nearby. " "

He's just saying the attack was foiled before it could happen. Chill out.
 
Hexxenhammer said:


He's just saying the attack was foiled before it could happen. Chill out.

An attack is an attack. Just because someone doesn't kill you when they lunge at you with a knife, does not mean you weren't attacked with a knife.

In this case, gun men hijacked a bus, loaded it with explosives, had it driven through a residential area (whilst children were playing in the streets), over speed bumps ( at speed) targetting a police station.
 
Lucianarchy said:


An attack is an attack. Just because someone doesn't kill you when they lunge at you with a knife, does not mean you weren't attacked with a knife.

In this case, gun men hijacked a bus, loaded it with explosives, had it driven through a residential area (whilst children were playing in the streets), over speed bumps ( at speed) targetting a police station.

No, actually, an attack is not an attack. This is a foiled terrorist attack. As opposed to a successful terrorist attack. Just like attempted murder is different from actual murder.
I notice "UN headquarters, Baghdad" didn't appear at the end of any of your latest posts. Too easy?
 
Lucianarchy said:


Interesting how your mind works. You have fallen back on calling me a "fraud", with no proof what so ever. I have explained how the effect works and the nature of its perception and relationship with consciousness. If you don't understand how lame your personal attack is, then perhaps consider why I was also unable to provide other specific detail, like peoples descriptions, bus routes, colours of the underpants of the terrorists and the name of the bus drivers first math teacher. :rolleyes: Like TBK, you are the real 'True Believers', you have some prejudiced mind-set which somehow defines 'psychic' presumably as someone with a cauldron, a black cat and the ability to change people into newts. :rolleyes:

Talk about a personal attack.
Let us not forget that you simply wrote “Ladybrook”.
I was simply pointing out that you did not say that Ladybrook would be a terrorist attack. Yet your post alluded to it as point of fact. And this “alluding” is a typical ploy used by frauds.
If the shoe fits.....
 
Lucianarchy said:


No you couldn't. The explosion took place the day before you posted about it. :rolleyes:

Actually, you're wrong. I posted the word Tulsa on the 18th (just double checked), and indeed, the explosion was on the 18th.

Now I honestly don't know the times and such, but the date is the same. And btw, I'm not claiming it's anything but a coincidence, and my point is that one event still leaves that as an option. You may not consider it possible, but I've seen some freaky coincidences in my life, so you'll pardon if I do consider it possible.

Barb
 
Lucianarchy said:


Please show where these 'dropped words' have appeared in my posts before.

If you are going down the luck route, then, frankly, you'll need plenty of it to match such a prediction, in such a context, in such a space of time to such a thing as a terrorist attack in the place named.

It doesn't matter whether they have or haven't. It happens to plenty of people so no one pays attention, and for all I know that's what really happened here, and it was all an accident that you're taking advantage of. Stranger things have happened in this life.

Which is why I suggested ... to avoid possibility of any confusion or questions in the future, that you simply include the word prediction in front of your word. Then there can be no confusion, and you strip away one argument that people could make.

As for the luck/coincidence aspect, I have no way of knowing. You clearly don't believe it is. Now if you showed a string of say ten hits with no misses, I would probably look closer, but if you showed a string of say 2 hits and 8 misses, I'd figure you were guessing.

Coincidences are unlikely events that nonetheless happen, thus hitting one end of the bell curve or the other. You've shown me nothing in the way of extended proof that this is anything else. Show me a line of events and might well become another matter entirely.

My suggestion therefore, is that you predict away, and we'll all see what happens.

Seriously, I'm ready to be convinced. Since you say this happens to you now and then, my suggestion is that you make note of it when it happens in such a way that what you meant is unquestionable during or after.

Barb
 
Lucianarchy said:

In this case, gun men hijacked a bus, loaded it with explosives, had it driven through a residential area (whilst children were playing in the streets), over speed bumps ( at speed) targetting a police station.
Woodbourne Police Station to be specific. I understand the bomb was left there. A call was made to a Belfast news room and the bomb was defused. The ladybrook connection was with the terminal where the bus started its journey.
The twin towers is famous for the twin towers. People don’t refer to where the hijackers boarded the plane. However this is a mute point.

You said
This is how RV impressions work, often nothing clear, which is all that I could pick up, a name. More precognition than RV, but RV works across time points.
. Yor predicted no hijack, No explosives, no children playing in the street, no speed bumps, no police station,. You couldn’t say if ladybrook was significant from the past , present or future. You couldn't say if it was ladybrook in Ireland or Nottingham.
Yet you now claim to have predicted a major terrorist attack. :rolleyes:
 
New test.

I just posted, edited within four minutes, waited until my post (while it was in edit) was viewed by three people, saved the edited post, and noted there was no 'edited by...' stamp.

Now, while this does not discount the 'guess' theory, it adds further weight to the proposal that Luci posted, edited the post, waited an hour (accidentally or purposefully, not speculating), noticed a news item on Ladybrooke, added the word, and reposted.

This can be done. Nobody here has claimed to have seen the post with the word in it, hence not refuting the claim.

The evidence mounts.

Athon
 
Let's see.

I'm using my own computer's clock here.

Posted at 11:05.

I immediately edited my post, keeping it open.

After 10 more page views (keeping another browser window open for this), I added this line.

Does my post show any sign of editing?
 
Yes, it does! :)

I think I know what I did "wrong". I looked at the page myself. Presumably, this triggers the "edited" thingie.

Let's keep experimenting.
 
Lucianarchy said:


Psironic karma's a reality, if you don't want to get burned, stay out of the kitchen..

Well I don't see how "Psironic" anything can be a reality as Psirony is not even a real word let alone a phenomenon.

So in light of this, what exactly is Psirony? A search on Google produces one singular website. Strangely enough it belongs to someone with the handle Luciananarchy. Nice links to a Uri Geller love fest BTW.

Oh hang-on, maybe this site belongs to another Lucianarchy who just so happens to use the non-existant word psirony as well. You will remember the "imposter" Luciananrchy popping up on the New Age Wackos board, I take it.
 
I just wanted to make sure Lucianarchy doesn't get forgotten here. So....

*Bump*
 
juninho said:


Well I don't see how "Psironic" anything can be a reality as Psirony is not even a real word let alone a phenomenon.

So in light of this, what exactly is Psirony?

911 being drawn in the New York Lottery on the 1st anniversary of the 911 attack on New York.
 
Lucianarchy said:


911 being drawn in the New York Lottery on the 1st anniversary of the 911 attack on New York.

In Lucky's world, there is no such thing as coincidence.
 
Lucianarchy said:


911 being drawn in the New York Lottery on the 1st anniversary of the 911 attack on New York.

Luci, are you one of those people who freak out when they buy something at the store and get a total of $6.66? When I worked at 7-11 I really had to fight hard to keep from laughing at those people, because it came up at least once a month for somebody.

Beware Satan's snack food.
 

Back
Top Bottom