Lucianarchy and remote viewing

[thaiboxerken]

The reason TBK is not going to support the completely unsupported claim of cheating, is that he saw, along with about a dozen others who also remain silent, the post at the time it was posted.

Is that what you are getting with your telekinetic RV powers? Well, that's not the reason, I simply don't think cheating is necessary to make non-predictions. I honestly don't remember if I saw "ladybrook" or not.


If the claim is that you can edit as long as no one 'sees the thread' , then show the proof, where is the source for this claim.

It's been shown to be true that one can edit a post as long as no person reads it.


Such desperate tactics I have not seen for a long time.

They aren't desperate tactics, they are reasoned and well thought out explanations for your trick. I don't agree with them that you must've cheated, but I do agree that you did not show RV powers in any way, shape or form.


TBK and others know damn well the post was original and unedited and posted before the event took place.

Actually, I don't. Are you claiming to read my mind now? I don't remember if "ladybrook" was in the original post or not. I certainly don't remember seeing it. This could be because the word was insignificant at the time, or you placed it there after seeing something on the news about ladybrook.


Was I supposed to be waiting for a post about me and RV to come along, gambling that no one would view my first post, somehow get intelligence before the police and media, and hope to get it edited, undetected, unrecorded and unseen minutes before Corbin posted?

The possibility of you cheating in this case is very real and probable.

I don't know which is 'luckier', guessing 'ladybrook' would become a major terrorist attack within an hour or so of my prediction, or hoping all the factors above would come together and find some secret way of editing a post without anyone detecting it or recording it, all dujring a busy time of the forum and when at *least* 10-12 people viewed the thread between my posting and Corbin's.



You didn't guess that ladybrook would become a major terrorist attack, did you? All you did was type ONE word that could fit into many, many situations.

So, you either cheated or you guessed, either way, you have given NO evidence of having superpowers.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Is that what you are getting with your telekinetic RV powers? Well, that's not the reason, I simply don't think cheating is necessary to make non-predictions. I honestly don't remember if I saw "ladybrook" or not.

The you are unobservant and since you were on of the 10-12 who viewed it within minutes of my posting it, then even according to the completely unsubstatiated claim of being able to edit up until the point it is viewed, any editing after your view would have been recorded.

All you've got is wishfull thinking, a desperate, straw clinging grasp at 'luck'.

 

[CFLarsen]

since you were on of the 10-12 who viewed it within minutes of my posting it

How do you know that??

 

[thaiboxerken]

The you are unobservant and since you were on of the 10-12 who viewed it within minutes of my posting it, then even according to the completely unsubstatiated claim of being able to edit up until the point it is viewed, any editing after your view would have been recorded.

Could be. It's easy to overlook one word that is insignificant to the post or thread at the time. But, you were counting on that, wheren't you? If nothing happened, no one would care.


All you've got is wishfull thinking, a desperate, straw clinging grasp at 'luck'.

Not even luck, there is no luck involved with typing one word that could, or could not be significant. One word is not a prediction, Lucky, you did not predict a damn thing. All you did was type a word.

This is a test to see how long I can go without having an "editted" message at the bottom.


That's a particularly stupid thing to say. If nothing happened you could bet your bottom dollar that Liarson, you, or any of the other pseudo-skeptic cynics would have ceased on it is an example of my *not* remote viewing.


You are the one that seems desperate to prove to the skeptics in here that you really do have superpowers. You should be talking to a shrink.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Could be. It's easy to overlook one word that is insignificant to the post or thread at the time. But, you were counting on that, wheren't you? If nothing happened, no one would care.

That's a particularly stupid thing to say. If nothing happened you could bet your bottom dollar that Liarson, you, or any of the other pseudo-skeptic cynics would have seized on it is an example of my *not* remote viewing. By now you'd be badgering '*why* did you mention Ladybrook in your first post in the thread about your RV ability, Lucianarchy, nothing happened, were you hoping for a lucky hit?'

TBK, I have explained how I perceive and work with the natutre of the effect. I have given you an example right here in the thread which *you* initiated about it. I know it burns you beyond the third degree. Psironic karma's a reality, if you don't want to get burned, stay out of the kitchen..

 

[TLN]

Luci, let us know where you're ready for genuine scientific research into your powers. After all, you are a skeptic, right? You should think very highly of the scientific method, no?

Please either answer these questions or state your refusal to do do.

 

[thaiboxerken]

That's a particularly stupid thing to say. If nothing happened you could bet your bottom dollar that Liarson, you, or any of the other pseudo-skeptic cynics would have seized on it is an example of my *not* remote viewing.

Hardly, the word was so insignificant that even you, yourself admitted to forgetting about it. No one asked what that word was about until you brought it up again the next day. It's a fact that insignificant things are quickly overlooked or forgotten by most people. You didn't claim to be remote viewing "ladybrook" at the time, you only posted a word. A word that was insignificant at the time.


By now you'd be badgering '*why* did you mention Ladybrook in your first post inthe thread about your RV ability, Lucianarchy, nothing happened, were you hoping for a lucky hit?'

Oh, I would've suddenly remembered a word that you, yourself forgot about until you saw a news article? You are really stupid.


TBK, I have explained how I perceive and work with the natutre of the effect.

Yes, and it's a BS claim. You have made your position unfalsifiable.


I have given you an example right here in the thread which *you* initiated about it. I know it burns you beyond the third degree. Psironic karma's a reality, if you don't want to get burned, stay out of the kithcen.

Again, you have placed yourself in an unfalsifiable and safe place for all but the intelligent. No one noticed "ladybrook" until you pointed it out the next day.

I understand though, you have such a desperate need to be different that you absolutely will not stop until you convince people that you have superpowers. I think this is something you need to work out with your local therapist.

 

[CFLarsen]

since you were on of the 10-12 who viewed it within minutes of my posting it

How do you know that??

Please either:

• address the question, providing either a retraction or evidence of your claim, or
• state that you refuse to answer.

 

[Lucianarchy]

No one asked what that word was about until you brought it up again the next day.

You can be sure that the pseudo-skeptics, in particular, Liarson, 'The Queen of The Pedants', would have soon picked up on the Ladybrook prediction in my opening post, the 2nd post in the thread, in response to your opening post about my Rv ability if nothing happened with a few days. Under the circumstances / title of the thread they would have been incredibly stupid not to have done so.

 

[thaiboxerken]

You can be sure that the pseudo-skeptics, in particular, Liarson, 'The Queen of The Pedants', would have soon picked up on the Ladybrook prediction in my opening post, the 2nd post in the thread, in response to your opening post about my Rv ability if nothing happened with a few days. Under the circumstances / title of the thread they would have been incredibly stupid not to have done so.

No, we can't be sure of that, ESPECIALLY since NO ONE even mentioned the word "ladybrook" until you brought it up the next day. Many people read the posts, you claim it yourself, and yet not one person asked what "ladybrook" was all about. Come on, Lucky, give it up.. you aren't going to convince anyone that you have superpowers.

Go seek therapy before you become dangerous to society.

 

[PinkRabbit]

You can be sure that the pseudo-skeptics, in particular, Liarson, 'The Queen of The Pedants', would have soon picked up on the Ladybrook prediction in my opening post, the 2nd post in the thread, in response to your opening post about my Rv ability if nothing happened with a few days. Under the circumstances / title of the thread they would have been incredibly stupid not to have done so.

But it wasn't a prediction---at least not as far as one could tell. It was simply a single word.

And that word could have been an accident, a dropped word, the beginnings of another sentence you deleted and missed a bit of. Oddball bits of written flotsam show up in venues like this all the time, and no one pays much attention to them.

Hence you had tons of plausible deniability. If something happened, great, you get credit. If not, well, nobody notices. One could argue that dropping "predictions" in this manner is a no lose technique.

However, in the interests of your efforts to prove your point, my suggestion, whenever you're going to make predictions, mark them as such.

IE--- Prediction: Ladybrook

This will give you the benefit of letting people know that it's a prediction so that they take notice of the date and time, and also avoid this argument. After all, if you're interested in proving your point. And I'm sorry, but to me at least, you haven't at this juncture---even assuming everything is completely honest and above board, a single event like this could easily be coincidence.

Heck, I just said Tulsa in the prediction thread for no real reason other than my girlfriend was there, and a gas factory apparently blew up. It's coincidence, but I could make the same claim you are.

You need more than just a single word that could easily be overlooked if it doesn't pan out if you're going to stand behind your convictions.

Barb

 

[CFLarsen]

You can be sure that the pseudo-skeptics, in particular, Liarson, 'The Queen of The Pedants',

I'm male, and the name is "Larsen". You have yet to prove that I lie.

since you were on of the 10-12 who viewed it within minutes of my posting it

How do you know that??

Please either:

• address the question, providing either a retraction or evidence of your claim, or
• state that you refuse to answer.

I got you by the balls (of which you have none) on this one, don't I?

 

[Lucianarchy]

Heck, I just said Tulsa in the prediction thread for no real reason other than my girlfriend was there, and a gas factory apparently blew up. It's coincidence, but I could make the same claim you are.

No you couldn't. The explosion took place the day before you posted about it.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Hence you had tons of plausible deniability. If something happened, great, you get credit. If not, well, nobody notices. One could argue that dropping "predictions" in this manner is a no lose technique.

Please show where these 'dropped words' have appeared in my posts before.

If you are going down the luck route, then, frankly, you'll need plenty of it to match such a prediction, in such a context, in such a space of time to such a thing as a terrorist attack in the place named.

 

[BNiles]

I don't know which is 'luckier', guessing 'ladybrook' would become a major terrorist attack within an hour or so of my prediction, or hoping all the factors above would come together and find some secret way of editing a post without anyone detecting it or recording it, all dujring a busy time of the forum and when at *least* 10-12 people viewed the thread between my posting and Corbin's.

guessing 'ladybrook' would become a major terrorist attack

What!? how does "ladybrook" become "ladybrook will become a major terrorist attack"

This is so typical of frauds. Say something long enough and it'll become truth. You're not getting off that easy.

 

[CFLarsen]

since you were on of the 10-12 who viewed it within minutes of my posting it

How do you know that??

Please either:

• address the question, providing either a retraction or evidence of your claim, or
• state that you refuse to answer.

Dang, you are really avoiding this, aren't you??

Keep it up, guys. Lucianarchy must not get away with this.

 

[thaiboxerken]

guessing 'ladybrook' would become a major terrorist attack

What!? how does "ladybrook" become "ladybrook will become a major terrorist attack"

This is so typical of frauds. Say something long enough and it'll become truth. You're not getting off that easy.

Not only that, but no such terrorist attack even took place.

Believers don't let such facts steer their convictions though.

 

[Lucianarchy]

guessing 'ladybrook' would become a major terrorist attack

What!? how does "ladybrook" become "ladybrook will become a major terrorist attack"

This is so typical of frauds. Say something long enough and it'll become truth. You're not getting off that easy.

Interesting how your mind works. You have fallen back on calling me a "fraud", with no proof what so ever. I have explained how the effect works and the nature of its perception and relationship with consciousness. If you don't understand how lame your personal attack is, then perhaps consider why I was also unable to provide other specific detail, like peoples descriptions, bus routes, colours of the underpants of the terrorists and the name of the bus drivers first math teacher. Like TBK, you are the real 'True Believers', you have some prejudiced mind-set which somehow defines 'psychic' presumably as someone with a cauldron, a black cat and the ability to change people into newts.

 

[thaiboxerken]

Interesting how your mind works. You have fallen back on calling me a "fraud", with no proof what so ever. I have explained how the effect works and the nature of its perception and relationship with consciousness.

It's all BS Lucky, you really should seek a therapist. Yours is the mind that's not quite working right here. If you don't believe me, go explain to a therapist the whole situation here.

Oh, and he didn't call you a fraud, he simply said that's how a fraud works. But, I'll do it.. You are full of crap.

 

[thaiboxerken]

If you don't understand how lame your personal attack is, then perhaps consider why I was also unable to provide other specific detail, like peoples descriptions, bus routes, colours of the underpants of the terrorists and the name of the bus drivers first math teacher.

You also failed to provide whether or not "ladybrook" was a person, place or thing as well as when something would happen or what might happen. You simply provided a word, not even a name, but a word.