Lucianarchy and remote viewing

[asthmatic camel]

But it was Ladybrook, hardly known in comparison to those places, and it was within an hour and a half of the perception being recorded here.

I've heard of Ladybrook and suspect that many others in Britain have too. I don't know what sources of information are available to you but I do know that when I was involved in foreign exchange dealing I had access to the latest reports from around the world hours before the general public.

Considering the posts questioning the reliability of the JREF clock and your lack of specific information regarding the Ladybrook incident, it is hardly surprising that people are less than overwhelmed by your predictive abilities.

My book is still available for remote viewing.

Regards,

AC.

 

[juninho]

I've heard of Ladybrook and suspect that many others in Britain have too. I don't know what sources of information are available to you but I do know that when I was involved in foreign exchange dealing I had access to the latest reports from around the world hours before the general public.

Considering the posts questioning the reliability of the JREF clock and your lack of specific information regarding the Ladybrook incident, it is hardly surprising that people are less than overwhelmed by your predictive abilities.

My book is still available for remote viewing.

Regards,

AC.

I don't really want to breath life into this knackered vulture, but I notice from Lucainarchy's description of her/himself that she is a Journalist. Perhaps, therefore, she may be a bit privvy to information/situations that the general public are unaware of. If you believe she didn't cheat, of course.

 

[Lucianarchy]

'ladybrook' was a genuine 'psychic' impression. Sorry about that, but that's the way it is. You can believe it or not, it makes no difference to me becasue it genuinely happened anyway. For me, it confirmed the the 'true unbeliever' psychological denial mind set of pseudo skeptics, because it was not a third party they were trying to debunk this time, 'it' - the Ladybrook terrorist attack - happened. Within an an hour or so of its time-stamped recording here.

 

[CFLarsen]

'ladybrook' was a genuine 'psychic' impression. Sorry about that, but that's the way it is. You can believe it or not, it makes no difference to me becasue it genuinely happened anyway. For me, it confirmed the the 'true unbeliever' psychological denial mind set of pseudo skeptics, because it was not a third party they were trying to debunk this time, it was me, and it happened.

No, it was not a "genuine psychic impression", you dimwit. It was something you picked off some source, and posted it - the word only, with no predictions whatsoever - at the end of a post, in a thread, opened to question your psychic abilities.

Don't even begin to think you are fooling anyone else but yourself. You did not get anything psychically.

If you ever get one of these "psychic impressions", please state beforehand that it is what you think it is, instead of sneaking it into a completely unrelated post of yours.

Sheesh...I can't believe you think you are going to pull this off...you are way out of your league....

 

[Starrman]

'ladybrook' was a genuine 'psychic' impression. Sorry about that, but that's the way it is. You can believe it or not, it makes no difference to me becasue it genuinely happened anyway.

So you had a 'genuine psychic impression' and the best thing you could think of to do with it was to type one word onto the end of an unrelated post? Not even bothering to point out why you had done so? Why didn't you tell us it was a genuine psychic impression when you typed the word? Why did you wait until after something happened at Ladybrook?

it was not a third party they were trying to debunk this time, it was me, and it happened.

Well, at least you admit that we debunked you!

 

[Lucianarchy]

No, it was not a "genuine psychic impression", you dimwit. It was something you picked off some source, and posted it - the word only, with no predictions whatsoever - at the end of a post, in a thread, opened to question your psychic abilities.

If I had "picked off some source" which, don't forget, would have had to been psychic too, as I gave the impression over an hour *before* the event actualy *happened*, then why would just use "ladybrook" and not "ladybrook bus bomb" This is how most impressions come, and it illustrates how rv works. *impressions* not ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ book titles and numbers.

 

[Jeff Corey]

I love impressions.

Can you give us an impression of what a rational person would say about your claim?

 

[Rosencrantz]

If I had "picked off some source" which, don't forget, would have had to been psychic too, as I gave the impression over an hour *before* the event actualy *happened*, then why would just use "ladybrook" and not "ladybrook bus bomb" This is how most impressions come, and it illustrates how rv works. *impressions* not f*cking book titles and numbers.

If you don't want to be accused of rigging the results, then you have to be less shady about how you present them. Your example illustrates how coincidences work, too. I would be much more likely to be convinced if you could tell us your "impressions" before the events that they supposedly describe occur. If I believed in RV, I would be so angry at you for wasting such a great opportunity to provide evidence of the phenomenon. If you knew something an hour before it happened, you should have told people about it immediately, and got your prediction on record. As it is, it just looks like a poorly-executed parlor trick.

 

[Lucianarchy]

If you don't want to be accused of rigging the results, then you have to be less shady about how you present them. Your example illustrates how coincidences work, too. I would be much more likely to be convinced if you could tell us your "impressions" before the events that they supposedly describe occur. If I believed in RV, I would be so angry at you for wasting such a great opportunity to provide evidence of the phenomenon. If you knew something an hour before it happened, you should have told people about it immediately, and got your prediction on record. As it is, it just looks like a poorly-executed parlor trick.

I don't really care what you believe. It happened never the less. Impressions. I have explained how these impressions come through. The 'psi' effect is evidently elusive and tantalising in nature. This was good evidence of such. The psi effect exists. The evidence is overwhelming. Science must begin to study the mechanism and the possible relationships between space, time and mind and it is now the job of skepticism to become skeptical of the 'true unbeliever', as the evidence, in total, is beyond all reasonable doubt. If anyone is claiming every single last one of the recorded effect evideve is either self delusion, fraud or error, then they must provide rational candidates, not simply dismiss through prejudice.

 

[thaiboxerken]

I don't really care what you believe.

I think you do, otherwise you wouldn't be defending your position.

It happened never the less. Impressions.

That's what you say, I think most people didn't take it the same way. Most people just see a stray word in a post.

I have explained how these impressions come through.

Yes, after something cool happened. Next time, let us know that your word is an impression. Telling us this stray word was an impression AFTER the fact is shady.


The 'psi' effect is evidently elusive and tantalising in nature.

So elusive that it looks like coincidence.

This was good evidence of such.

Only to yourself. To everyone else, it looks like just a coincidence at best. Trickery at worst.

The psi effect exists. The evidence is overwhelming.

I doubt it.

Science must begin to study the mechanism and the possible relationships between space, time and mind and it is now the job of skepticism to become skeptical of the 'true unbeliever', as the evidence, in total, is beyond all reasonable doubt.

Then why is it that most reasonable people doubt this?

If anyone is claiming every single last one of the recorded effect evideve is either self delusion, fraud or error, then they must provide rational candidates, not simply dismiss through prejudice.

No, the evidence must stand on it's own. That's the problem, Lucky, yours doesn't and none has so far. If the evidence can't withstand scrutiny, then it is not valid evidence. Your "ladybrook" claim hasn't, and neither has any of the paranormalists claims.

 

[asthmatic camel]

If I had "picked off some source" which, don't forget, would have had to been psychic too, as I gave the impression over an hour *before* the event actualy *happened*, then why would just use "ladybrook" and not "ladybrook bus bomb" This is how most impressions come, and it illustrates how rv works. *impressions* not ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ book titles and numbers.

Not much "f*cking" use then is it ?

Regards,

AC.

 

[juninho]

Not much "f*cking" use then is it ?

Regards,

AC.

Nah, forget about the journalist claim as well. You only need to read a few of her/his posts to understand that her grasp of English is so appaling that only a yoghurt would employ her in that capacity. "Never the less" ... jeez.

 

[Rosencrantz]

I don't really care what you believe. It happened never the less.

You just keep repeating yourself, but it doesn't give you any more credibility. You don't care what I believe; I don't care what you say happened.

And you have an annoyingly long sig file.

 

[juninho]

The 'psi' effect is evidently elusive and tantalising in nature. This was good evidence of such. The psi effect exists. The evidence is overwhelming.

Let me guess, does the data speak for itself?

How on earth can you seriously state that the 'psi' effect is 'evidently elusive and tantalising in nature'? Its certainly not evident to me in anyway. Please explain in what way is it evident and in what way does it manifest itself in an elusive and tantalising way. Don't you dare mention 'ladybrook' in your response.

I wonder how you manage to tie your own shoelaces in the morning or are you not allowed them in your padded cell?

Science must begin to study the mechanism and the possible relationships between space, time and mind and it is now the job of skepticism to become skeptical of the 'true unbeliever', as the evidence, in total, is beyond all reasonable doubt. If anyone is claiming every single last one of the recorded effect evideve is either self delusion, fraud or error, then they must provide rational candidates, not simply dismiss through prejudice.

And how, would you suggest, can science possibly study the mechanisms/relationships between space, time and the mind? You might as well ask 'science' to study the relationship between parrots and light-sabres.

OK I provide YOU as a 'rational candidate' for evidence of self-delusion and fraud. Error - Interesting Ian.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Let me guess, does the data speak for itself?

How on earth can you seriously state that the 'psi' effect is 'evidently elusive and tantalising in nature'? Its certainly not evident to me in anyway. Please explain in what way is it evident and in what way does it manifest itself in an elusive and tantalising way. Don't you dare mention 'ladybrook' in your response.

[/B]

Ladybrook is one example, yes. If it is not evident to you, then that is a problem for you to solve, because its existence has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt. The evidence, in total, if presented to a Court of law, would demonstrate bard that not every single case was false.

 

[TLN]

If it is not evident to you, then that is a problem for you to solve, because its existence has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt.

To whom?

 

[Lucianarchy]

Not much "f*cking" use then is it ?

Regards,

AC.

Irrelevant. The implications for its global, sociological and cultural acceptance is bigger than anything so far in our history / evolution.

It appears to be evident that the effects do not work solely on the dependance of what we currently understand as material living consciousness. Perhaps the grown ups left the key in a place which only grown ups could reach.

 

[CFLarsen]

Irrelevant. The implications for its global, sociological and cultural acceptance is bigger than anything so far in our history / evolution.

It appears to be evident that the effects do not work solely on the dependance of what we currently understand as material living consciousness. Perhaps the grown ups left the key in a place which only grown ups could reach.

Saved for posterity.

Lucianarchy, you think that it is irrelevant that your abilities is of any use, even though "the implications for its global, sociological and cultural acceptance is bigger than anything so far in our history / evolution"?

Is there a illogical prize I can nominate this for??

 

[asthmatic camel]

Irrelevant. The implications for its global, sociological and cultural acceptance is bigger than anything so far in our history / evolution.

It appears to be evident that the effects do not work solely on the dependance of what we currently understand as material living consciousness. Perhaps the grown ups left the key in a place which only grown ups could reach.

Errr, bigger than the acceptance of agriculture, the ability to produce fire, the ability to produce metals etc. etc. ?

I think not.

Regards,

AC.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Errr, bigger than the acceptance of agriculture, the ability to produce fire, the ability to produce metals etc. etc. ?

Of course, without a doubt. The ability to transcend space and time, at will, would be a bigger step than any of the above.