• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lucianarchy and remote viewing

juninho said:
Totally out of order. Ed and Claus should know better - if you're going to make a claim we need hard (pardon the pun) evidence.

Sorry, but you are buying into Steve's lies here, I'm afraid. I have never called someone a "town whore". Steve actually taught me that term.

No, you know what my real "crime" in all this was? That I did not speak out against Ed, when he made a crack about Steve and Pam.

I honestly didn't see it when it happened, but this "non-action" apparently made Steve so pissed that he started throwing threats of lawsuits around, hitting not just me and Ed, but also other people here, guilty of the same "crime" as mine: Not speaking up against those who are nasty to poor, li'l Steve.

So, beware: If someone makes Steve mad, and you don't see it and speak out against it, Steve is calling his lawyers to hit you with a lawsuit!!

Apparently, Steve thinks that everyone in the world should direct their undivided attention to anything that happens in his life. Is it any wonder why Steve has zero credibility....?
 
CFLarsen said:
Lucianarchy,

What exactly is your claim re. "Ladybrook"?

I often write things down as they come to me, I rarely stop to review or even think about it. I was responding to TBK's taunt-thread and a powerful perception of 'ladybrook' came through, almost shouting at me so I wrote it down. It seemed important at the time, compelling even, but frankly, I forgot about it until I heard about the Ladybrook terrorist attack on Sunday morning. Usually I write things down in a diary or book, but this time, as the thread was about RV and the message seemed to be 'pushing' it's way through, I thought 'what the hey', and just let it out where it wanted to be. That nonsense about 'I am lord bible', I admit I have no idea where that came from, it seems meaningless, but I've learned to let it flow. To be honest, as a skeptic, these things still spook me a bit sometimes when they happen like that.
 
I often write things down as they come to me, I rarely stop to review or even think about it.

As has been demostrated better and more by others on this thread who offer no perternatural explanation.

How ironic that a group of skeptics is more open-minded than a "psychic."

Or is that "psyronic"?
 
CFLarsen said:


Sorry, but you are buying into Steve's lies here, I'm afraid. I have never called someone a "town whore". Steve actually taught me that term.

I think you'll find I sent it with a very heavy slice of sarcasm. Maybe its a British thing.
 

I was responding to TBK's taunt-thread and a powerful perception of 'ladybrook' came through, almost shouting at me so I wrote it down.


It was so important that you only wrote down the one word.. and then failed to mention to anyone that it was important. No, Luci, the one word guess is a dishonest tactic of unfalsifiability. It's your "prediction" without making a prediction, it's your non-commitment to actually letting others test your superpowers. Writing one word down.. if nothing happened, no one would've really noticed. If someone did notice, it was just one word so you can claim that it wasn't an important word to you and that you just wrote it down for no apparent reason.


It seemed important at the time, compelling even, but frankly, I forgot about it until I heard about the Ladybrook terrorist attack on Sunday morning.


So did everyone else, that's why the word is not important. You didn't specify it as being important until AFTER something happened. Post hoc predictions are worth NOTHING.

Usually I write things down in a diary or book, but this time, as the thread was about RV and the message seemed to be 'pushing' it's way through, I thought 'what the hey', and just let it out where it wanted to be.

Or, you just wrote the word down thining "what the hey, if something happens, I can claim a prediction. If nothing happens, no one will probably pick up on it. If someone does, it's just one word and I haven't made a prediction."

That nonsense about 'I am lord bible', I admit I have no idea where that came from, it seems meaningless, but I've learned to let it flow. To be honest, as a skeptic, these things still spook me a bit sometimes when they happen like that.

Please do not insult the skeptics here as claiming yourself to be one. You are a believer in the supernatural, and that you have superpowers yourself.
 
A Message to the Moderators

Originally posted by CFLarsen


Sorry, but you are buying into Steve's lies here, I'm afraid. I have never called someone a "town whore". Steve actually taught me that term.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Its very simple. Everytime Larsen brings up anonymous smear campaigns, lawsuits and other accusations, I will respond in detail on the background leading up to those incidents. Mr. Larsen prides himself on his memory. I pride him on his senile penchant to repeat himself for years. He calls them lies. I have the proof on file, saved as web pages from this site, that they are true. He is skating on dangerously thin ice.

If the Moderators, who are getting a copy of this, do not wish me to bring these things up they need to advise Mr. Larsen in no uncertain terms not to bring them up first as innuendos which then require a response from me.

No, Mr. Larsen did not call me a town whore. Mr. Ed Dittus applied that term to Pam Blizzard, using a euphemism for that I will not post here. This was an attempt by Larsen to divert attention from the charge and make light of it. He deliberately confuses facts.
He doesn't get away with it, however and I refuse to believe he is either that dumb or that confused. Dittus called someone else that term in the same post as the one I was slandered in. So why Larsen are you trying to confuse people here?

Yes, Prof Corey told me to die and then published my home address in the public forum with an invitation. Corey's posts were
forwarded to his dept head, the provost, the local police where he works and the head of his security dept. This was unsettling. Its not a joke, not a laughing matter to utter such a threat and then follow it up with my home address. Ed et al also published Pam's home address. I did not publish Ed's home address even though my lawyers found it when they were thinking of suing him. Corey has never apologized so this remains an open matter.
Mr. Larsen should realize that although he did not utter these threats or make these charges himself, because he constantly uses them to belittle and mislead, this too is a form of harassment which has been documented. Every post he makes with this tone and these charges is harassment.

Mr. Ed Dittus also accused me of an illicit relationship, in writing, in public with a person I have never met. This was
slanderous and caused my wife, myself and the other person
some considerable grief.

Yes, we asked James Randi and Andrew Harter (who is no longer a moderator) to remove this. Randi responded that he would have Harter do this. It was not done. Mr. Dittus has since apologized however, and the board was revamped and the
offending posts gone but retained on hard-drives privately.

So everytime Larsen brings up these innuendos, he will get the above response. Again, if the Moderators are as tired as I am of repeating and responding to these comments, they will ask Mr Larsen to cease from doing this in the future; in addition an apology would be appreciated as well.

Thank You
 
Why don't you address the discussion instead of hiding behind these tactics, Steve.

You have many threads in this forum that you left just when things got interesting.

Why not stand up, be a man, and put your thoughts out there. This "I'm gonna tell on you." tack is childish.
 
The opinions or beliefs of Larsen clones are of no concern to me.
Corbin, you seriously find Ed calling Pam a whore, someone else calling Linda moderator something worse, Corey threatening my life, Ed accusing me of cheating on my wife and publishing my home address interesting. You are pretty sick if that's the case.
 
CFLarsen said:
Lucianarchy,

So you do not claim anything paranormal???

It is certainly beyond normal to have an uncommon word running around in your mind with an urgency that compels you to record it in an opening post on a thread which was taunting my RV ability and to have that recorded word named as the place where a terrorist attack occured within an hour and a half of its recording on this forum. 'Ladybrook' is an extremely uncommon word, I have seen the other cynics and their jokes about 'new yourk, houston and grass fires, car crashes etc, but eveyone knows that ladybrook is far more uncommon than any of those places and the event, a terrorist attack far more important than grass fires and power cuts. The event also took place within a very short space of time of impression bieng recorded. This perception replicates many other instances I have experienced and together with the extraordinary experiences with Dr Steinkamp, I cannot rationaly put all this down to 'luck' or 'chance' anymore. So yes, I believe that the perception was paranormal. I have always remained skeptical though open-minded and I have no mundane explanation for what happened.
 
This perception replicates many other instances I have experienced and together with the extraordinary experiences with Dr Steinkamp, I cannot rationaly put all this down to 'luck' or 'chance' anymore. So yes, I believe that the perception was paranormal. I have always remained skeptical though open-minded and I have no mundane explanation for what happened.

But it wasn't that big of a coincidence! Do you really think that the odds of 'Ladybrook' showing up in the news at some point are that small? People have already shown you that Ladybrook has been in the news before and is a hot-spot of IRA activity.

And if it is so replicable (not sure if that's a word) why did you guffaw at the challenges of your ability on this thread? You had the chance to make us all look like fools by demonstrating your ability, but you continually fall back on stories and your one-word non prediction.

And remember, just because YOU can't explain it, does not mean that no-one can or that there isn't a more mundane explanation. The fact that you do not see it this way makes your last sentence a complete farce.
 
SteveGrenard said:
Its very simple. Everytime Larsen brings up anonymous smear campaigns, lawsuits and other accusations, I will respond in detail on the background leading up to those incidents. Mr. Larsen prides himself on his memory. I pride him on his senile penchant to repeat himself for years. He calls them lies. I have the proof on file, saved as web pages from this site, that they are true. He is skating on dangerously thin ice.

Oh, goodie! Let's see that evidence of yours, Steve!!

SteveGrenard said:
If the Moderators, who are getting a copy of this, do not wish me to bring these things up they need to advise Mr. Larsen in no uncertain terms not to bring them up first as innuendos which then require a response from me.

I wait with abated breath. I also have evidence, Steve...lots of it.

SteveGrenard said:
No, Mr. Larsen did not call me a town whore. Mr. Ed Dittus applied that term to Pam Blizzard, using a euphemism for that I will not post here.

Well, it is a bit difficult to see what you are accusing Ed of, if you won't say it....

SteveGrenard said:
This was an attempt by Larsen to divert attention from the charge and make light of it. He deliberately confuses facts.

You are most welcome to show where I "confuse" facts.

SteveGrenard said:
He doesn't get away with it, however and I refuse to believe he is either that dumb or that confused. Dittus called someone else that term in the same post as the one I was slandered in. So why Larsen are you trying to confuse people here?

Nope. Are you saying that you were not called a "town whore"? I might have misunderstood that. However, I will need to see the actual quotes about who were called a "town whore", before I admit to any misunderstanding.

SteveGrenard said:
Yes, Prof Corey told me to die and then published my home address in the public forum with an invitation. Corey's posts were forwarded to his dept head, the provost, the local police where he works and the head of his security dept. This was unsettling. Its not a joke, not a laughing matter to utter such a threat and then follow it up with my home address.

Steve, your home address is readily available on the Internet. As for Jeff Coreys "death threat", all he said was "Drop dead and die". Is that a "threat", Steve?

SteveGrenard said:
Ed et al also published Pam's home address.

...readily available on the Internet, Steve...

SteveGrenard said:
I did not publish Ed's home address even though my lawyers found it when they were thinking of suing him.

Ed's home address is readily available on the Internet, Steve...

SteveGrenard said:
Corey has never apologized so this remains an open matter.

Is it? Problem is, what DID the police say, Steve? If this is an "open" matter, and it happened months ago, why should we believe it is an "open" matter?

SteveGrenard said:
Mr. Larsen should realize that although he did not utter these threats or make these charges himself, because he constantly uses them to belittle and mislead, this too is a form of harassment which has been documented. Every post he makes with this tone and these charges is harassment.

Whoa, Steve! You threatened me with a lawsuit because I did not speak up when Ed made his joke. I still have the emails to prove it.

SteveGrenard said:
Mr. Ed Dittus also accused me of an illicit relationship, in writing, in public with a person I have never met. This was slanderous and caused my wife, myself and the other person some considerable grief.

Take that up with Ed.

SteveGrenard said:
Yes, we asked James Randi and Andrew Harter (who is no longer a moderator) to remove this. Randi responded that he would have Harter do this. It was not done. Mr. Dittus has since apologized however, and the board was revamped and the offending posts gone but retained on hard-drives privately.

Oh, yeah, probably..... :D

SteveGrenard said:
So everytime Larsen brings up these innuendos, he will get the above response. Again, if the Moderators are as tired as I am of repeating and responding to these comments, they will ask Mr Larsen to cease from doing this in the future; in addition an apology would be appreciated as well.

I don't really see any evidence in your response.

I don't know about you, Steve, but I have never heard from the moderators regarding this. Never. So I don't really understand where the "repeated" responses come in...

If, however, the moderators should contact me, I will hand over all my evidence to them. Then, they can judge for themselves.

SteveGrenard said:
The opinions or beliefs of Larsen clones are of no concern to me.
Corbin, you seriously find Ed calling Pam a whore,

Where did Ed call Pam a "whore"?

SteveGrenard said:
someone else calling Linda moderator something worse,

Who called Linda what?

SteveGrenard said:
Corey threatening my life,

No, he didn't, Steve.

SteveGrenard said:
Ed accusing me of cheating on my wife

I'm not even sure he knew you were married. Can't blame him.

SteveGrenard said:
and publishing my home address interesting.

It's not that difficult, Steve....Google is wonderful:

Staten Island University Hospital, SIUH Sleep Apnea Center - Control Room

Respiratory Therapy Societies/AARC Chapters/Related Medical Societies and Organizations
Note your email at the bottom. SIUH, where you work, Steve.

And, in the same directory:
Herpetology Books On-Line Catalogue

(......whistling)

SteveGrenard said:
You are pretty sick if that's the case.

Perhaps we could dispense with the diagnoses, Steve? As I recall, you have made some pretty nasty insinuations about me and my move back to Denmark. You want to see that again, Steve??
 
Lucianarchy,

If you cannot put all this down to "luck" or "chance", then you must be able to show us the statistics you must have kept.

Because you are not going to tell us that you haven't kept a log of these incidents, as well as performed the necessary statistical analyses......are you???
 
The opinions or beliefs of Larsen clones are of no concern to me.
Corbin, you seriously find Ed calling Pam a whore, someone else calling Linda moderator something worse, Corey threatening my life, Ed accusing me of cheating on my wife and publishing my home address interesting. You are pretty sick if that's the case.

::Laughing:: I don't have the perserverance to a be a Larsen clone.

Anyway...

The "getting interesting" part I was talking about were the recent threads about studies done in parapsychology.

Here is a great example of a thread you left when the challenge got too hot for you.

Being called a whore is one thing. Threatening to call the cops is lame, lame, lame.

You need to gather some sand if you are to be taken seriously and not cry about the slings and arrows.

If you have grievences, put up or shut up, it has nothing to do with me, except on these forums where you never seem to "put up" in regards to the science (or embarrassingly lack there of) of parapsychology.
 
Starrman said:


But it wasn't that big of a coincidence! Do you really think that the odds of 'Ladybrook' showing up in the news at some point are that small?

At some point, no. But coming up within an hour and a half of the 'ladybrook' post and being a terrorist attack, then that's extremely unlikely. And in relation to Ladybrook, I can't find anything as serious as a hijacked bus, packed with explosives, driven through a residential area, whilst many children were playing in the Saturday sunshine, aimed at a police station. Ever.
But in this case, it came within an hour and a half of it being recorded, in this forum, in an opening post in response to a taunt about my RV skills. It speaks for itself.
 
It speaks for itself.

Needless to say, most of us remain unconvinced. Getting three out of six balls on the National Lottey for three weeks running? Now that'd be good evidence, and oh so easy to prove. Wasn't that what you claimed in the lottery thread, way back when?

David
 
At some point, no. But coming up within an hour and a half of the 'ladybrook' post and being a terrorist attack, then that's extremely unlikely. And in relation to Ladybrook, I can't find anything as serious as a hijacked bus, packed with explosives, driven through a residential area, whilst many children were playing in the Saturday sunshine, aimed at a police station

BUT YOU DID NOT PREDICT ANY OF THAT!

You did not say it would happen within two hours.

You did not say it would be serious.

You did not mention a hijacked bus

You did not mention it was packed with explosives.

You did not mention where it was driven.

You said nothing about children.

You said nothing about a police station.

You didn't even point out to anyone that you had typed the damn word!
 
SteveGrenard said:
The opinions or beliefs of Larsen clones are of no concern to me.
Corbin, you seriously find Ed calling Pam a whore, someone else calling Linda moderator something worse, Corey threatening my life, Ed accusing me of cheating on my wife and publishing my home address interesting. You are pretty sick if that's the case.


What's this have to do with the discussion of paranormal or Luci's claim of having superpowers? It seems that you are a pompous ass that just wants to get all those that don't agree with you tossed in jail or worse.
 

Back
Top Bottom