Lucianarchy and remote viewing

[Lucianarchy]

Strange that you do not address my points at all.

What do you want me to address?

You've been shown that your editing nonsense, is nonsense. Talk about straw grasping. What else was there? Straw men too? I've already been accused of being a criminal suspect in the terrorist attack, so you're too late with that one.

 

[TLN]

What do you want me to address?

How about why you're not heading to Flordia to pick up your million?

 

[Lucianarchy]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/2846839.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/2826693.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/uk/northern_ireland/1969371.stm




Looks like Ladybrook is no stranger to the media.

Wow, three whole mentions in the entire BBC news archives, how many of them have ocurred after my post though? A gambling person would have picked better odds than 'ladybrook' turning up, don't you think? In fact, Tbk, I don't think you do actually think for yourself at all do you, you just react.

 

[Pyrrho]

Lucianarchy, your "hit" is explainable by coincidence. Next time, try providing some relevant details ahead of time. The single word, "ladybrook" is far too vague to count as a hit. Now, "ladybrook terror bomb" might have been regarded as more significant. As it stands, it isn't.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Lucianarchy, your "hit" is explainable by coincidence. Next time, try providing some relevant details ahead of time. The single word, "ladybrook" is far too vague to count as a hit. Now, "ladybrook terror bomb" might have been regarded as more significant. As it stands, it isn't.

Ah, right, OK. No problem. Just a coincidence for you then.

 

[TLN]

Ah, right, OK. No problem. Just a coincidence for you then.

Not just for him. And let's not forget cheating, still a very real possibility.

 

[Mike D.]

Lucianarchy, your "hit" is explainable by coincidence. Next time, try providing some relevant details ahead of time. The single word, "ladybrook" is far too vague to count as a hit. Now, "ladybrook terror bomb" might have been regarded as more significant. As it stands, it isn't.

Lucian,

Pyrrho's post above made me wonder if you feel it might be possible to develop your abilities to the point where sometime in the future you could come up with information that would totally confound the skeptics.

Mike

 

[Pyrrho]

Well, we can test my opinion that it's explainable by coincidence:

Langen, Germany.

Let's see what turns up in a couple of hours.

My time: 8:35 pm EST, USA.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Lucian,

Pyrrho's post above made me wonder if you feel it might be possible to develop your abilities to the point where sometime in the future you could come up with information that would totally confound the skeptics.

Mike

As a skeptic myself, I've asked before what evidence would satisfy some of the other skeptics. The usual response is often silly and based on an ignorance of the subject. My experience of the effect is that is that is subtle and unreliable on demand. I believe the information comes through co-operation with other living systems and is therefore not dependant on my, or anyones elses wishes alone. But since my work with Dr Steinkamp and others and by practising the methods I have learned about, the ability to experience the effect does seem to be getting more significant. As in the case being discussed.

 

[asthmatic camel]

Lucianarchy, I have a book on top of my pc tower in a well lit room. I shall leave it there for 7 days, please advise of the author's name and the title.

I can't wait to hear from you.

Regards,

AC

 

[Dogwood]

Lucianarchy,

If I may ask, how often do you have these precognitive/RVing insights? Are they with any regularity? Are they spontaneous or do you have to prepare yourself in some way? I ask only because it might be helpful in the future for you to record them here for future analysis and discussion.

 

[Mike D.]

But since my work with Dr Steinkamp and others and by practising the methods I have learned about, the ability to experience the effect does seem to be getting more significant. As in the case being discussed.

Lucianarchy,

Forgive me if you've answered this question before, but is there any site online where your work is described and discussed?

Mike

 

[Chupacabras]

And I get a hit!

As a skeptic myself, I've asked before what evidence would satisfy some of the other skeptics. The usual response is often silly and based on an ignorance of the subject...

And I have asked politely in this thread what do you need to make a test (alas, with no million bucks involved). Me and others have also pointed several times at how you avoid the substantial questions and you still give silly responses. I also clarified my comment of you being a terrorist (I would have called the police if I believed you in the first place). But instead of reasonable and complete answers, I get banged in the head!

BTW, do I get a hit? "El Piedrón" (the big rock) is also used to refer to dumb people - hard-headed people, slow to understand... Your banging must be it so, I get a hit!

Don't mix skepticism and cynicsm. Most of us here are eager to learn and honest enough to admit our mistakes, If you just would shut our mouths. Alas, to stand scrutinity requires integrity.

May the Force be with me!

 

[Hexxenhammer]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Lucianarchy

well, everyone who doubted him is gonna be awfully miffed when R'yleh rises and Cthulhu eats everyone.

HA!

 

[Ersby]

Ah, I see you've worked it out. Luci made the first post at, according to the forum 3.33 GMT+1 (BST), but it's entirely possible (as Lucian knows, despite the use of smilies) to edit a post without it being given a message, if no one's posted in the meantime and it keeps the original time of posting. So the first time we can be sure the "ladybrook" was when c0rbin quoted it at around 4.30 BST, a full hour after the event. Given that the clock is wrong, it's possible that it gave Lucian enough leeway (around twenty minutes or so) to add in the "prediction" just as the story was breaking.

Obviously Lucian knew about the editing glitch, and saw his chance on Saturday to put in a word that made it look like a prediciton. In the limited time, however, he could only chose what was - as it turned out - quite a minor story. The BBC site and the Belfast Telegraph may have covered it, but I can't find it anywhere else.

But applause for ingenuity, Lucian. Very nice trick.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Ah, I see you've worked it out. Luci made the first post at, according to the forum 3.33 GMT+1 (BST), but it's entirely possible (as Lucian knows, despite the use of smilies) to edit a post without it being given a message, if no one's posted in the meantime and it keeps the original time of posting. So the first time we can be sure the "ladybrook" was when c0rbin quoted it at around 4.30 BST, a full hour after the event. Given that the clock is wrong, it's possible that it gave Lucian enough leeway (around twenty minutes or so) to add in the "prediction" just as the story was breaking.

Obviously Lucian knew about the editing glitch, and saw his chance on Saturday to put in a word that made it look like a prediciton. In the limited time, however, he could only chose what was - as it turned out - quite a minor story. The BBC site and the Belfast Telegraph may have covered it, but I can't find it anywhere else.

But applause for ingenuity, Lucian. Very nice trick.

Um, Ersby, please show how it is possible to post and edit without it being time stamped. Call me a skeptic, but I just don't believe your story about "no one posting in the meantime" rubbish. I posted at 3.30pm. I did not edit it. Even if we take your scenario, I would have somehow had to have had access to what was going on in Belfast somehow and get the post edited (undetected) even before the police were wise to the what was going on, let alone the media! But anyway, please go ahead and demonstrate how this supposed editing can be done. There must be some quiet forums amongst all thje jref ones, go ahead and do it. Please. It's all you have to support your claim. BTW, If you think a bus hijacked by terrorists, packed with explosives, driven through a residential area and parked outside a police station is only a "minor story", then ....

 

[davidhorman]

if no one's posted in the meantime and it keeps the original time of posting

I was under the impression that you can edit the post transparently only if no-one has viewed the thread. renata did manage to edit her post after Clancie posted her post and the forum didn't add the "Edited at..." stamp, so perhaps there is also this two minute leeway. I'm not sure if renata saw Clancie's post before or after she started editing though.

The chances of testing this out are slim at best, as if any thread is going to invite views, it's one titled "Please do not read this thread" Jeff Corey tried it earlier, but I don't know if he started getting the "Edited" stamp because someone viewed the thread, or because two minutes elapsed.

Only 4 days left for Luci to make his lottery prediction!

David

 

[davidhorman]

Even if we take your scenario, I would have somehow had to have had access to what was going on in Belfast somehow and get the post edited (undetected) even before the police were wise to the what was going on

We've already seen that if you could edit your post without being detected, up until the time corbin replied (which is Ersby's scenario), then you did have time to add the word after the event.

a bus hijacked by terrorists, packed with explosives, driven through a residential area and parked outside a police station

<pedant>The bus didn't get that far - that's what the bombers wanted but the driver stopped at the end of the road.</pedant>

David

 

[Lucianarchy]

I was under the impression that you can edit the post transparently only if no-one has viewed the thread. renata did manage to edit her post after Clancie posted her post and the forum didn't add the "Edited at..." stamp, so perhaps there is also this two minute leeway. I'm not sure if renata saw Clancie's post before or after she started editing though.

The chances of testing this out are slim at best, as if any thread is going to invite views, it's one titled "Please do not read this thread" Jeff Corey tried it earlier, but I don't know if he started getting the "Edited" stamp because someone viewed the thread, or because two minutes elapsed.

I am sure someone has already confirmed that you can't edit a post an hour later without it being recorded by contacting the admin. It would be the correct and skeptical thing to do. Either they haven't, in which case they should, or they have and are not going to report the fact because it proves that I couldn't have edited an hour later without it being recorded. David, have you checked the technical capabilities with the admin yourself yet?

 

[CFLarsen]

I am sure someone has already confirmed that you can't edit a post an hour later without it being recorded by contacting the admin. It would be the correct and skeptical thing to do. Either they haven't, in which case they should, or they have and are not going to report the fact because it proves that I couldn't have edited an hour later without it being recorded. David, have you checked the technical capabilities with the admin yourself yet?

As usual, I'm way ahead of you. I did contact Jeff yesterday. He told me that it is, in fact, possible to edit your post without it showing, but he wouldn't tell me how!

However, I am very certain that I have edited e.g. the "Questions for Lucianarchy"-thread (oops, how did that get here? ) without the "Edited at.." line coming up.

So it is very possible.

There is one, crucial question I'd like you to answer, Lucianarchy: Why did you write "ladybrook" all of a sudden in a post, completely unrelated to the Ladybrook incident?

It seems very likely that the reason it appears, unrelated to the other content of your post, and not in a separate post, is because you needed the initial timestamp of the post.

You had the opportunity. You had the motive.