• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Jesus could not be the racist because He liked His enemies.
Click to expand...
But non-Jews, even not his enemies, he is recorded as addressing with contempt.

Matthew 15:21 Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon. 22 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. 23 But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. 24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. 26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs. 27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table. 28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.​

Such xenophobia is taught in the Tanakh. Why should Jesus not profess it? What does the Tanakh have to say about the people of Canaan? The Holy Book we must all learn Hebrew in order to read, you say!
 
Border Reiver said:
The basic law of contract has been set for many 1000s of years and is pretty much universal across human societies. Legal agreements or contracts require 2 things:

a. An offer;
b. Acceptance of the offer.

There is no requirement for the agreement to be written down and no requirement that the contract be approved by a third party.

Can you imagine ridiculous it would need to be to get the approval of a third party such as "ROBONOTARY" in cases such as this - "Timmy, if you rake my lawn, I will give you $5," "Sure Mrs. Jones."

Why do you dream of a fascist state where robots control most aspects of human interaction?
Click to expand...
I think that the criminal fascist states we have now even in so called developed countries.
When the state power in the hand off corporations it is the fascist state.
My New Saturday Great Union will make defascisation of Modern World.
One of the elements of this Great Social System will be the robot – judges.
Only robot – judges. can bring real equality of people before the law.
 
Nay_Sayer said:
What technical aspects? Arn't they going to be holograms? Which still won't fool anyone older than 5.

Also add Robot Notaries to the list of things doomed to fail.
Click to expand...

Oh to fool the God believers is not hard.
They are happy to delude their self in the positive sense of those words.
Long Live my Flying Temple of New Saturday!
 
Craig4 said:
What?! You mean Cosmo came up with a solution for a problem that doesn't exist?! I'm shocked, shocked I tell you.
Click to expand...

The problem of total criminals in the state power of all developed countries does not exist!?
The problem of total corruption does not exist!?
The problem of the total overwork – the main reason of Global crises with out the end does not exist!?
The problem of total fake democracy does not exist!?
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
I think that the criminal fascist states we have now even in so called developed countries.

When the state power in the hand off corporations it is the fascist state.

My New Saturday Great Union will make defascisation of Modern World.

One of the elements of this Great Social System will be the robot – judges.

Only robot – judges. can bring real equality of people before the law.
Click to expand...


How does requiring a state actor to approve all interactions between citizens, no matter how trivial, make the world less fascist?
 
Craig4 said:
I was thinking about this thread while watching a Netflix documentary on World War II. How many people are out there who would let the world burn for their own ego? Is humanity just lucky that the vast majority of people who want to destroy the world for hubris don't live in the right time, lack charisma and don't have the organizational skills? Is it just in the nature of people who have these ideas to crash and burn on their own?
Click to expand...
Your principle mistake that you think that the implementation of my project gives negative social harmony.
You can’t understand that my project brings positive social harmony.
I build the society of the Expanding Elite.
 
abaddon said:
Wrong again. European languages derive from Proto-Indo-European and do not intersect with Hebrew.
Click to expand...

Just look on the map!
India is too far from Europe.
So there is very little possibility that European languages have their roots in Sanskrit.
And there is great possibility that the European languages have their roots in the Language of Book of Books.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Just look on the map!
India is too far from Europe.
So there is very little possibility that European languages have their roots in Sanskrit.
And there is great possibility that the European languages have their roots in the Language of Book of Books.
Click to expand...
Even the most cursory examination of the Indian and European languages rukes that out as a possibility. The similarity of Sanskrit and Latin of Greek was noticed by European scholars centuries ago.

Perhaps your understanding of this comes from the ridiculous myth of the confusion of tongues at Babel. Maybe the snake told you this when you went to visit it in the Garden of Eden?
 
Craig B said:
"Most" W European languages belong to the Romance, Germanic or Celtic families, which are all quite closely related, descended from Indo European, and not at all close to the Semitic family.

The only W European language outside these families is Basque, which is an isolate having no affinity with Hebrew.

You are uttering nonsense, in the course of "Israelisation" of Christianity, Islam and Buddhism. But this project is insane, and the things you "believe" about languages is arrant nonsense. Where do you find evidence to support this belief? From your imagination; nowhere else.
Click to expand...

What you think, that the ancient Greeks and ancient Romans believed that their languages are descended from the language of India?!
No.
The Greeks wrote from right to left, because their language is derived from the Semitic languages - related with the language of the Book of Books.
The language of the Romans descended from the Greek language.
All European languages are descended in the medieval from Greek and Roman and Arab languages.
In the Middle Ages was the total anti-Semitism.
Therefore Europeans could not recognize that their languages are descended from the Semitic languages .
So they came up with a stupid theory of the origin of their languages from Sanskrit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom