• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Boris Porshnev
“About the beginning of human being history”.
From this great book I have made my hypothesizes about phenomena of language.
We have remember the first words of Bible:» In the beginning it was the Word….
Eh? The Rabbis who live in restored Israel and speak the Resurrected God language will capture you and skin you alive for saying that. It is not even in the Jewish Tanakh. It is the beginning of the Christian Gospel of John!

John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.​
 
Boris Porshnev

“About the beginning of human being history”.

From this great book I have made my hypothesizes about phenomena of language.
I don't think you have chosen a good source of inspiration.

In the 1950s Boris Fedorovich Porshnev, a soviet historian became interested in the possibility of a relict population of hominids surviving in modern times. He created a study group with several other Soviet scientists as a formal Commission of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. The study group, which became known as the Soviet Snowman Commission, was most active between 1958 and 1959, which such individuals as Tom Slick flew into Moscow to meet secretly with the group.

Boris Porshnev authored many articles on the topic and coauthored one book with Bernard Heuvelmans that was published after he passed away. Before his death he was known as one of the biggest advocates of the revolutionary, and highly controversial, theory that suggested Neanderthal Man still survives to this day, a hypothesis that is still argued by other students of hominology in Russia to this day.

Books: L'homme de Neanderthal est toujours vivant (1974)
Organizations: Soviet Snowman Commission​

So he was the Russian equivalent of a Bigfooter.

http://www.unknownexplorers.com/borisporshnev.php

ETA He WAS a Bigfooter! Here's a passage from the wiki biography of Tom Slick, mentioned in my note cited in this post.

During the 1950s, Slick was an adventurer. He turned his attention to expeditions to investigate the Loch Ness Monster, the Yeti, Bigfoot and the Trinity Alps giant salamander. Slick's interest in cryptozoology was little known until the 1989 publication of the biography Tom Slick and the Search for Yeti, by Loren Coleman. Coleman continued his study of Tom Slick in 2002 with Tom Slick: True Life Encounters in Cryptozoology. That book mentions many of Tom Slick's adventures, in politics, art, science, and cryptozoology, including his involvement with the CIA and Howard Hughes.​

At least the CIA and Howard Hughes actually existed ... unfortunately
 
Last edited:
Even though I am both, by any objective standard (and I have extensively studied Hebrew, and Aramaic, and Koine Greek), I disagree.

You are one of the very little number of people that know the language of Christ and the language of Book of Books.
Why you are opposed to give the language of Book of Book to every God believer that believe in Gog in the secular or on in the clerical form?
Why you are opposed to give the language of Christ to every Christian?
May be because you want to be in group of very few people that know those languages - some of clerical Jews?
 
I almost don't eat salt.
If you ate no salt, you would die. Very quickly. Whether you realise it or not, whatever it is you do eat contains salt.

The diminishes the sovereignty of “New Saturday Great Union” not more than the diminishes the sovereignty of EU.
Wrong. The EU does not impose improbable flying temples, crackpot diets, useless languages or any of your other fascist dictats upon it's citizens. You would do so.

You are one of the very little number of people that know the language of Christ and the language of Book of Books.
And you don't like that very much, because it imposes a level of honest representation that you would prefer to avoid.

Why you are opposed to give the language of Book of Book to every God believer that believe in Gog in the secular or on in the clerical form?
How do you propose to deal with atheists? Gong to force them to learn these useless languages anyway?

Why you are opposed to give the language of Christ to every Christian?
Now you want to impose aramaic? What of atheists, muslims, buddhists and so forth. Are you proposing to force those to learn a language or languages just because you happen to propound a fascist ideology?

May be because you want to be in group of very few people that know those languages - some of clerical Jews?
Maybe it's the twenty-first century and such superstitious nonsense like religion is best left behind in the Iron Age where it belongs.
 
The Slavs only started to exist in the ninth century because that's when they started to write in Cyrillic? They existed long before that.

The Khazars didn't convert to Turks. They were already Turks. Only one single word in Khazar writing survives and it is a Turkish word written in old Turkish runic. Most Khazar writings are in Hebrew language and script, because the Khazar rulers and many of the people adopted Judaism.

All what you say here is written in most hysterical texts.
It does not mean that they are true.
Slaves agree to recognize their roots from Vikings or from Tatars, or from Skiffs.
But they do not agree to recognize their roots from Khazar witch “writings are in Hebrew language and script, because the Khazar rulers and many of the people adopted Judaism”.
Turk languages speaking nations agree to recognize their roots from Tatars and Mongols of Genghis Khan.
But they do not agree to recognize their roots from Khazar witch “writings are in Hebrew language and script, because the Khazar rulers and many of the people adopted Judaism”.
I tell you my great historical hypothesis and conceptions and you tell me what you have read in Wiki.
 
All what you say here is written in most hysterical texts.
It does not mean that they are true.
Slaves agree to recognize their roots from Vikings or from Tatars, or from Skiffs.
But they do not agree to recognize their roots from Khazar witch “writings are in Hebrew language and script, because the Khazar rulers and many of the people adopted Judaism”.
Turk languages speaking nations agree to recognize their roots from Tatars and Mongols of Genghis Khan.
But they do not agree to recognize their roots from Khazar witch “writings are in Hebrew language and script, because the Khazar rulers and many of the people adopted Judaism”.
I tell you my great historical hypothesis and conceptions and you tell me what you have read in Wiki.
Your hypothesis and conceptions are so bizarrely wrong, why would anyone put more effort in than a quick look at wiki?

Despite that, some have made the effort to go beyond wiki and cast wider research nets. Guess what happened. You always ignored it.

Now let me reflect the question back on you. How come your ideas are so weak that even a quick wiki search can blow the out of the water? Why is that?
 
Why would the doings of the bastard son of an iron age slut be of any interest to anybody?

It is the great paradox.
Orthodoxy Jews that hate Christ have saved His Language in Talmud for last 2000 years.
It is the matter of fact.
And people who like Christ do not want to know His language because it is the language of Talmud that they hate for 2000 years.
Enough is enough!
Holy Resurrected Language to Every God Believer!
The Language of Christ to Every Christian!
 
It is the great paradox.
Orthodoxy Jews that hate Christ have saved His Language in Talmud for last 2000 years.
It is the matter of fact.
And people who like Christ do not want to know His language because it is the language of Talmud that they hate for 2000 years.
Enough is enough!
Holy Resurrected Language to Every God Believer!
The Language of Christ to Every Christian!

Jesus died because he was too crazy or too stupid to avoid being turned into performance art.
 
Utter nonsense. The first gospels were composed in Greek. The majority of early Christians were Greek speaking people, and not Aramaic speaking Jews, because the majority of Jews rejected the Messianic status, as well, of course, as the divinity, of Jesus. They never became Christians.

The Christian texts were written in Greek long before the advent of the Emperor Constantine. In fact there exist some Greek papyrus documents containing Christian canonical writings inscribed before Constantine.

Tanah has translated into Greek language even in 3-4 centuries BC
Day of the translation of the Tanah in the Greek language even today is considered as the day of mourning of the same level as the 9th of Ava mourning to mark the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem by the Romans.
For this reason, the Christian people do not know the language of their God - Christ - Aramaic.
 
What the hell are you talking about? You're just making this up. You don't even know some very basic things. Educate yourself and then come back and have a discussion. You just don't know enough to discuss these topics.

Are you disagree that Christ spoke Aramaic language?
Are you disagree that Aramaic is the language of Talmud that the orthodoxy Jews read and write even today?
Are you disagree that Christians hate Talmud?
Are you disagree that clerical Jews hate Christ?
 
But they do not agree to recognize their roots from Khazar witch “writings are in Hebrew language and script, because the Khazar rulers and many of the people adopted Judaism”.
I tell you my great historical hypothesis and conceptions and you tell me what you have read in Wiki.
In this matter I have cited a very well-known letter sent by the ruler of the Khazars to a Jewish scholar in Spain. The letter was written in Hebrew. And I have cited the only native written Khazar word that has survived in any document. It is the same as a modern Turkish word.

If your "hypotheses and conceptions" do not correspond to this evidence, they are simply wrong.
 
Are you disagree that Christ spoke Aramaic language?
Are you disagree that Aramaic is the language of Talmud that the orthodoxy Jews read and write even today?
Are you disagree that Christians hate Talmud?
Are you disagree that clerical Jews hate Christ?

No (The Jesus person would have spoken Aramaic. However the whole Christ thing is a made up fairy story)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
42
 
Last edited:
It is the great paradox.
No paradox at all. Rebels have always been persecuted and executed by incumbent governments. Your fallacy is to assume that this jebus person ever existed at all.
Orthodoxy Jews that hate Christ have saved His Language in Talmud for last 2000 years.
Except he didn't if he even existed.

It is the matter of fact.
Nope. Make-believe. Just like unicorns, dragons and fairies.

And people who like Christ do not want to know His language because it is the language of Talmud that they hate for 2000 years.
Jebus spoke Aramaic. You lose.

Enough is enough!
Yes. Yes it is. Stop promulgating notions which have no basis in reality.

Holy Resurrected Language to Every God Believer!
The Language of Christ to Every Christian!
The majority of people in the world are not Christian, what will you do with those?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom